An interior point algorithm for solving smooth convex programs based on Newton’s method

Author(s):  
Sanjay Mehrotra ◽  
Jie Sun
2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Machacek ◽  
Shafiu Jibrin

We investigate solving semidefinite programs (SDPs) with an interior point method called SDP-CUT, which utilizes weighted analytic centers and cutting plane constraints. SDP-CUT iteratively refines the feasible region to achieve the optimal solution. The algorithm uses Newton’s method to compute the weighted analytic center. We investigate different stepsize determining techniques. We found that using Newton's method with exact line search is generally the best implementation of the algorithm. We have also compared our algorithm to the SDPT3 method and found that SDP-CUT initially gets into the neighborhood of the optimal solution in less iterations on all our test problems. SDP-CUT also took less iterations to reach optimality on many of the problems. However, SDPT3 required less iterations on most of the test problems and less time on all the problems. Some theoretical properties of the convergence of SDP-CUT are also discussed.


2021 ◽  
Vol 103 (2) ◽  
pp. 76-80
Author(s):  
D. V. Denisov ◽  
Yu. G. Evtushenko ◽  
A. A. Tret’yakov

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Shafiu Jibrin

We study the problem of computing weighted analytic center for system of linear matrix inequality constraints. The problem can be solved using Standard Newton’s method. However, this approach requires that a starting point in the interior point of the feasible region be given or a Phase I problem be solved. We address the problem by using Infeasible Newton’s method applied to the KKT system of equations which can be started from any point. We implement the method using backtracking line search technique and also study the effect of large weights on the method. We use numerical experiments to compare Infeasible Newton’s method with Standard Newton’s method. The results show that Infeasible Newton’s method moves in the interior of the feasible regions often very quickly, starting from any point. We recommend it as a method for finding an interior point by setting each weight to be 1. It appears to work better than Standard Newton’s method in finding the weighted analytic center when none of weights is very large relative to the other weights. However, we find that Infeasible Newton’s method is more sensitive than Standard Newton’s method to large variation in the weights.


2012 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 167-169
Author(s):  
F.M.PATEL F.M.PATEL ◽  
◽  
N. B. PANCHAL N. B. PANCHAL

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document