Microwave versus radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of liver malignancies: a randomized controlled phase 2 trial

Microwave (MWA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) are main ablative techniques for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and colorectal liver metastasis (MT). This randomized phase 2 clinical trial compares the effectiveness of MWA and RFA as well as morphology of corresponding ablation zones. HCC and MT patients with 1.5–4 cm tumors, suitable for ablation, were randomized into MWA or RFA Groups. The primary endpoint was short-to-long diameter ratio of ablation zone (SLR). Primary technical success (TS) and a cumulative local tumor progression (LTP) after a median 2-year follow-up were compared. Between June 2015 and April 2020, 82 patients were randomly assigned (41 patients per group). For the per-protocol analysis, five patients were excluded. MWA created larger ablation zones than RFA (p = 0.036) although without differences in SLR (0.5 for both groups, p = 0.229). The TS was achieved in 98% (46/47) and 90% (45/50) (p = 0.108), and LTP was observed in 21% (10/47) vs. 12% (6/50) (OR 1.9 [95% CI 0.66–5.3], p = 0.238) of tumors in MWA vs. RFA Group, respectively. Major complications were found in 5 cases (11%) vs. 2 cases (4%), without statistical significance. MWA and RFA show similar SLR, effectiveness and safety in liver tumors between 1.5 and 4 cm.

Clofarabine with topotecan, vinorelbine, and thiotepa reinduction regimen for children and young adults with relapsed AML

Effective reinduction regimens are needed for children with relapsed and refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) as outcomes remain poor. Therapeutic options are limited in this heavily pre-treated patient population, many of whom have reached lifetime recommended doses of anthracycline chemotherapy. The development of effective non-anthracycline based salvage regimens is crucial to these patients who are at significant risk of life-threatening cardiotoxicity. We previously reported results of a phase 2 trial of a clofarabine-based regimen with topotecan, vinorelbine, and thiotepa (TVTC) in patients with relapsed acute leukemias. Here we report on an expanded bicenter cohort of 33 patients, <25 years of age, with relapsed/refractory (R/R) AML treated with up to 2 cycles of the TVTC reinduction regimen from 2007 to 2018. The overall response rate (ORR), defined as complete remission (CR) or CR with partial recovery of platelet count (CRp), was 71.4% (95%CI: 41.9 to 91.6%) for those patients in first relapse (n=14) and 47.4% ( 95%CI: 24.4 to 71.1%) for patients in 2nd or greater relapse or refractory disease. Responses were seen across multiple high risk cytogenetic and molecular subtypes, with 84% of responders successfully bridged to allogeneic stem cell transplantation. The 5-year OS for patients in first relapse was 46.2% (95%CI: 19.1 to 73.3%) and 50.0% (95%CI: 26.9 to 73.1%) for patients who responded to TVTC. For pediatric and young adult patients with R/R AML, TVTC reinduction compares favorably with currently used salvage regimens and warrants further exploration.

A Nonrandomized Phase 2 Trial of EG-Mirotin, a Novel, First-in-class, Subcutaneously Delivered Peptide Drug for Non-Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy

ABSTRACTBackgroundEG-Mirotin, which includes an active ingredient; EGT022, targeting Non-Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (NPDR), the early stage of retinopathy. EG-Mirotin is a drug that is used before capillary damage progresses to an irreversible stage. Safety and efficacy of EG-Mirotin were investigated in subjects with Type 1 or 2 diabetes and NPDR with the degree from moderate to severe.MethodsSubjects (n=10, 20 eyes) satisfying the selection criteria through the screening test were administered EG-Mirotin once a day (3 mg in 1.5 ml of sterile saline) for 5 days, 5 times in total, and were evaluated of the Ischemic index changes and safety. End-of-study (EOS) is performed approximately 8 weeks ± 1 (57 days ± 7) from the first dose.ResultsA total of 4 Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) were observed in 2 subjects out of 10 (20.00%) who received the investigational drug. Among them, no subjects were reported experiencing a TEAE related to the investigational drug. All injections were well tolerated (3 mg in 1.5 ml of sterile saline) with no dose-limiting adverse events, deaths, serious adverse events. The overall average percent change in ischemic index at each evaluation point compared to baseline was statistically significant (Greenhouse-Geisser F=9.456, p=0.004 for the main effect of time), and a larger change was observed when the baseline ischemic index value was high (Greenhouse-Geisser F=10.946, p=0.002 for the time*group interaction).ConclusionsEG-Mirotin was well tolerated and found to reverse the ischemia and leakage of capillaries in the retina caused by diabetes.

A Randomized Phase 2 Trial of Azacitidine ± Durvalumab as First-line Therapy for Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Azacitidine-mediated hypomethylation promotes tumor cell immune recognition but may increase inhibitory immune checkpoint (ICP) molecule expression. We conducted the first randomized phase 2 study of azacitidine plus the ICP inhibitor durvalumab versus azacitidine monotherapy as first-line treatment of higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (HR-MDS). Patients (N=84) received azacitidine 75 mg/m2 subcutaneously (days 1-7) with (Arm A) or without (Arm B) durvalumab 1500 mg intravenously on day 1 every 4 weeks. After a median follow-up of 15.25 months, 8 patients in Arm A and 6 in Arm B remained on treatment. Patients in Arms A and B received a median of 7.9 and 7.0 treatment cycles, respectively, with 73.7% and 65.9% completing ≥4 cycles. The overall response rate (primary endpoint) was 61.9% in Arm A (26/42) and 47.6% in Arm B (20/42; P=0.18), and median overall survival was 11.6 months (95% CI: 9.5, nonevaluable) versus 16.7 months (95% CI: 9.8, 23.5) (P=0.74). Durvalumab-related adverse events (AEs) were reported by 71.1% of patients; azacitidine-related AEs were reported by 82% (A) and 81% (B). Grade 3 or 4 hematologic AEs were reported in (Arm A vs B) 89.5% vs 68.3% of patients. Patients with TP53 mutations tended to have a worse response than patients without these mutations. Azacitidine increased PD-L1 (CD274) surface expression on bone marrow granulocytes and monocytes, but not blasts, in both arms. In summary, combining durvalumab and azacitidine in patients with HR-MDS was feasible, but with more toxicities and without significant improvement in clinical outcomes over azacitidine alone. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02775903