DOP46 Extended induction treatment with mirikizumab in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis: results from a Phase 2 trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S054-S054
Author(s):  
W J Sandborn ◽  
M Ferrante ◽  
B R Bhandari ◽  
E Berliba ◽  
T Hibi ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 156 (6) ◽  
pp. S-1094
Author(s):  
William J. Sandborn ◽  
Marc Ferrante ◽  
Bal R. Bhandari ◽  
Elina Berliba ◽  
Toshifumi Hibi ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7544-7544
Author(s):  
Charles Herbaux ◽  
Herve Ghesquieres ◽  
Reda Bouabdallah ◽  
Stephanie Guidez ◽  
Emmanuel Gyan ◽  
...  

7544 Background: R/R iNHL treatment remains challenging. Atezolizumab (ATE) and obinutuzumab (OBI) are monoclonal antibodies acting respectively to inhibit T-lymphocyte exhaustion or by inducing lymphoma cells cytotoxicity, whereas venetoclax (VEN) is a small molecule inhibiting BCL-2. Combining tumor-targeted therapies with agents that enhance anti-tumor immunity represents an attractive treatment paradigm. This LYSA sponsored multicenter phase 2 trial (NCT03276468) evaluated ATE, OBI and VEN combination in R/R B-cell lymphomas. Herein, we present primary efficacy and safety data from the iNHL cohort including Follicular Lymphoma (FL) and Marginal Zone Lymphomas (MZL). Methods: Patients ≥18 years with biopsy-confirmed R/R FL and MZL who failed at least one line of therapy were eligible. OBI was given IV at 1 g on day (D) 1, 8 and 15 of cycle (C) 1 and on D1 from C2 to C8 every 3 weeks. ATE was given IV, 1.2 g every 3 weeks, started at D2 of C1, then administered at D2 of each cycle for 24 cycles. VEN was given orally at 800 mg/D at full dose, starting on D8C1 for 24 cycles. The primary endpoint was the Overall Response Rate (ORR) evaluated by Lugano criteria at the end of induction (EOI) after 8 cycles of ATE, OBI and VEN (M6) or at premature treatment discontinuation. Results: At the time of the primary analysis (08 Jan 2021), 78 patients were enrolled. FL cohort (n = 58): the median follow-up was 14.5 months. Main baseline characteristics were: Ann Arbor Stage III/IV, 85.7%; FLIPI HR, 47.3%; > 2 prior lines of therapy, 32.1%; and exposed to ASCT, 30.4%. The ORR on PET scan at EOI was measured at 53.6% [41.8%-65.1%], including 30.4% of CMR. 37 patients (63%) received the full induction treatment. MZL cohort (n = 20; 13 nMZL, 5 eMZL, 2 sMZL): the median follow-up was 11.9 months. Main baseline characteristics were: Ann Arbor Stage IV, 100%; bone marrow infiltration, 38.9%; ≥ 2 extra-nodal sites, 50%; and > 2 prior lines of therapy, 22.2%. The ORR on CT scan at EOI was measured at 66.76% [44.6%-84.4%], including 16.7% of CR and 50.0% PR. 11 patients (55%) received the full induction treatment. At time of the present analysis, responses in the 2 cohorts seem durable with only 21,4% of responders who have reported relapse/progression. Out of the 78 pts, a total of 55 (70.5%) pts experienced grade 3–4 adverse event (AE) and 1 patient experienced an AE that led to discontinuation of any drug. Main AE of grade 3 or more were hematologic cytopenias, with only one febrile neutropenia (1.3%). Three pts experienced immune-related AE (1 grade 2 myositis and 2 grade 3 colitis), no tumor lysis syndrome was observed. Conclusions: ATE, OBI and VEN triplet appears to be well tolerated, with no unexpected toxicity brought by the combination. The ORR at EOI seems to be comparable to other innovative regiments in this setting, with durable responses to date. Clinical trial information: NCT03276468.


2011 ◽  
Vol 140 (5) ◽  
pp. S-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
William J. Sandborn ◽  
Subrata Ghosh ◽  
Julian Panes ◽  
Ivana Vranic ◽  
Chinyu Su ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S410-S411
Author(s):  
A Vickers ◽  
A Nag ◽  
B Devine ◽  
B E Sands ◽  
R Panaccione ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Clinicians, patients, payers and policymakers require relevant, high-quality evidence to support decision-making regarding the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). In the absence of head-to-head trials, network meta-analysis (NMA) can be used to compare treatments. We conducted an NMA to compare the efficacy of ontamalimab (anti-MAdCAM-1) using its phase 2 data, with all biologics and novel small molecules for which induction study data on endoscopic response were available. Methods A systematic literature review was conducted in November 2017 to identify published randomised controlled trials of induction treatment in patients with moderate-to-severe UC. An NMA of the identified studies was performed using random-effects models and methods based on NICE guidance. Odds ratios and 95% credible intervals were calculated to describe the relative differences between treatments and placebo in terms of efficacy in inducing endoscopic response. Results were examined by anti-TNF status (naïve vs. experienced). Results In total, 15 phase 2 and phase 3 induction studies of the following agents were available and included: adalimumab (160/80mg), etrolizumab (100mg and 300mg), golimumab (200/100mg), infliximab (5mg), ontamalimab (22.5mg and 75mg), ozanimod (0.5mg and 1mg), tofacitinib (10mg) and vedolizumab (300mg). The definition of endoscopic response (improvement) in all trials was a Mayo endoscopic subscore of ≤1. Homogeneity between studies was good, enabling pooling of results. Figure 1 shows odds ratios for induction of endoscopic response with treatments relative to placebo in anti-TNF-naïve and -experienced patients. All treatments performed significantly better than placebo in anti-TNF-naïve patients, with the exception of both doses of etrolizumab and ozanimod 0.5 mg. Significant differences between some treatments were observed; specifically, ontamalimab 22.5 mg (p = 0.0277), tofacitinib 10 mg (p = 0.0233) and infliximab 5 mg (p = 0.0047) were all superior to adalimumab 160/80 mg. Conclusion This study suggests that ontamalimab, infliximab and tofacitinib could be superior to adalimumab in inducing endoscopic healing, although it was conducted before any large-scale head-to-head trials of these drugs. Furthermore, large variances due to differing endpoint timings, the combination of phase 2 and phase 3 data, and lack of control for placebo response rates preclude firm conclusions being drawn.


Author(s):  
William J. Sandborn ◽  
Marc Ferrante ◽  
Bal R. Bhandari ◽  
Elina Berliba ◽  
Toshifumi Hibi ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 146 (5) ◽  
pp. S-240
Author(s):  
Caroline Looney ◽  
Franklin Fuh ◽  
Meina T. Tang ◽  
Xiaohui Wei ◽  
Mary E. Keir ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 84 (6) ◽  
pp. 1136-1145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arnab Mukherjee ◽  
Anasuya Hazra ◽  
Mike K. Smith ◽  
Steven W. Martin ◽  
Diane R. Mould ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 158 (6) ◽  
pp. S-284-S-285
Author(s):  
Boyd Steere ◽  
Klaus Gottlieb ◽  
Jochen Schmitz ◽  
Richard Higgs ◽  
Bochao Jia ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document