scholarly journals Maternal stress to partner quality is linked to adaptive offspring sex ratio adjustment

2011 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 717-722 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah R. Pryke ◽  
Lee A. Rollins ◽  
William A. Buttemer ◽  
Simon C. Griffith
2007 ◽  
Vol 363 (1497) ◽  
pp. 1675-1686 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanna Rutkowska ◽  
Alexander V Badyaev

Differences in relative fitness of male and female offspring across ecological and social environments should favour the evolution of sex-determining mechanisms that enable adjustment of brood sex ratio to the context of breeding. Despite the expectation that genetic sex determination should not produce consistent bias in primary sex ratios, extensive and adaptive modifications of offspring sex ratio in relation to social and physiological conditions during reproduction are often documented. Such discordance emphasizes the need for empirical investigation of the proximate mechanisms for modifying primary sex ratios, and suggests epigenetic effects on sex-determining mechanisms as the most likely candidates. Birds, in particular, are thought to have an unusually direct opportunity to modify offspring sex ratio because avian females are heterogametic and because the sex-determining division in avian meiosis occurs prior to ovulation and fertilization. However, despite evidence of strong epigenetic effects on sex determination in pre-ovulatory avian oocytes, the mechanisms behind such effects remain elusive. Our review of molecular and cytological mechanisms of avian meiosis uncovers a multitude of potential targets for selection on biased segregation of sex chromosomes, which may reflect the diversity of mechanisms and levels on which such selection operates in birds. Our findings indicate that pronounced differences between sex chromosomes in size, shape, size of protein bodies, alignment at the meiotic plate, microtubule attachment and epigenetic markings should commonly produce biased segregation of sex chromosomes as the default state, with secondary evolution of compensatory mechanisms necessary to maintain unbiased meiosis. We suggest that it is the epigenetic effects that modify such compensatory mechanisms that enable context-dependent and precise adjustment of primary sex ratio in birds. Furthermore, we highlight the features of avian meiosis that can be influenced by maternal hormones in response to environmental stimuli and may account for the precise and adaptive patterns of offspring sex ratio adjustment observed in some species.


2020 ◽  
Vol 287 (1926) ◽  
pp. 20192909 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renée C. Firman

A shift from the traditional perspective that maternal stress is invariably costly has instigated recent interest into its adaptive role in offspring sex allocation. Stress generated by social instability has been linked to offspring sex ratio biases that favour the production of female offspring, which converges with the theoretical prediction that mothers in the poor condition are better off investing in daughters rather than sons. However, previous research has failed to disentangle two different processes: the passive consequence of maternal stress on sex-specific mortality and the adaptive effect of maternal stress at the time of conception. Here, I show that exposure to high male density social conditions leads to elevated stress hormone levels and female-biased in utero offspring sex ratios in house mice ( Mus musculus domesticus ), and identify that sex-specific offspring production—not sex-specific mortality—is the mechanism accounting for these sex ratio skews. This outcome reflects the optimal fitness scenario for mothers in a male-dominated environment: the production of daughters, who are guaranteed high mate availability, minimizes male–male competition for their sons. Overall, this study supports the idea that maternal stress has the potential to be adaptive and advances our understanding of how exposure to different social conditions can influence sex allocation in mammals.


The Condor ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 104 (4) ◽  
pp. 881-885
Author(s):  
Shannon M. Janota ◽  
Sheryl Swartz Soukup ◽  
Charles F. Thompson

AbstractThe sex-ratio adjustment hypothesis predicts that females should modify offspring sex ratios according to the potential reproductive success of their offspring under existing ecological conditions. We tested this hypothesis in the polygynous, sexually size-monomorphic House Wren (Troglodytes aedon). Typically, nestling House Wrens that hatch in the first half of the three-month breeding season are heavier and have higher rates of survival and recruitment than those that hatch in the second half of the season. Therefore, the sex-ratio adjustment hypothesis predicts that early broods should be more male biased than later broods, because males in good condition have higher reproductive value than females. As conditions deteriorate, broods should become less male biased because female offspring have higher reproductive value than males in poor condition. Contrary to expectation, there was no seasonal decrease in offspring condition, and the sex ratio of broods was consistently male biased throughout the breeding season. We conclude that the results are consistent with the sex-ratio adjustment hypothesis, because in the year of this study female House Wrens were able to produce offspring in similar (and presumably good) condition throughout the breeding season; therefore, they continued to produce broods that were significantly male biased.Sesgo hacia Machos en el Cociente de Sexos de la Prole en Troglodytes aedonResumen. La hipótesis sobre el ajuste del cociente de sexos predice que las hembras deberían modificar el cociente de sexos de la prole en relación al éxito potencial reproductivo de la prole bajo las condiciones ecológicas existentes. Evaluamos esta hipótesis en Troglodytes aedon, especie polígina y sin diferencias sexuales de tamaño. Típicamente, los pichones de T. aedon que eclosionan en la primera mitad de la estación reproductiva (que dura tres meses) son más pesados y presentan tasas de supervivencia y reclutamiento más altas que aquellos que eclosionan en la segunda mitad de la estación. De este modo, la hipótesis sobre el ajuste del cociente de sexos predice que las camadas tempranas deberían estar más sesgadas hacia los machos que las camadas más tardías, ya que los machos en buena condición tienen un valor reproductivo más alto que las hembras. A medida que la condición se deteriora, las camadas deberían estar menos sesgadas hacia los machos debido a que los vástagos de sexo femenino tienen un valor reproductivo más alto que los machos en mala condición. Contrariamente a lo esperado, no hubo una disminución estacional en la condición de la prole, y el cociente de sexos de las camadas estuvo consistentemente sesgado hacia los machos a lo largo de la estación de cría. Concluimos que los resultados son consistentes con la hipótesis sobre el ajuste del cociente de sexos, ya que durante el año de este estudio las hembras de T. aedon fueron capaces de producir proles en condiciones similares (y presumiblemente buenas) a lo largo de la estación de cría. De este modo, las hembras continuaron produciendo camadas que estuvieron significativamente sesgadas hacia los machos.


2004 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernt-Erik Sæther ◽  
Erling J. Solberg ◽  
Morten Heim ◽  
John E. Stacy ◽  
Kjetill S. Jakobsen ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document