Establishing Evidence-Based Statistical Quality Control Practices

2018 ◽  
Vol 151 (4) ◽  
pp. 364-370 ◽  
Author(s):  
James O Westgard ◽  
Sten A Westgard

AbstractObjectivesTo establish an objective, scientific, evidence-based process for planning statistical quality control (SQC) procedures based on quality required for a test, precision and bias observed for a measurement procedure, probabilities of error detection and false rejection for different control rules and numbers of control measurements, and frequency of QC events (or run size) to minimize patient risk.MethodsA Sigma-Metric Run Size Nomogram and Power Function Graphs have been used to guide the selection of control rules, numbers of control measurements, and frequency of QC events (or patient run size).ResultsA tabular summary is provided by a Sigma-Metric Run Size Matrix, with a graphical summary of Westgard Sigma Rules with Run Sizes.ConclusionMedical laboratories can plan evidence-based SQC practices using simple tools that relate the Sigma-Metric of a testing process to the control rules, number of control measurements, and run size (or frequency of QC events).

2020 ◽  
Vol 58 (9) ◽  
pp. 1517-1523
Author(s):  
Martín Yago ◽  
Carolina Pla

AbstractBackgroundStatistical quality control (SQC) procedures generally use rejection limits centered on the stable mean of the results obtained for a control material by the analyzing instrument. However, for instruments with significant bias, re-centering the limits on a different value could improve the control procedures from the viewpoint of patient safety.MethodsA statistical model was used to assess the effect of shifting the rejection limits of the control procedure relative to the instrument mean on the number of erroneous results reported as a result of an increase in the systematic error of the measurement procedure due to an out-of-control condition. The behaviors of control procedures of type 1ks (k = 2, 2.5, 3) were studied when applied to analytical processes with different capabilities (σ = 3, 4, 6).ResultsFor measuring instruments with bias, shifting the rejection limits in the direction opposite to the bias improves the ability of the quality control procedure to limit the risk posed to patients in a systematic out-of-control condition. The maximum benefit is obtained when the displacement is equal to the bias of the instrument, that is, when the rejection limits are centered on the reference mean of the control material. The strategy is sensitive to error in estimating the bias. Shifting the limits more than the instrument’s bias disproportionately increases the risk to patients. This effect should be considered in SQC planning for systems running the same test on multiple instruments.ConclusionsCentering the control rule on the reference mean is a potentially useful strategy for SQC planning based on risk management for measuring instruments with significant and stable uncorrected bias. Low uncertainty in estimating bias is necessary for this approach not to be counterproductive.


2015 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashley N. Anderson ◽  
Joshua M. Browning ◽  
Joey Comeaux ◽  
Amanda S. Hering ◽  
Douglas Nychka

1994 ◽  
Vol 89 (428) ◽  
pp. 1200-1208 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. C. Gentleman ◽  
M. S. Hamada ◽  
D. E. Matthews ◽  
A. R. Wilson

1945 ◽  
Vol 152 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-75
Author(s):  
J. C. Edwards ◽  
W. A. Bennett

The purpose of the paper is to outline the numerous directions in which improvements can be sought in engineering inspection. It shows how direct improvements in efficiency can be effected by carefully planned methods of recording results, including the use of statistical quality control, by adopting the principles of time and motion study in the planning of flow of work through inspection, and in the design of gauging fixtures and the arrangement of gauges. The importance of correct personnel selection and organization is stressed, as is also the avoidance of duplication of inspection. The paper concludes by quoting figures showing the substantial reductions which have been achieved in the authors' company by a progressive application of the methods described over a period of several years.


Technometrics ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 221
Author(s):  
Eric R. Ziegel ◽  
Steven M. Zimmerman ◽  
Marjorie L. Icenogle

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document