scholarly journals Therapeutic Drug Monitoring is More Cost-Effective than a Clinically Based Approach in the Management of Loss of Response to Infliximab in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: An Observational Multicentre Study

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 539-540 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henit Yanai ◽  
Iris Dotan
Keyword(s):  
Inflammatory Bowel Disease ◽  
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring ◽  
Multicentre Study ◽  
Bowel Disease ◽  
Drug Monitoring ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Therapeutic Drug ◽  
Loss Of Response ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel

scholarly journals The Utility of Infliximab Therapeutic Drug Monitoring among Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Concerns for Loss of Response: A Retrospective Analysis of a Real-World Experience

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert A. Mitchell ◽  
Constantin Shuster ◽  
Neal Shahidi ◽  
Cherry Galorport ◽  
Mari L. DeMarco ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Inflammatory Bowel Disease ◽  
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring ◽  
Bowel Disease ◽  
Drug Monitoring ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Therapeutic Drug ◽  
Loss Of Response ◽  
Remission Rates ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel ◽  
Group 3

Background. Infliximab (IFX) therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) allows for objective decision making in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and loss of response. Questions remain about whether IFX TDM improves outcomes. Methods. Patients with IBD who had IFX TDM due to concerns for loss of response were considered for inclusion. Serum IFX trough concentration and anti-drug antibody (ADA) concentrations were measured. Patients were grouped by TDM results: group 1, low IFX/high ADA; group 2, low IFX/low ADA; group 3, therapeutic IFX. Changes in management were analyzed according to groupings; remission rates were assessed at 6 months. Results. 71 patients were included of whom 37% underwent an appropriate change in therapy. Groups 1 (67%) and 2 (83%) had high adherence compared to only 9% in group 3. At 6 months, 57% had achieved remission. More patients who underwent an appropriate change in therapy achieved remission, though this did not reach statistical significance (69% versus 49%; P=0.098). Conclusions. A trend towards increased remission rates was associated with appropriate changes in management following TDM results. Many patients with therapeutic IFX concentrations did not undergo an appropriate change in management, potentially reflecting a lack of available out-of-class options at the time of TDM or due to uncertainty of the meaning of the reported therapeutic range.

scholarly journals Advances in Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Biologic Therapies for Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akshay Kapoor ◽  
Eileen Crowley
Keyword(s):  
Inflammatory Bowel Disease ◽  
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring ◽  
Bowel Disease ◽  
Drug Monitoring ◽  
Drug Exposure ◽  
Therapeutic Drug ◽  
Dose Individualization ◽  
Loss Of Response ◽  
Fixed Weight ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel

In the current era of treat-to-target strategies, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has emerged as a potential tool in optimizing the efficacy of biologics for children diagnosed with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The incorporation of TDM into treatment algorithms, however, has proven to be complex. “Proactive” TDM is emerging as a therapeutic strategy due to a recently published pediatric RCT showing a clear benefit of “proactive” TDM in anti-TNF therapy. However, target therapeutic values for different biologics for different disease states [ulcerative colitis (UC) vs. Crohn's disease (CD)] and different periods of disease activity (induction vs. remission) require further definition. This is especially true in pediatrics where the therapeutic armamentarium is limited, and fixed weight-based dosing may predispose to increased clearance leading to decreased drug exposure and subsequent loss of response (pharmacokinetic and/or immunogenic). Model-based dosing for biologics offers an exciting insight into dose individualization thereby minimizing the chances of losing response. Similarly, point-of-care testing promises real-time assessment of drug levels and individualized decision-making. In the current clinical realm, TDM is being used to prolong drug durability and efficacy and prevent loss of response. Ongoing innovations may transform it into a personalized tool to achieve optimal therapeutic endpoints.

scholarly journals Immunogenicity of biologics used in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease: A review

