The self-consistent field equations

Author(s):  
L. Faddeev ◽  
O. Yakubovskiĭ

The self-consistent field equations without exchange have been solved for carbon by Torrance (1934) and the energy calculated by Ufford (1938). The results obtained by solving the self-consistent field equations including exchange for neutral carbon are given in this paper. It seemed to be useful to compute the self-consistent field for ions C +4 and C ++ also. Calculations for this atom were undertaken because the results are interesting for chemists and, moreover, in order to gain experience of these rather complicated calculations it seemed best to start on one of the light elements. The notation and method of calculation are in general the same as those used and developed by D. R. and W. Hartree (1935, 1936 a, b, c , 1938 a, b ). The main difference is in the calculation of Y k functions.



Molecules ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 1218 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susi Lehtola ◽  
Frank Blockhuys ◽  
Christian Van Alsenoy

A uniform derivation of the self-consistent field equations in a finite basis set is presented. Both restricted and unrestricted Hartree–Fock (HF) theory as well as various density functional approximations are considered. The unitary invariance of the HF and density functional models is discussed, paving the way for the use of localized molecular orbitals. The self-consistent field equations are derived in a non-orthogonal basis set, and their solution is discussed also in the presence of linear dependencies in the basis. It is argued why iterative diagonalization of the Kohn–Sham–Fock matrix leads to the minimization of the total energy. Alternative methods for the solution of the self-consistent field equations via direct minimization as well as stability analysis are briefly discussed. Explicit expressions are given for the contributions to the Kohn–Sham–Fock matrix up to meta-GGA functionals. Range-separated hybrids and non-local correlation functionals are summarily reviewed.



1993 ◽  
Vol 3 (8) ◽  
pp. 1861-1872 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. P. Julien ◽  
D. Mayou


1—The method of the self-consistent field for determining the wave functions and energy levels of an atom with many electrons was developed by Hartree, and later derived from a variation principle and modified to take account of exchange and of Pauli’s exclusion principle by Slater* and Fock. No attempt was made to consider relativity effects, and the use of “ spin ” wave functions was purely formal. Since, in the solution of Dirac’s equation for a hydrogen-like atom of nuclear charge Z, the difference of the radial wave functions from the solutions of Schrodinger’s equation depends on the ratio Z/137, it appears that for heavy atoms the relativity correction will be of importance; in fact, it may in some cases be of more importance as a modification of Hartree’s original self-nsistent field equation than “ exchange ” effects. The relativistic self-consistent field equation neglecting “ exchange ” terms can be formed from Dirac’s equation by a method completely analogous to Hartree’s original derivation of the non-relativistic self-consistent field equation from Schrodinger’s equation. Here we are concerned with including both relativity and “ exchange ” effects and we show how Slater’s varia-tional method may be extended for this purpose. A difficulty arises in considering the relativistic theory of any problem concerning more than one electron since the correct wave equation for such a system is not known. Formulae have been given for the inter-action energy of two electrons, taking account of magnetic interactions and retardation, by Gaunt, Breit, and others. Since, however, none of these is to be regarded as exact, in the present paper the crude electrostatic expression for the potential energy will be used. The neglect of the magnetic interactions is not likely to lead to any great error for an atom consisting mainly of closed groups, since the magnetic field of a closed group vanishes. Also, since the self-consistent field type of approximation is concerned with the interaction of average distributions of electrons in one-electron wave functions, it seems probable that retardation does not play an important part. These effects are in any case likely to be of less importance than the improvement in the grouping of the wave functions which arises from using a wave equation which involves the spins implicitly.











Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document