Quantifying Flight of Colorado Potato Beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) with a Microcomputer-Based Flight Mill System

1993 ◽  
Vol 86 (3) ◽  
pp. 366-371 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald C. Weber ◽  
David N. Ferro ◽  
John G. Stoffolano
Keyword(s):  
Sensors ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 2112
Author(s):  
Maged Mohammed ◽  
Hamadttu El-Shafie ◽  
Nashi Alqahtani

Understanding the flight characteristics of insect pests is essential for designing effective strategies and programs for their management. In this study, we designed, constructed, and validated the performance of modern flight-testing systems (flight mill and flight tunnel) for studying the flight behavior of red palm weevil (RPW) Rhynchophorus ferrugineus (Olivier) under a controlled atmosphere. The flight-testing mill consisted of a flight mill, a testing chamber with an automatically controlled microclimate, and a data logging and processing unit. The data logging and processing unit consisted of a USB digital oscilloscope connected with a laptop. We used MATLAB 2020A to implement a graphical user interface (GUI) for real-time sampling and data processing. The flight-testing tunnel was fitted with a horizontal video camera to photograph the insects during flight. The program of Image-Pro plus V 10.0.8 was used for image processing and numerical data analysis to determine weevil tracking. The mean flight speed of RPW was 82.12 ± 8.5 m/min, and the RPW stopped flying at the temperature of 20 °C. The RPW flight speed in the flight tunnel was slightly higher than that on the flight mill. The angular deceleration was 0.797 rad/s2, and the centripetal force was 0.0203 N when a RPW tethered to the end of the rotating arm. The calculated moment of inertia of the RPW mass and the flight mill's rotating components was 9.521 × 10−3 N m2. The minimum thrust force needed to rotate the flight mill was 1.98 × 10−3 N. Therefore, the minimum power required to rotate the flight mill with the mean revolution per min of 58.02 rpm was approximately 2.589 × 10−3 W. The designed flight-testing systems and their applied software proved productive and useful tools in unveiling essential flight characteristics of test insects in the laboratory.


2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Min Chen ◽  
Peng Chen ◽  
Hui Ye ◽  
Ruiling Yuan ◽  
Xiaowei Wang ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 633-641 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aubree M. Kees ◽  
Andrea R. Hefty ◽  
Robert C. Venette ◽  
Steven J. Seybold ◽  
Brian H. Aukema

1984 ◽  
Vol 77 (2) ◽  
pp. 119-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. L. Clarke ◽  
W. A. Rowley ◽  
S. Christiansen ◽  
D. W. Jacobson

2016 ◽  
Vol 62 (4) ◽  
pp. 195-201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jasmin Putz ◽  
Eva M. Vorwagner ◽  
Gernot Hoch

Abstract Flight performance of Monochamus sartor and Monochamus sutor, two potential vectors of the pine wood nematode, Bursaphelenchus xylophilus was evaluated in laboratory flight mill tests. Beetles emerging from logs infested in the laboratory and incubated under outdoor conditions as well as field collected beetles were used. The maximum distance flown by M. sartor in a single flight was 3,136.7 m. Mean distances (per beetle) per flight ranged from 694.6 m in females to 872.5 m in males for M. sartor. In 75% of all individual flights M. sartor flew less than 1 km; only 3.7% flew distances longer than 2 km. The mean cumulative distance travelled by M. sartor beetles throughout their lifespan was 7.5 km. The smaller M. sutor beetles flew faster and longer distances. The maximum distance per flight was 5,556.5 m; mean distances ranged from 1,653.6 m in females to 1178.3 m in males. The number of available laboratory reared beetles was too low for quantification of lifetime flight capacity for M. sutor. The findings are compared to published data from Monochamus galloprovincialis recorded on the same type of flight mill as well as to field data from mark-release-recapture studies. The high flight capacity of Monochamus beetles illustrates the importance of considering dispersal of the vectors when planning control measures against the pine wood nematode.


Sensors ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 485 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Martí-Campoy ◽  
Juan Ávalos ◽  
Antonia Soto ◽  
Francisco Rodríguez-Ballester ◽  
Victoria Martínez-Blay ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document