scholarly journals Comparative Histologic Features of Liver Biopsy Specimens From Patients Coinfected With Hepatitis G and C Viruses With Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Alone:An Age-, Sex-, Disease Duration–, and Transmission-Matched Controlled Study of Chronic Hepatitis

1997 ◽  
Vol 108 (6) ◽  
pp. 625-632 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neal S. Goldstein ◽  
Jeanette Underhill ◽  
Stuart C. Gordon ◽  
Nasser Bayati ◽  
Ann Silverman
2015 ◽  
Vol 156 (21) ◽  
pp. 855-861 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alajos Pár ◽  
Áron Vincze ◽  
Gabriella Pár

Chronic hepatitis C virus infection associated with necroinflammation predisposes to liver fibrosis and cirrhosis, which lead to severe end-stage complications. Staging of fibrosis is of basic importance for the indication of antiviral treatment, for monitoring the response and predicting the prognosis of patients with hepatitis C virus related liver disease. Since liver biopsy, the “gold standard” diagnosis of fibrosis is invasive and it has some other limitations, non-invasive methods have been developed and widely used in the clinical practice. Serum biomarkers and physical approaches measuring liver stiffness by elastography as well as combination algorithms have been gradually been integrated into guidelines resulting in a reduction of the need for liver biopsy. The authors review these non-invasive fibrosis markers and discuss their role in the indication of treatment, follow-up, and assessment of prognosis of patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection. Orv. Hetil., 2015, 156(21), 855–861.


2008 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 423-428 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathleen B Schwarz ◽  
Aglaia Zellos ◽  
Lisette Stamato ◽  
John Boitnott ◽  
Elizabeth Perlman ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. e0250833
Author(s):  
Peter Buggisch ◽  
Hans Heiken ◽  
Stefan Mauss ◽  
Bernd Weber ◽  
Maria-Christina Jung ◽  
...  

Despite the availability of highly effective and well-tolerated direct-acting antivirals, not all patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection receive treatment. This retrospective, multi-centre, noninterventional, case-control study identified patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection initiating (control) or not initiating (case) treatment at 43 sites in Germany from September 2017 to June 2018. It aimed to compare characteristics of the two patient populations and to identify factors involved in patient/physician decision to initiate/not initiate chronic hepatitis C virus treatment, with a particular focus on historical barriers. Overall, 793 patients were identified: 573 (72%) who received treatment and 220 (28%) who did not. In 42% of patients, the reason for not initiating treatment was patient wish, particularly due to fear of treatment (17%) or adverse events (13%). Other frequently observed reasons for not initiating treatment were in accordance with known historical barriers for physicians to initiate therapy, including perceived or expected lack of compliance (14.5%), high patient age (10.9%), comorbidities (15.0%), alcohol abuse (9.1%), hard drug use (7.7%), and opioid substitution therapy (4.5%). Patient wish against therapy was also a frequently reported reason for not initiating treatment in the postponed (35.2%) and not planned (47.0%) subgroups; of note, known historical factors were also common reasons for postponing treatment. Real-world and clinical trial evidence is accumulating, which suggests that such historical barriers do not negatively impact treatment effectiveness. Improved education is key to facilitate progress towards the World Health Organization target of eliminating viral hepatitis as a major public health threat by 2030.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document