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Mariam Bqain ◽  
Alex Efimov ◽  
David Baker ◽  
Angray S. Kang
Keyword(s):  
Inflammatory Bowel Disease ◽  
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring ◽  
Bowel Disease ◽  
Drug Monitoring ◽  
Clinical Symptoms ◽  
British Society ◽  
Therapeutic Drug ◽  
Loss Of Response ◽  
Alternative Drug ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW: Here we critically evaluate the literature on immunotherapy failure in inflammatory bowel disease patients. In particular anti-drug antibody production, and subsequently loss of response as the primary cause of immunotherapy failure in IBD patients. The benefits of shifting from the “standard” empirical dose escalation approach to therapeutic drug monitoring with anti-TNFα therapy is explored. RECENT FINDINGS: The American Gastroenterology Association and British Society of Gastroenterology both currently recommend the use of reactive therapeutic drug monitoring to guide treatment, following loss of response in inflammatory bowel disease patients with active disease. However, further research is required to prove the efficacy of a proactive therapeutic drug monitoring approach alone in remitted IBD patients. SUMMARY: A combination of personalised monitoring approach for anti-drug antibodies and therapeutic drug monitoring could provide beneficial treatment outcome for people with inflammatory bowel disease by predicting drug failure prior to clinical symptoms and allowing timely switching to an alternative drug.

scholarly journals P449 Cost Effectiveness of a Proactive Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Strategy in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease Receiving Infliximab

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S445-S446
Author(s):  
J Doherty ◽  
R Varley ◽  
M Healy ◽  
C Dunne ◽  
F Mac Carthy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Inflammatory Bowel Disease ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring ◽  
Bowel Disease ◽  
Drug Monitoring ◽  
Cost Savings ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Therapeutic Drug ◽  
Dose Increase ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel

Abstract Background Proactive therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has not demonstrated improved therapy outcomes compared with clinically-based dosing strategies. While the use of proactive TDM incurs additional assay-related costs this strategy may be cost-effective due to TDM-driven therapy dose de-escalation and discontinuation. Methods We aimed to assess if proactive-TDM is cost-effective in clinical practice. A proactive TDM strategy was utilized in our unit with infliximab (IFX) and antibody-to-infliximab (ATI) levels assessed at trough in all inflammatory bowel disease(IBD) patients receiving IFX. Baseline demographics and IFX dosing schedules were documented. Patients were grouped based on disease activity status. Patients with IFX levels outside therapeutic range had dosing adjusted as appropriate. IFX dose adjustments were not protocolized and were at physicians discretion. IFX dosing regimens following proactive TDM were documented and net effect on IFX infusions number over the subsequent year extrapolated. Increase or decrease in drug-related costs on an annualized basis were estimated. Results 108 patients were included. Median age 36 years. 46% were female. 36% had ulcerative colitis, 60% Crohn’s disease. 35% were receiving concomitant immunomodulators. 56% were in remission at the time of TDM. 44%, 30% and 26% had IFX levels < 3 µg/mL, 3 – 7 µg/mL and > 7 µg/mL. IFX levels were significantly lower in patients with active disease compared with those in remission(p=0.008). Following proactive TDM assessment 37%, 11%, 36%, 13%, 2% and 1% of patients had no treatment change, therapy discontinuation, interval shortening, interval lengthening, dose increase and dose decrease respectively. Cost-effectiveness analysis focused on patients in remission (n=59). The use of proactive TDM-based IFX dosing resulted in a projected annualized reduction of 19.5 and 28.5 infusions due to IFX discontinuation and interval lengthening; the projected annualized increase in infusions was 39.1 and 4.3 due to IFX interval shortening and dose increase. This resulted in a net projected reduction of 4.7 IFX infusions per annum. Utilizing publicly available list prices for originator and biosimilar IFX and accounting for assay cost, projected cost savings resulting from proactive-TDM was 9105.0 and 6840.7 Euro per annum. Conclusion Proactive TDM in IBD patients in remission resulted in a modest reduction in the projected annualized number of infusions in our unit with consequent minor drug-related cost savings. Proactive-TDM encouraged cost-effective prescribing of IFX, however, the effect was minor. The frequency at which proactive TDM should be performed and whether subsequent rounds of proactive-TDM would continue to deliver similar cost savings is uncertain.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document