scholarly journals Long-term efficacy of denosumab in giant cell tumor of bone: Results of an open-label phase 2 study

2017 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
pp. v645-v646 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Palmerini ◽  
J-Y. Blay ◽  
A. Le Cesne ◽  
P. Reichardt ◽  
P. Rutkowski ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. iv497
Author(s):  
S. Ferrari ◽  
P. Rutkowski ◽  
R.J. Grimer ◽  
P.D. Stalley ◽  
S.P.D. Dijkstra ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10500-10500 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Thomas ◽  
S. P. Chawla ◽  
K. Skubitz ◽  
A. P. Staddon ◽  
R. Henshaw ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (9) ◽  
pp. 2860-2868 ◽  
Author(s):  
Piotr Rutkowski ◽  
Stefano Ferrari ◽  
Robert J. Grimer ◽  
Paul D. Stalley ◽  
Sander P. D. Dijkstra ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 275-280 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Thomas ◽  
Robert Henshaw ◽  
Keith Skubitz ◽  
Sant Chawla ◽  
Arthur Staddon ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (12) ◽  
pp. 1719-1729 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sant Chawla ◽  
Jean-Yves Blay ◽  
Piotr Rutkowski ◽  
Axel Le Cesne ◽  
Peter Reichardt ◽  
...  

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Emanuela Palmerini ◽  
Leanne L. Seeger ◽  
Marco Gambarotti ◽  
Alberto Righi ◽  
Peter Reichardt ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is a rare osteoclastogenic stromal tumor. GCTB can rarely undergo malignant transformation. This post hoc analysis evaluated and classified malignancies in patients with GCTB who received denosumab. Methods This analysis was conducted on patients with pathologically confirmed GCTB and measurable active disease treated with denosumab 120 mg subcutaneously once every 4 weeks, with loading doses on study days 8 and 15, as part of a phase 2, open-label, multicenter study. We identified potential cases of malignancy related to GCTB through an independent multidisciplinary review or medical history, associated imaging or histopathologic reports, and disease course. The findings were summarized and no statistical analysis was performed. Results Twenty of five hundred twenty-six patients (3.8%) who received at least one dose of denosumab were misdiagnosed with GCTB that was later discovered to be malignancies: five primary malignant GCTB, five secondary malignant GCTB, four sarcomatous transformations, and six patients with other malignancies (giant cell-rich osteosarcoma, undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, spindle cell sarcoma, osteogenic sarcoma, phosphaturic mesenchymal tumor of mixed connective tissue type, and fibrosarcoma/malignant fibrous histiocytoma). Many malignancies were present before denosumab was initiated (8 definitive cases, 7 likely cases), excluding potential involvement of denosumab in these cases. Signs associated with potential misdiagnoses of GCTB included poor mineralization with denosumab treatment, rapid relapse in pain, or a failure of the typical dramatic improvement in pain normally observed with denosumab. Conclusions Although rare, GCTB can undergo malignant transformation, and rates in this study were consistent with previous reports. Signs of poor mineralization or lack of response to denosumab treatment may warrant close monitoring. Trial registration clinicaltrials.gov, (NCT00680992). Registered May 20, 2008.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 207-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sagar Lonial ◽  
Hans C Lee ◽  
Ashraf Badros ◽  
Suzanne Trudel ◽  
Ajay K Nooka ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document