scholarly journals Developing an Ingredient Database of Commercially Packaged Retail Foods (IngIDB), Using the USDA Branded Food Products Database, Illustrated with Food Category ‘Cookies’ (P04-131-19)

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaspreet Ahuja ◽  
Ying Li ◽  
Ermias Haile ◽  
Quynhanh Nguen ◽  
Juhi Williams

Abstract Objectives To develop a database of ingredients used in high-selling commercially packaged retail foods, using the publicly available USDA Branded Food Products Database (BFPD). Methods Nutrient Data Laboratory analyzed 2016 IRI (Information Resources Inc.) market sales data, and identified 32 top food categories that contribute > = 1% based on either total volume/weight or number of products sold in the U.S. These include 5 baked product categories – cookies, crackers, fresh breads and rolls, pastries and doughnuts, and pies and cakes. Ingredient lists for the products contributing over 0.001% of the total weight sold for the category were obtained from BFPD. If information for the product was not available in BFPD, other sources such as manufacturer's website were used for top-selling products (contributing over 0.1% of the total weight sold for the category), with the goal to obtain ingredient lists for at least 70–80% of the products sold by total weight for the category. Individual ingredients listed in the ingredients lists were parsed and reviewed. Many of these ingredients were synonyms, necessitating the need for a thesaurus, to facilitate combining same ingredients described otherwise. A prototype thesaurus was developed for flour and fat ingredients in the food category ‘cookies’. Results For food category ‘cookies’, there are ∼13,500 products available, of which ingredient lists were obtained for 1718 products representing ∼84% of the total cookies sold by weight (BFPD: 1699 products (79%); other sources: 19 top-selling products (4%)), hence, meeting our goal. These 1718 cookie products use about 2500 uniquely described ingredients, as per the ingredients lists on the labels. These ingredients include about 30 different types of enriched flours described in ∼ 220 unique ways, including spelling errors etc on the ingredient lists. The thesaurus will need to be expanded to other ingredients. Conclusions The publicly available BFPD can be a useful resource for developing an Ingredient Database for commercially packaged retail foods. The database will be used to prioritize ingredients that need to be chemically analyzed for nutrient information, and provide insights on ‘What is in the foods we eat in America? ’ Funding Sources N/A.

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gina McKeon ◽  
William Hallman

Abstract Objectives The objective of this study is to characterize food products that make front-of-package protein claims. The study will also determine how these protein-labeled products compare nutritionally to similar products without protein claims. Methods Products with front-of-package protein claims were analyzed using Label Insight, an online product database of label information and product images for over 330,000 foods. Product categories with the greatest proportion of products with protein claims were determined. An assessment of which type of protein claim (e.g., “Good Source of Protein,” “5 g of protein per serving”) is present most frequently was performed. Logistic regression was used to predict the types of claims that are made based on the type of product (e.g., yogurt, cereal). Additionally, within those product categories that contain a high proportion of protein-labeled products, a cross-sectional comparison of the calorie, protein, fat, sugar, and sodium content of food products with and without front-of-package protein labels was completed. Results Preliminary data reveal that the three food categories with the greatest proportion of protein claims relative to all products in that category are: Dairy, Frozen Food, and Cereal & Breakfast Foods. These categories are comprised of 15.33%, 14.32%, and 13.83% of products with protein claims, respectively. Preliminary results for the nutritional comparisons of cereal using Mann-Whitney U tests revealed that median protein per 100 g and median total fat per 100 g were both statistically significantly higher in the cereals with protein labels than in the cereal without protein labels, (U = 79, 616.5, P < .001 and U = 31,186.5, P < .001, respectively). Conclusions Our preliminary findings indicate that foods making protein claims are common in multiple product categories and that some nutrients may be higher in those that have a protein label. Ongoing quantitative analyses are further evaluating the extent of these nutritional differences. Funding Sources N/A.


Author(s):  
Ayanda Agnes Lebele

In the quest to develop more innovative customer-focused library services, the Botswana International University of Science and Technology (BIUST) Library embarked on the development of robust initiatives that involved the engagement of various stakeholders. The emerging consultative and engaging trend is premised on the key values of facilitating access to information and demand-driven inclusive library services. The paper presents how the BIUST Library engages stakeholders in the development of multiple and flexible opportunities to access and use information. In doing so, it describes the recreation of internal library structures, space, and processes in a way that accommodates and demonstrates the categories and functional roles of different types of library stakeholders. The paper further points to how the stakeholders’ cultures and systems create a divide or imbalance in the access and usage of library services. The paper also argues for a need to define library stakeholders and develop engagement strategies that are entity and initiative specific.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document