scholarly journals What Can Breast and Plastic Surgeons Do to Help Fight the Opioid Crisis: The Interpectoral Block for Pain Control Following Aesthetic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Scheflan ◽  
Tanir M Allweis
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Pain Control ◽  
Ultrasound Guidance ◽  
Breast Surgery ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Postoperative Pain Management ◽  
Effective Technique ◽  
Regional Analgesia ◽  
Pain Medications ◽  
Opioid Administration

Abstract With the heightened awareness of the dangers of opioid administration, the importance of providing effective non-opioid postoperative pain management is evident. Regional analgesia for breast surgery has been described, but it is unclear how widely it is utilized. The authors describe a simple block performed during ablative, aesthetic, and reconstructive breast surgery to improve postoperative pain control and significantly decrease the need for postoperative pain medications. The interpectoral (PECS I) block covers the lateral and medial pectoral nerves and can be administered by the anesthesiologist under ultrasound guidance after induction of general anesthesia, or by the surgeon under direct vision, using a blunt cannula, at the time of surgery. The authors have been practicing this technique in every patient undergoing aesthetic, ablative, and reconstructive breast surgery in the last 4 years. In approximately 350 patients, none received opioids after discharge, which was either same day or the following day. The authors provide a brief review of the literature and a detailed description of the technique along with a video demonstrating the procedures. Intraoperative pectoral block is a simple and effective technique for decreasing postoperative pain and analgesic requirements and could be widely adopted as a standard of care in breast surgery.

Written Prescription for Over-the-Counter Nonopioid Pain Medications Does Not Increase the Likelihood of Use after Ambulatory Hand and Upper Extremity Surgery

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel J. Lynch ◽  
James S. Lin ◽  
Kanu S. Goyal
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Upper Extremity ◽  
Pain Control ◽  
Control Program ◽  
Postoperative Pain Control ◽  
Over The Counter ◽  
Unequal Variance ◽  
Pain Medications ◽  
Medication Consumption

Abstract Introduction This study looked to determine how providing written prescriptions of nonopioids affected postoperative pain medication usage and pain control. Materials and Methods Patients undergoing hand and upper-extremity surgery (n = 244) were recruited after the implementation of a postoperative pain control program encouraging nonopioids before opioids. Patients were grouped based on procedure type: bone (n = 66) or soft tissue (n = 178). Patients reported postoperative medication consumption and pain control scores. Two-tailed t-tests assuming unequal variance were performed to look for differences in postoperative pain control and medication consumption between those who were and were not given written prescriptions for nonopioids. Results For both soft tissue and bone procedure patients, a written prescription did not significantly affect patients’ postoperative pain control or medication consumption. Regardless of receiving a written prescription, patients who underwent soft tissue procedures consumed significantly more daily nonopioids than opioids. Conclusion Receiving written prescriptions for nonopioids may not have a significant effect on postoperative pain control or medication consumption. Patients undergoing soft tissue hand and upper extremity procedures may be more likely to consume more daily nonopioids than opioids postoperatively compared to bone procedure patients regardless of whether they receive a written prescription for nonopioids.

scholarly journals Right Breast Mastectomy and Reconstruction with Tissue Expander under Thoracic Paravertebral Blocks in a 12-Week Parturient

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Allen-John Webb ◽  
Paul David Weyker ◽  
Shara Cohn ◽  
Amanda Wheeler ◽  
Jennifer Lee
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Pain Control ◽  
Breast Surgery ◽  
Anesthetic Management ◽  
Healthy Woman ◽  
Tissue Expander ◽  
Postoperative Pain Control ◽  
Tissue Expanders

Paravertebral blocks are becoming increasingly utilized for breast surgery with studies showing improved postoperative pain control, decreased need for opioids, and less nausea and vomiting. We describe the anesthetic management of an otherwise healthy woman who was 12 weeks pregnant presenting for treatment of her breast cancer. For patients undergoing breast mastectomy and reconstruction with tissue expanders, paravertebral blocks offer an anesthetic alternative when general anesthesia is not desired.

