scholarly journals Dissociation of Verbal Working Memory System Components Using a Delayed Serial Recall Task

2001 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 1003-1014 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. M. Chein
2018 ◽  
Vol 72 (3) ◽  
pp. 457-471 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulrike Körner ◽  
Jan P Röer ◽  
Axel Buchner ◽  
Raoul Bell

Four experiments tested conflicting predictions about which components of the serial-recall task are most sensitive to auditory distraction. Changing-state (Experiments 1a and 1b) and deviant distractor sounds (Experiments 2a and 2b) were presented in one of four different intervals of the serial-recall task: (1) during the first half of encoding, (2) during the second half of encoding, (3) during the first half of retention, or (4) during the second half of retention. According to the embedded-processes model, both types of distractors should interfere with the encoding and rehearsal of targets in the focus of attention. According to the duplex-mechanism account, changing-state distractors should interfere only with rehearsal, whereas deviant distractors should interfere only with encoding. Inconsistent with the latter view, changing-state and deviant distractor sounds interfered with both the encoding and the retention of the targets. Both types of auditory distraction were most pronounced during the second half of encoding when the increasing rehearsal demands had to be coordinated with the continuous updating of the rehearsal set. These findings suggest that the two types of distraction disrupt similar working memory mechanisms.


2005 ◽  
Vol 100 (2) ◽  
pp. 354-356 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. J. Brosnan

Serial recall tasks assess the capacity of verbal short-term memory. The perception of computing as an acquirable skill rather than a fixed ability affected performance upon computer-based serial recall tasks but did not affect performance on comparable pencil-and-paper tasks. Computerized versions of traditional assessments should control for this.


2009 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryu-ichiro Hashimoto ◽  
KangUk Lee ◽  
Alexander Preus ◽  
Robert W. McCarley ◽  
Cynthia G. Wible

2017 ◽  
Vol 60 (11) ◽  
pp. 3342-3364 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Nittrouer ◽  
Amanda Caldwell-Tarr ◽  
Keri E. Low ◽  
Joanna H. Lowenstein

Purpose Verbal working memory in children with cochlear implants and children with normal hearing was examined. Participants Ninety-three fourth graders (47 with normal hearing, 46 with cochlear implants) participated, all of whom were in a longitudinal study and had working memory assessed 2 years earlier. Method A dual-component model of working memory was adopted, and a serial recall task measured storage and processing. Potential predictor variables were phonological awareness, vocabulary knowledge, nonverbal IQ, and several treatment variables. Potential dependent functions were literacy, expressive language, and speech-in-noise recognition. Results Children with cochlear implants showed deficits in storage and processing, similar in size to those at second grade. Predictors of verbal working memory differed across groups: Phonological awareness explained the most variance in children with normal hearing; vocabulary explained the most variance in children with cochlear implants. Treatment variables explained little of the variance. Where potentially dependent functions were concerned, verbal working memory accounted for little variance once the variance explained by other predictors was removed. Conclusions The verbal working memory deficits of children with cochlear implants arise due to signal degradation, which limits their abilities to acquire phonological awareness. That hinders their abilities to store items using a phonological code.


2008 ◽  
Vol 103 (1) ◽  
pp. 214-218 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashley Harness ◽  
Lorri Jacot ◽  
Shauna Scherf ◽  
Adam White ◽  
Jason E. Warnick

In two separate studies, sex differences in modal-specific elements of working memory were investigated by utilizing words and pictures as stimuli. Groups of men and women performed a free-recall task of words or pictures in which 20 items were presented concurrently and the number of correct items recalled was measured. Following stimulus presentation, half of the participants were presented a verbal-based distraction task. On the verbal working-memory task, performance of men and women was not significantly different in the no-distraction condition. However, in the distraction condition, women's recall was significantly lower than their performance in the no-distraction condition and men's performance in the distraction condition. These findings are consistent with previous research and point to sex differences in cognitive ability putatively resulting from functional neuroanatomical dissimilarities. On the visual working-memory task, women showed significantly greater recall than men. These findings are inconsistent with previous research and underscore the need for further research.


2005 ◽  
Vol 180 (4) ◽  
pp. 634-643 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine M. Tipper ◽  
Tara A. Cairo ◽  
Todd S. Woodward ◽  
Anthony G. Phillips ◽  
Peter F. Liddle ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 15 (9) ◽  
pp. 634-640 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nelson Cowan ◽  
Zhijian Chen ◽  
Jeffrey N. Rouder

NeuroImage ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 79-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric H. Schumacher ◽  
Erick Lauber ◽  
Edward Awh ◽  
John Jonides ◽  
Edward E. Smith ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document