P-275 First-line pembrolizumab versus investigator-choice chemotherapy for mismatch repair–deficient or microsatellite instability–high metastatic colorectal carcinoma: randomized, phase 3 KEYNOTE-177 study

TPS789 Background: Mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) tumors are characterized by high mutational load and lymphocyte infiltration and may be good candidates for immune checkpoint blockade. Pembrolizumab is a monoclonal antibody against PD-1 that is designed to block its interaction with PD-L1 and PD-L2 and thus allow an antitumor immune response. In the KEYNOTE-016 proof-of-concept study, pembrolizumab showed promising antitumor activity against dMMR tumors in patients (pts) with treatment-refractory metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC). KEYNOTE-177 is an international, randomized trial designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab compared with standard-of-care (SOC) chemotherapy in the first-line setting for dMMR or microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) mCRC. Methods: Key eligibility criteria include age ≥ 18 y, confirmed MSI-H or dMMR mCRC, ECOG PS 0-1, no active autoimmune disease or brain metastases, and no prior therapy for metastatic disease. Pts will be randomized 1:1 to receive either pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W or investigator’s choice of SOC chemotherapy. Chemotherapy must be chosen prior to randomization; options include mFOLFOX6 or FOLFIRI alone or in combination with bevacizumab or cetuximab. Treatment will continue until PD, unacceptable toxicity, pt/investigator decision, or completion of 35 cycles (pembrolizumab only). Response will be evaluated every 9 wk per RECIST v1.1 by central review and per RECIST adapted for immunotherapy response patterns. Eligible pts may continue pembrolizumab beyond initial RECIST-defined progression. Pts in the SOC arm who have PD and meet crossover criteria may be eligible to receive pembrolizumab for up to 17 treatment cycles. AEs will be assessed throughout treatment and for 30 d thereafter (up to 90 d for serious AEs) and graded per NCI CTCAE v4.0. Pts will be followed for survival every 9 wk. PFS per RECIST v1.1 is the primary end point; OS and ORR are key secondary end points. Other end points include duration of response and health-related quality of life. Planned enrollment in KEYNOTE-177 is 270 pts.

Download Full-text

Pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair deficient metastatic colorectal cancer: The phase 3 KEYNOTE-177 Study.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2020.38.18_suppl.lba4 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 38 (18_suppl) ◽

pp. LBA4-LBA4 ◽

Cited By ~ 42

Author(s):

Thierry Andre ◽

Kai-Keen Shiu ◽

Tae Won Kim ◽

Benny Vittrup Jensen ◽

Lars Henrik Jensen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Colorectal Cancer ◽

Microsatellite Instability ◽

Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽

Mismatch Repair ◽

Standard Of Care ◽

First Line ◽

Phase 3 ◽

End Points ◽

First Line Therapy ◽

Line Therapy

LBA4 Background: KEYNOTE-177 (NCT02563002) is a phase 3, randomized open-label study evaluating the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab (pembro) versus standard of care chemotherapy ± bevacizumab or cetuximab (chemo) as first-line therapy for patients (pts) with microsatellite-instability high/mismatch repair deficient (MSI-H/dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We present results of the final PFS analysis. Methods: A total of 307 pts with MSI-H/dMMR mCRC as determined locally and ECOG PS 0 or 1 were randomly assigned 1:1 to first-line pembro 200 mg Q3W for up to 2 years or investigator’s choice of mFOLFOX6 or FOLFIRI Q2W ± bevacizumab or cetuximab (chemo chosen prior to randomization). Treatment continued until PD, unacceptable toxicity, pt/investigator decision to withdraw, or completion of 35 cycles (pembro only). Patients receiving chemo could crossover to pembro for up to 35 cycles after confirmed PD. Primary end points were PFS (RECIST v1.1, central review) and OS. Key secondary end points included ORR (RECIST v1.1, central review), and safety. The data cutoff date for this interim analysis was Feb 19, 2020. The study will continue without changes to evaluate OS. Results: At data cutoff, 153 pts were randomized to pembro and 154 to chemo. Median (range) study follow-up was 28.4 mo (0.2-48.3) with pembro vs 27.2 mo (0.8-46.6) with chemo. Pembro was superior to chemo for PFS (median 16.5 mo vs 8.2 mo; HR 0.60; 95% CI, 0.45-0.80; P=0.0002). The 12- and 24-mo PFS rates were 55.3% and 48.3% with pembro vs 37.3% and 18.6% with chemo. Confirmed ORR was 43.8% vs 33.1%; median (range) duration of response was not reached (2.3+ to 41.4+) with pembro vs 10.6 mo (2.8 to 37.5+) with chemo. Grade 3-5 treatment related adverse event (AE) rates were 22% vs 66% for pembro vs chemo. One pt in the chemo arm died due to a treatment-related AE. Conclusions: Pembro provided a clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvement in PFS versus chemo as first-line therapy for pts with MSI-H/dMMR mCRC, with fewer treatment-related AEs observed and should be the new standard of care for these pts. Clinical trial information: NCT02563002 .

Download Full-text