Does an Integrated Palliative Care Program Reduce Emergency Department Transfers for Nursing Home Palliative Residents?

Author(s):  
Peiyan Ho ◽  
Yujun Lim ◽  
Laurence Lean Chin Tan ◽  
Xingli Wang ◽  
Gerlie Magpantay ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 166-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine Pouliot ◽  
Carol S. Weisse ◽  
David S. Pratt ◽  
Philip DiSorbo

Background: There is a growing need for home-based palliative care services, especially for seriously ill individuals who want to avoid hospitalizations and remain with their regular outside care providers. Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness of Care Choices, a new in-home palliative care program provided by the Visiting Nurse Services of Northeastern New York and Ellis Medicine’s community hospital serving New York’s Capital District. Methods: This prospective cohort study assessed patient outcomes over the course of 1 year for 123 patients (49 men and 74 women) with serious illnesses who were new enrollees in the program. Quality of life was assessed at baseline and after 1 month on service. Satisfaction with care was measured after 1 and 3 months on service. The number of emergency department visits and inpatient hospitalizations pre- and postenrollment was measured for all enrollees. Results: Patients were highly satisfied (72.7%-100%) with their initial care and reported greater satisfaction ( P < .05) and stable symptom management over time. Fewer emergency department ( P < .001) and inpatient hospital admissions ( P < .001) occurred among enrollees while on the palliative care service. Conclusion: An in-home palliative care program offered jointly through a visiting nurse service and community hospital may be a successful model for providing quality care that satisfies chronically ill patients’ desire to remain at home and avoid hospital admissions.


2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rose Miranda ◽  
◽  
Tinne Smets ◽  
Nele Van Den Noortgate ◽  
Jenny T. van der Steen ◽  
...  

Abstract Background ‘PACE Steps to Success’ is a multicomponent training program aiming to integrate generalist and non-disease-specific palliative care in nursing homes. This program did not improve residents’ comfort in the last week of life, but it appeared to improve quality of care and dying in their last month of life. Because this program included only three dementia-specific elements, its effects might differ depending on the presence or stage of dementia. We aimed to investigate whether the program effects differ between residents with advanced, non-advanced, and no dementia. Methods Pre-planned subgroup analysis of the PACE cluster-randomized controlled trial in 78 nursing homes in seven European countries. Participants included residents who died in the previous 4 months. The nursing home staff or general practitioner assessed the presence of dementia; severity was determined using two highly-discriminatory staff-reported instruments. Using after-death questionnaires, staff assessed comfort in the last week of life (Comfort Assessment in Dying–End-of-Life in Dementia-scale; primary outcome) and quality of care and dying in the last month of life (Quality of Dying in Long-Term Care scale; secondary outcome). Results At baseline, we included 177 residents with advanced dementia, 126 with non-advanced dementia and 156 without dementia. Post-intervention, respectively in the control and the intervention group, we included 136 and 104 residents with advanced dementia, 167 and 110 with non-advanced dementia and 157 and 137 without dementia. We found no subgroup differences on comfort in the last week of life, comparing advanced versus without dementia (baseline-adjusted mean sub-group difference 2.1; p-value = 0.177), non-advanced versus without dementia (2.7; p = 0.092), and advanced versus non-advanced dementia (− 0.6; p = 0.698); or on quality of care and dying in the last month of life, comparing advanced and without dementia (− 0.6; p = 0.741), non-advanced and without dementia (− 1.5; p = 0.428), and advanced and non-advanced dementia (0.9; p = 0.632). Conclusions The lack of subgroup difference suggests that while the program did not improve comfort in dying residents with or without dementia, it appeared to equally improve quality of care and dying in the last month of life for residents with dementia (regardless of the stage) and those without dementia. A generalist and non-disease-specific palliative care program, such as PACE Steps to Success, is a useful starting point for future palliative care improvement in nursing homes, but to effectively improve residents’ comfort, this program needs further development. Trial registration ISRCTN, ISRCTN14741671. Registered 8 July 2015 – Retrospectively registered.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rose Miranda ◽  
Tinne Smets ◽  
Nele Van Den Noortgate ◽  
Jenny T. van der Steen ◽  
Luc Deliens ◽  
...  

Abstract Background ‘PACE Steps to Success’ is a multicomponent training program aiming to integrate generalist and non-disease-specific palliative care in nursing homes. This program did not improve residents’ comfort in the last week of life, but it appeared to improve quality of care and dying in their last month of life. Because this program included only three dementia-specific elements, its effects might differ depending on the presence or stage of dementia. We aimed to investigate whether the program effects differ between residents with advanced, non-advanced, and no dementia.Methods Pre-planned subgroup analysis of the PACE cluster-randomized controlled trial in 78 nursing homes in seven European countries. Participants included residents who died in the previous four months and had advanced (n=104 to 177), non-advanced (n=110 to 167) or no dementia (n=137 to 157). The nursing home staff or general practitioner assessed the presence of dementia; severity was determined using two highly-discriminatory staff-reported instruments. Using after-death questionnaires, staff assessed comfort in the last week of life (Comfort Assessment in Dying–End-of-Life in Dementia-scale; primary outcome) and quality of care and dying in the last month of life (Quality of Dying in Long-Term Care scale; secondary outcome).Results We found no subgroup differences on comfort, comparing advanced versus without dementia (baseline-adjusted mean sub-group difference 2.1; p-value=0.177), non-advanced versus without dementia (2.7; p=0.092), and advanced versus non-advanced dementia (-0.6; p=0.698); or on quality of care and dying, comparing advanced and without dementia (-0.6; p=0.741), non-advanced and without dementia (-1.5; p=0.428), and advanced and non-advanced dementia (0.9; p=0.632).Conclusions The lack of subgroup difference suggests that while the program did not improve comfort in dying residents with or without dementia, it appeared to equally improve quality of care and dying in the last month of life for residents with dementia (regardless of the stage) and those without dementia. A generalist and non-disease-specific palliative care program, such as PACE Steps to Success, is a useful starting point for future palliative care improvement in nursing homes, but to effectively improve residents’ comfort, this program needs further development.Trial registration. ISRCTN, ISRCTN14741671. Registered 8 July 2015 – Retrospectively registered.http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN14741671


2007 ◽  
Vol 34 (S 2) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Jox ◽  
S Haarmann-Doetkotte ◽  
M Wasner ◽  
GD Borasio

Author(s):  
Audrey J. Tan ◽  
Rebecca Yamarik ◽  
Abraham A. Brody ◽  
Frank R. Chung ◽  
Corita Grudzen

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document