scholarly journals Menstrual Cycle Effects on Perceived Exertion and Pain During Exercise Among Sedentary Women

2011 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 439-446 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann E. Caldwell Hooper ◽  
Angela D. Bryan ◽  
Melissa Eaton
2005 ◽  
Vol 37 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. S237
Author(s):  
M. Allison Williams ◽  
Fredric Goss ◽  
Robert Robertson ◽  
Elizabeth Nagle-Stilley ◽  
Kathleen Ryan

Author(s):  
Nuria Romero-Parra ◽  
Victor Manuel Alfaro-Magallanes ◽  
Beatriz Rael ◽  
Rocío Cupeiro ◽  
Miguel A. Rojo-Tirado ◽  
...  

Context: The indirect markers of muscle damage have been previously studied in females. However, inconclusive results have been found, possibly explained by the heterogeneity regarding monitoring and verification of menstrual-cycle phase. Purpose: To determine whether the fluctuations in sex hormones during the menstrual cycle influence muscle damage. Methods: A total of 19 well-trained eumenorrheic women (age 28.6 [5.9] y; height 163.4 [6.1] cm; weight 59.6 [5.8] kg body mass) performed an eccentric-based resistance protocol consisting of 10 × 10 back squats at 60% of their 1-repetition maximum on the early follicular phase (EFP), late follicular phase, and midluteal phase of the menstrual cycle. Range of motion, muscle soreness, countermovement jump, and limb circumferences were evaluated prior to 24 and 48 hours postexercise. Perceived exertion was evaluated after each set. Results: Differences in sex hormones indicated that tests were adequately performed in the different menstrual-cycle phases. Prior to exercise, muscle soreness was higher in the EFP (4.7 [7.7]) than in the late follicular phase (1.1 [3.2]; P = .045). No other variables showed significant differences between phases. Time-point differences (baseline, 24, and 48 h) were observed in knee range of motion (P = .02), muscle soreness, countermovement jump, and between sets for perceived exertion (P < .001). Conclusion: Although the protocol elicited muscle damage, hormonal fluctuations over the menstrual cycle did not seem to affect indirect markers of muscle damage, except for perceived muscle soreness. Muscle soreness was perceived to be more severe before exercise performed in EFP, when estrogen concentrations are relatively low. This may impair women’s predisposition to perform strenuous exercise during EFP.


1997 ◽  
Vol 29 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. 216
Author(s):  
C. S. Winters ◽  
R. J. Robertson ◽  
M. W. Miley ◽  
F. L. Goss ◽  
N. M. Moyna

2010 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
pp. 342
Author(s):  
Kimberly P. Harrison ◽  
Matt Moran ◽  
James Hokanson ◽  
Joy Hendrick

1982 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 218???222 ◽  
Author(s):  
LOU A. STEPHENSON ◽  
MARGARET A. KOLKA ◽  
J. E. WILKERSON

2013 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 102-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hassan Mohamed Elsangedy ◽  
Kleverton Krinski ◽  
Eduardo Caldas Costa ◽  
Luke Haile ◽  
Andre Igor Fonteles ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 90 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 505-513 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leanne M. Redman ◽  
Garry C. Scroop ◽  
Robert J. Norman

Author(s):  
Mikaeli A. Carmichael ◽  
Rebecca L. Thomson ◽  
Lisa J. Moran ◽  
Joel R. Dunstan ◽  
Maximillian J. Nelson ◽  
...  

The effect of the menstrual cycle on athlete performance, wellbeing and perceived exertion and fatigue is not well understood. Furthermore, it has not been investigated specifically in Australian Football athletes. This pilot study aimed to explore how naturally menstruating Australian Football athletes may be affected by menstrual cycle phase. The data collected from the routine monitoring of five naturally menstruating athletes (average menstrual cycle length of 28 ± 3 [SD] days) in one team (athlete age range 18–35 years) competing in the Women’s Australian Football League during the 2019 season were retrospectively analysed to compare performance (countermovement jump parameters and adductor squeeze pressure), perceived exertion, perceived fatigue and wellbeing (perceived sleep quality, stress and soreness) outcomes between the follicular and luteal phases. Performance, perceived exertion, stress and soreness did not appear to be affected by menstrual cycle phase (p > 0.17). However, perceived fatigue appeared to be significantly greater (p = 0.042) and sleep quality worse (p = 0.005) in the luteal phase. This pilot study suggests further research focusing on the effect of menstrual cycle phase on subjective fatigue and wellbeing is warranted.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document