How to teach Breast ERAS protocols: Surgical residents’ perspectives and perioperative practices for mastectomy patients.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11033-11033
Author(s):  
Kristen Jogerst ◽  
Taylor Coe ◽  
Nikita Gupta ◽  
Patricia Cronin ◽  
Abbey Fingeret ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pain Management ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Breast Surgery ◽  
Comparative Method ◽  
Postoperative Pain Management ◽  
Structured Interview ◽  
Cohen’S Kappa ◽  
Surgical Residents ◽  
Cohen's Kappa ◽  
Same Day Discharge

11033 Background: Breast enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols emphasize multimodal analgesia to decrease pain and expedite home recovery, but variability remains for same-day discharge and pain management. The purpose of this qualitative study is to examine how residents learn and apply breast surgery ERAS protocols, how they conceptualize pain management for breast surgery patients, and what influences their decision to discharge a patient home on the day of surgery. Methods: A semi-structured interview guide was adapted from existing instruments in the pain management qualitative literature. Surgical residents who rotated on the breast surgery service within the previous 12 months were interviewed by a single researcher. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, de-identified, and independently inductively coded by two researchers. A codebook was developed and refined using the constant comparative method until interrater reliability (Cohen’s kappa) reached greater than 0.9. Codes were grouped into coding categories and explored for thematic analysis. Results: Twelve interviews were completed with plastic and general surgery residents. Participants spanned post-graduate years 1-4. Preferred discharge narcotic regimens for mastectomy patients ranged from 5-30 tablets of 5mg oxycodone and participants rarely reported the same quantity. Ultimately, 365 primary codes were collapsed into 26 parent codes, with a Cohen’s kappa of 0.93. Six emerging themes were identified. Three themes describe how participants learned through a mixture of templated care, formal education, and informal experiential learning. Two themes delineate how residents would teach breast surgery ERAS protocols: by emphasizing buy-in and by connecting the impetus behind ERAS with the implementation in daily workflow. One theme illustrates the patient-centered culture and how that impacts postoperative management and same-day discharges. Conclusions: Residents learn breast surgery ERAS and postoperative pain management from imitating their seniors, observing patient encounters, completing templated orders, and translating concepts from other ERAS services, more so than from a formal lecture. When implementing new same-day discharge protocols for mastectomy patients, it is important to consider how informal learning and local culture influence postoperative pain management and discharge rates.

scholarly journals Post-operative pain management modalities employed in clinical trials for adult patients in LMIC; a systematic review

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gauhar Afshan ◽  
Robyna Irshad Khan ◽  
Aliya Ahmed ◽  
Ali Sarfraz Siddiqui ◽  
Azhar Rehman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Pain Management ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Postoperative Pain Management ◽  
Multimodal Analgesia ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Regional Analgesia ◽  
Post Operative Pain

Abstract Background: Unrelieved postoperative pain afflicts millions each year in low and middle income countries (LMIC). Despite substantial advances in the study of pain, this area remains neglected. Current systematic review was designed to ascertain the types of clinical trials conducted in LMIC on postoperative pain management modalities over the last decade. Methods: A comprehensive search was performed in June 2019 on PubMed, Cochrane Library, CINAHL Plus, and Web of Science databases to identify relevant trials on the management of postoperative pain in LMIC. Out of 1450 RCTs, 108 studies were reviewed for quality evidence using structured form of critical appraisal skill program. Total of 51 clinical trials were included after applying inclusion/exclusion criteria. Results:Results are charted according to the type of surgery. Eleven trials on laparoscopic cholecystectomy used multimodal analgesia including some form of regional analgesia. Different analgesic modalities were studied in 4 trials on thoracotomy, but none used multimodal approach. In 11 trials on laparotomy, multimodal analgesia was employed along with the studied modalities. In 2 trials on hysterectomy, preemptive pregabalin or gabapentin were used for reduction in rescue analgesia. In 13 trials on breast surgical procedures and 10 on orthopaedic surgery, multimodal analgesia was used with some form of regional analgesia. Conclusion: We found that over the past 10 years, clinical trials for postoperative pain modalities have evolved in LMIC according to the current postoperative pain management guidelines i.e. multi-modal approach with some form of regional analgesia. The current review shows that clinical trials were conducted using multimodal analgesia including but not limited to some form of regional analgesia for postoperative pain in LMIC however this research snapshot (of only three countries) may not exactly reflect the clinical practices in all 47 countries. Post Operative Pain Management Modalities Employed in Clinical Trials for Adult Patients in LMIC; A Systematic Review

scholarly journals Post-operative pain management modalities employed in clinical trials for adult patients in LMIC: a systematic review

