scholarly journals Chocolate intake and heart disease and stroke in the Women's Health Initiative: a prospective analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 108 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
James A Greenberg ◽  
JoAnn E Manson ◽  
Marian L Neuhouser ◽  
Lesley Tinker ◽  
Charles Eaton ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Background Three recent meta-analyses found significant prospective inverse associations between chocolate intake and cardiovascular disease risk. Evidence from these meta-analyses suggests that such inverse associations may only apply to elderly individuals or those with pre-existing major chronic disease. Objective We assessed the association between habitual chocolate intake and subsequent incident coronary heart disease (CHD) and stroke, and the potential effect of modification by age. Design We conducted multivariable Cox regression analyses using data from 83,310 postmenopausal women free of baseline pre-existing major chronic disease in the prospective Women's Health Initiative cohort. Chocolate intake was assessed using a food-frequency questionnaire. Physician-adjudicated events or deaths were ascertained up to 30 September 2013. Results After exclusions, there were 3246 CHD and 2624 stroke events or deaths, representing incidence rates of 3.9% and 3.2% during 1,098,091 and 1,101,022 person-years (13.4 y), respectively. We found no association between consumption of chocolate and risk of CHD (P for linear trend = 0.94) or stroke (P = 0.24). The results for CHD and stroke combined were similar (P = 0.30), but were significantly modified by age (P for interaction = 0.02). For women age <65 y at baseline, those who ate 1 oz (28.35 g) of chocolate <1/mo, 1 to <1.5/mo, 1.5 to <3.5/mo, 3.5/mo to <3/wk, and ≥3/wk had HRs (95% CIs) of 1.00 (referent), 1.17 (1.00, 1.36), 1.05 (0.90, 1.22), 1.09 (0.94, 1.25), and 1.27 (1.09, 1.49), respectively (P for linear trend = 0.005). No association was apparent for older women. Conclusion We observed no association between chocolate intake and risk of CHD, stroke, or both combined in participants free of pre-existing major chronic disease. The relation for both combined was modified by age, with a significant positive linear trend and an increased risk in the highest quintile of chocolate consumption among women age <65 y. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03453073.

Author(s):  
Garnet L. Anderson ◽  
Ross L. Prentice

Over the last decade, several large-scale randomized trials have reported results that disagreed substantially with the motivating observational studies on the value of various chronic disease–prevention strategies. One high-profile example of these discrepancies was related to postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT) use and its effects on cardiovascular disease and cancer. The Women’s Health Initiative (WHI), a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute–sponsored program, was designed to test three interventions for the prevention of chronic diseases in postmenopausal women, each of which was motivated by a decade or more of analytic epidemiology. Specifically, the trials were testing the potential for HT to prevent coronary heart disease (CHD), a low-fat eating pattern to reduce breast and colorectal cancer incidence, and calcium and vitamin D supplements to prevent hip fractures. Over 68,000 postmenopausal women were randomized to one, two, or all three randomized clinical trial (CT) components between 1993 and 1998 at 40 U.S. clinical centers (Anderson et al., 2003a). The HT component consisted of two parallel trials testing the effects of conjugated equine estrogens alone (E-alone) among women with prior hysterectomy and the effect of combined estrogen plus progestin therapy (E+P), in this case conjugated equine estrogens plus medroxyprogesterone acetate, among women with an intact uterus, on the incidence of CHD and overall health. In 2002, the randomized trial of E+P was stopped early, based on an assessment of risks exceeding benefits for chronic disease prevention, raising concerns among millions of menopausal women and their care providers about their use of these medicines. The trial confirmed the benefit of HT for fracture-risk reduction but the expected benefit for CHD, the primary study end point, was not observed. Rather, the trial results documented increased risks of CHD, stroke, venous thromboembolism (VTE), and breast cancer with combined hormones (Writing Group for the Women’s Health Initiative Investigators, 2002). Approximately 18 months later, the E-alone trial was also stopped, based on the finding of an adverse effect on stroke rates and the likelihood that the study would not confirm the CHD-prevention hypothesis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document