scholarly journals Fecal Microbiota Transplant for Relapsing Clostridium difficile Infection Using a Frozen Inoculum From Unrelated Donors: A Randomized, Open-Label, Controlled Pilot Study

2014 ◽  
Vol 58 (11) ◽  
pp. 1515-1522 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilan Youngster ◽  
Jenny Sauk ◽  
Christina Pindar ◽  
Robin G. Wilson ◽  
Jess L. Kaplan ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 531-533 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Popa ◽  
Mihaela Laszlo ◽  
Lidia Ciobanu ◽  
Elena Ucenic ◽  
Manuela Mihalache ◽  
...  

A fecal microbiota transplant has proved to be an extremely effective method for patients with recurrent infections with Clostridium difficile. We present the case of a 65-year-old female patient with multiple Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) relapses on the rectal remnant, post-colectomy for a CDI-related toxic megacolon. The patient also evidenced associated symptomatic Clostridium difficile vaginal infection. She was successfully treated with serial fecal “minitransplants” (self-administered at home) and metronidazole ovules.Abbreviations: GI: gastrointestinal; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging; CDI: Clostridium difficile infection; FMT: fecal microbiota transplant.


2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (7) ◽  
pp. 929-935
Author(s):  
Abdulmajeed A. Albarrak ◽  
Bhupinder S. Romana ◽  
Suleyman Uraz ◽  
Mohamad H. Yousef ◽  
Alhareth A. Juboori ◽  
...  

Background:The rising incidence of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in the general population has been recognized by health care organizations worldwide. The emergence of hypervirulent strains has made CDI more challenging to understand and treat. Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients are at higher risk of infection, including CDI.Objective:A diagnostic approach for recurrent CDI has yet to be validated, particularly for IBD patients. Enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for toxins A and B, as well as glutamate dehydrogenase EIA, are both rapid testing options for the identification of CDI. Without a high index of suspicion, it is challenging to initially differentiate CDI from an IBD flare based on clinical evaluation alone.Methods:Here, we provide an up-to-date review on CDI in IBD patients. When caring for an IBD patient with suspected CDI, it is appropriate to empirically treat the presumed infection while awaiting further test results.Results:Treatment with vancomycin or fidaxomicin, but not oral metronidazole, has been advocated by an expert review from the clinical practice update committee of the American Gastroenterology Association. Recurrent CDI is more common in IBD patients compared to non-IBD patients (32% versus 24%), thus more aggressive treatment is recommended for IBD patients along with early consideration of fecal microbiota transplant.Conclusion:Although the use of infliximab during CDI has been debated, clinical experience exists supporting its use in an IBD flare, even with active CDI when needed.


2017 ◽  
Vol 129 (3) ◽  
pp. 507-509 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bejan J. Saeedi ◽  
Doree Gardner Morison ◽  
Colleen S. Kraft ◽  
Tanvi Dhere

2019 ◽  
Vol 156 (6) ◽  
pp. S-907-S-908
Author(s):  
Courtney E. Stull ◽  
Brandon Fritz ◽  
Jennifer Hardy ◽  
Francesca Gutierrez Tabor ◽  
Frank I. Scott ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S333-S333
Author(s):  
Monique Bidell ◽  
Gregory Novak ◽  
Gurkirat Singh ◽  
Benjamin Bratek ◽  
Odirichukwu Duru ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. IDSA guidelines recommend oral vancomycin (VAN) for the treatment of CDI, although doses used in practice vary substantially. The purpose of this study was to determine differences in outcomes between patients treated with high dose (HD; ≥250 mg four times daily [QID]) vs. standard dose (SD; 125 mg QID) VAN for CDI. Methods This multicenter study evaluated patients at two hospitals in Albany, NY diagnosed with CDI and treated with oral VAN between January 2013 and August 2017. Hospitalized patients were included if: age ≥18 years, positive C. difficile toxin polymerase chain reaction (PCR), symptomatic infection (e.g., new onset or increased frequency of loose stools), and received ≥48 hours of VAN QID. Patients were excluded if: received ≥48 hours of metronidazole prior to VAN initiation, VAN per rectum, required surgical intervention ≤48 hours from PCR, had a history of fecal microbiota transplant, received ≥1 dose of fidaxomicin or tigecycline prior to or within 48 hours from PCR, or died ≤48 hours from PCR. The primary outcome was 90-day CDI recurrence; secondary outcomes included 30-day all-cause mortality and 90-day readmission. Variables with a P-value <0.2 in univariate analysis were evaluated in multivariate (MV) analyses. Results Four hundred fifty-eight patients were included (site 1: 270; site 2: 188). Two hundred twenty-four patients received SD VAN (48.9%); 234 received HD VAN [250 mg QID: 199 (43.5%); 500 mg QID: 35 (7.6%)]. Baseline demographics were similar between groups. Patients treated with HD were more likely to present with colitis (19.2 vs. 29.5%, P = 0.01) and have higher infection severity based on IDSA (P < 0.01), Zar (P < 0.01), and American College of Gastroenterology (P < 0.02) criteria. Modified APACHE II scores were similar between SD and HD groups (median: 12.2 vs. 12.9, P = 0.17). MV analysis identified no difference in 90-day recurrence with HD (OR 1.65, P = 0.13) after controlling for solid tumor cancers, immunosuppression, and IDSA severity. Similarly, no significant differences between SD and HD were observed for 30-day mortality and 90-day readmission. Conclusion No differences in recurrence, mortality, or readmission were identified between SD and HD oral VAN for the treatment of CDI, though HD VAN patients primarily received 250 mg QID. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document