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gauhar Afshan ◽  
Robyna Irshad Khan ◽  
Aliya Ahmed ◽  
Ali Sarfraz Siddiqui ◽  
Azhar Rehman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Pain Management ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Postoperative Pain Management ◽  
Multimodal Analgesia ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Clinical Practices ◽  
Regional Analgesia ◽  
Rescue Analgesia

Abstract Background: Unrelieved postoperative pain afflicts millions each year in low and middle income countries (LMIC). Despite substantial advances in the study of pain, this area remains neglected. Current systematic review was designed to ascertain the types of clinical trials conducted in LMIC on postoperative pain management modalities over the last decade. Methods: A comprehensive search was performed in June 2019 on PubMed, Cochrane Library, CINAHL Plus, and Web of Science databases to identify relevant trials on the management of postoperative pain in LMIC. Out of 1450 RCTs, 108 studies were reviewed for quality evidence using structured form of critical appraisal skill program. Total of 51 clinical trials were included after applying inclusion/exclusion criteria. Results: Results are charted according to the type of surgery. Eleven trials on laparoscopic cholecystectomy used multimodal analgesia including some form of regional analgesia. Different analgesic modalities were studied in 4 trials on thoracotomy, but none used multimodal approach. In 11 trials on laparotomy, multimodal analgesia was employed along with the studied modalities. In 2 trials on hysterectomy, preemptive pregabalin or gabapentin were used for reduction in rescue analgesia. In 13 trials on breast surgical procedures and 10 on orthopaedic surgery, multimodal analgesia was used with some form of regional analgesia. Conclusion: We found that over the past 10 years, clinical trials for postoperative pain modalities have evolved in LMIC according to the current postoperative pain management guidelines i.e. multi-modal approach with some form of regional analgesia. The current review shows that clinical trials were conducted using multimodal analgesia including but not limited to some form of regional analgesia for postoperative pain in LMIC however this research snapshot (of only three countries) may not exactly reflect the clinical practices in all 47 countries.

scholarly journals An Interactive Pain Application (MServ) Improves Postoperative Pain Management

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Richard Gordon-Williams ◽  
Andreia Trigo ◽  
Paul Bassett ◽  
Amanda Williams ◽  
Stephen Cone ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pain Management ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Nursing Staff ◽  
Pain Control ◽  
Standard Care ◽  
Severe Pain ◽  
Postoperative Pain Management ◽  
Pain Scale ◽  
Opioid Prescription ◽  
Patient Reported

Background. Most patients have moderate or severe pain after surgery. Opioids are the cornerstone of treating severe pain after surgery but cause problems when continued long after discharge. We investigated the efficacy of multifunction pain management software (MServ) in improving postoperative pain control and reducing opioid prescription at discharge. Methods. We recruited 234 patients to a prospective cohort study into sequential groups in a nonrandomised manner, one day after major thoracic or urological surgery. Group 1 received standard care (SC, n = 102), group 2 were given a multifunctional device that fed back to the nursing staff alone (DN, n = 66), and group 3 were given the same device that fed back to both the nursing staff and the acute pain team (DNPT, n = 66). Patient-reported pain scores at 24 and 48 hours and patient-reported time in severe pain, medications, and satisfaction were recorded on trial discharge. Findings. Odds of having poor pain control (>1 on 0–4 pain scale) were calculated between standard care (SC) and device groups (DN and DNPT). Patients with a device were significantly less likely to have poor pain control at 24 hours (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.25, 0.81) and to report time in severe pain at 48 hours (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.47–0.80). Patients with a device were three times less likely to be prescribed strong opioids on discharge (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.95). Interpretation. Using an mHealth device designed for pain management, rather than standard care, reduced the incidence of poor pain control in the postoperative period and reduced opioid prescription on discharge from hospital.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document