Commentary on: Subcutaneous Face and Neck Lift: A Traditional Method With Definite Effects Among Asians

Author(s):  
Lee L Q Pu
Author(s):  
Ahmed M Hashem ◽  
Rafael A Couto ◽  
Chris Surek ◽  
Marco Swanson ◽  
James E Zins

Abstract Although previous publications have reviewed face and neck-lift anatomy and technique from different perspectives, seldom were the most-relevant anatomical details and widely practiced techniques comprehensively summarized in a single work. As a result, the beginner is left with a plethora of varied publications that require sorting, re-arrangement, and critical reading. A recent survey of US plastic surgery residents and program directors disclosed less facility with facelift surgery when compared to aesthetic surgery of the breast and trunk. To this end four of the widely practiced facelift techniques (ie, MACS-lift, lateral-SMASectomy, extended-SMAS, and composite rhytidectomy) are described in an easy review format. The highlights of each are formatted followed by a summary of complications. Finally, the merits and limitations of these individual techniques are thoroughly compared and discussed.


2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (06) ◽  
pp. 561-569
Author(s):  
Mahmoud Daoud ◽  
Gautham Ullas ◽  
Ullas Raghavan

AbstractPrimary aim of the article is a discussion of the postoperative care after face and neck lift. A brief history of face and neck lift along with different techniques are described. Importance of preoperative assessment is stressed.


2021 ◽  
Vol 35 (02) ◽  
pp. 088-097
Author(s):  
Rami P. Dibbs ◽  
Edward Chamata ◽  
Andrew M. Ferry ◽  
Jeffrey D. Friedman

AbstractFacial rejuvenation procedures have become more commonly performed due to an increasing elderly population and greater general public acceptance. As a result, patients are now increasingly undergoing secondary and tertiary rhytidectomies to treat natural aging and/or to correct complications from prior procedures. Revision face and neck lifts are more complex by nature of the procedure and require a comprehensive preoperative assessment for enhanced outcomes. In this review, we discuss the preoperative evaluation, surgical challenges encountered, primary face and neck lift deformities, and their surgical management for patients undergoing secondary face and neck lifts.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (10) ◽  
pp. e0222324 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Jeon ◽  
Heejun Ahn ◽  
Chang Min Seo ◽  
Je-Hun Lee ◽  
Woo Seob Kim ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Guanhuier Wang ◽  
Runlei Zhao ◽  
Ran Bi ◽  
Hongbin Xie

Abstract Background The mainstream face lifts in western countries always involve the SMAS treatment. Meanwhile, subcutaneous face and neck lift is wildly applied among Asians. Objectives To evaluate outcomes of subcutaneous face and neck lift, including patient-reported and 3D measurement outcomes, and report on details of surgical procedures. Methods Patients who received a subcutaneous face and neck lift from January 2017 to June 2019 were asked to complete FACE-Q scales, and facial information was collected by the Vectra 3D imaging system preoperatively and postoperatively. Volume changes in midface and possible displacement of facial landmarks were measured. The range of dissection and the amount of skin removed were recorded intraoperatively. Results In total, 119 patients (median age 46 years, interquartile range 40 - 53 years) received a subcutaneous face and neck lift. Among them, 88 patients completed pre- and postoperative FACE-Q scales. Patients’ satisfaction with facial subunits improved and wrinkles were significantly relieved (p<0.001). Nineteen patients (38 midface sides) completed 3D image data collection. Postoperatively, zygomatic volume was increased, while nasolabial and lateral cheek volumes were decreased, with the volume change of 2.2 ± 1.3 mL. Mouth, nose, and eye displacements were negligible postoperatively. The widths of skin removed at the middle temporal, front of the sideburns, upper helix, earlobe, and retro-auricular were 13.8±1.9 mm, 19.6±3.1 mm, 27.6±3.9 mm, 16.4±3.9 mm, and 32.2±4.0 mm, respectively. Conclusions Our subcutaneous face and neck lift was effective in relieving nasolabial sagging, improving wrinkles, and achieving facial rejuvenation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document