scholarly journals TMS-Adaptation Reveals Abstract Letter Selectivity in the Left Posterior Parietal Cortex

2009 ◽  
Vol 19 (10) ◽  
pp. 2321-2325 ◽  
Author(s):  
Z. Cattaneo ◽  
F. Rota ◽  
V. Walsh ◽  
T. Vecchi ◽  
J. Silvanto
Author(s):  
Takehiro Minamoto ◽  
Miyuki Azuma ◽  
Ken Yaoi ◽  
Aoi Ashizuka ◽  
Tastuya Mima ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 581-593 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilke Öztekin ◽  
Brian McElree ◽  
Bernhard P. Staresina ◽  
Lila Davachi

Functional magnetic resonance imaging was used to identify regions involved in working memory (WM) retrieval. Neural activation was examined in two WM tasks: an item recognition task, which can be mediated by a direct-access retrieval process, and a judgment of recency task that requires a serial search. Dissociations were found in the activation patterns in the hippocampus and in the left inferior frontal gyrus (LIFG) when the probe contained the most recently studied serial position (where a test probe can be matched to the contents of focal attention) compared to when it contained all other positions (where retrieval is required). The data implicate the hippocampus and the LIFG in retrieval from WM, complementing their established role in long-term memory. Results further suggest that the left posterior parietal cortex (LPPC) supports serial retrieval processes that are often required to recover temporal order information. Together, these data suggest that the LPPC, the LIFG, and the hippocampus collectively support WM retrieval. Critically, the reported findings support accounts that posit a distinction between representations maintained in and outside of focal attention, but are at odds with traditional dual-store models that assume distinct mechanisms for short- and long-term memory representations.


2009 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 1204-1214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carmel Mevorach ◽  
Glyn W. Humphreys ◽  
Lilach Shalev

Attentional cues can trigger activity in the parietal cortex in anticipation of visual displays, and this activity may, in turn, induce changes in other areas of the visual cortex, hence, implementing attentional selection. In a recent TMS study [Mevorach, C., Humphreys, G. W., & Shalev, L. Opposite biases in salience-based selection for the left and right posterior parietal cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 9, 740–742, 2006b], it was shown that the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) can utilize the relative saliency (a nonspatial property) of a target and a distractor to bias visual selection. Furthermore, selection was lateralized so that the right PPC is engaged when salient information must be selected and the left PPC when the salient information must be ignored. However, it is not clear how the PPC implements these complementary forms of selection. Here we used on-line triple-pulse TMS over the right or left PPC prior to or after the onset of global/local displays. When delivered after the onset of the display, TMS to the right PPC disrupted the selection of the more salient aspect of the hierarchical letter. In contrast, left PPC TMS delivered prior to the onset of the stimulus disrupted responses to the lower saliency stimulus. These findings suggest that selection and suppression of saliency, rather than being “two sides of the same coin,” are fundamentally different processes. Selection of saliency seems to operate reflexively, whereas suppression of saliency relies on a preparatory phase that “sets up” the system in order to effectively ignore saliency.


2012 ◽  
Vol 50 (14) ◽  
pp. 3729-3735 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vanessa Krause ◽  
Shahid Bashir ◽  
Bettina Pollok ◽  
Anuhya Caipa ◽  
Alfons Schnitzler ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chihiro Sutoh ◽  
Daisuke Matsuzawa ◽  
Yoshiyuki Hirano ◽  
Makiko Yamada ◽  
Sawako Nagaoka ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document