DOP88 Thiopurine and allopurinol combination therapy and the risk of adverse outcomes and step-up medical therapy in inflammatory bowel disease patients: a nationwide Danish cohort study

Abstract Background Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) is a class of chronic immune-mediated diseases. Biologics have revolutionized the treatment of IBD. Existing literature suggests significant variation exists in the use of biologic treatment among physicians, from provider-specific prescribing to completion of the pre-biologic workup. These differences may influence the effectiveness of achieving and maintaining long-term remission. Clinical care pathways may serve to standardize the use of biologics in the treatment of IBD leading to improvements in patient outcomes and consistency of care provided from different specialists. Aims To determine if the use of biologics to treat IBD managed within a standardized biologic care pathway (BCP) is safer and more effective compared to the current standard of care. Methods This was a retrospective, real-world cohort study of a prospectively implemented evidence-based BCP at the Nova Scotia Collaborative IBD (NSCIBD) program between 2015 and 2019. Patient inclusion criteria consisted of any adult with a diagnosis of IBD (including Crohn’s Disease, ulcerative colitis, IBD-Unclassified) aged 18 years or older who was managed within the NSCIBD program. Preliminary descriptive analyses of the data are presented. Data collection is ongoing and multivariate analyses will be presented in full at CDDW. Results In total 249 patients were included in the cohort study (111 BCP patients, 138 non-BCP patients). The mean age was 49 years (range of 17–86 years). Sixty-nine percent (171/249) of patients were diagnosed with CD, 28% (70/249) with UC, and 3% (8/249) with IBD-U. The mean duration of disease was 13 years (range of 0–36 years). Use of combination therapy was similar between the cohorts with 64% of BCP patients (n=102) and 63% of non-BCP patients (n=123) on combination therapy. Thirty-eight percent of the BCP cohort required dosing interval changes vs. 29% in the non-BCP cohort (0.24 fold higher in BCP cohort). Seventy-one percent of the BCP patients were exposed to TDM vs. 41% of the non-BCP cohort (0.40-fold more TDM in pathway cohort). Although 34% of BCP patients and 38% of non-BCP cohort patients reached clinical remission (n=103 and 125, respectively), 38% of BCP patients and 21% of non-BCP patients achieved endoscopic remission (0.5-fold lower in the non-BCP cohort), (n=29 and 53, respectively). Conclusions Preliminary analyses suggest patients managed within a BCP have their biologic management guided more often by the results of TDM and objective biomarkers than those not managed within a BCP. Although clinical remission was observed to be similar between the cohorts, attainment of endoscopic remission was more likely amongst patients managed within the BCP. Additional multivariate analyses will be presented at CDDW with a larger cohort size. Funding Agencies None

Download Full-text

A164 PATTERNS IN MEDICAL THERAPY AND CLINICAL OUTCOMES IN PATIENTS WITH CONCOMITANT INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE AND PRIMARY SCLEROSING CHOLANGITIS: A SINGLE CENTRE RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS

Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology ◽

10.1093/jcag/gwab002.162 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 173-174

Author(s):

K Donaldson ◽

R A Mitchell ◽

R A Enns ◽

B Bressler ◽

G Rosenfeld ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Inflammatory Bowel Disease ◽

Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis ◽

Medical Therapy ◽

Bowel Disease ◽

Sclerosing Cholangitis ◽

Adverse Outcomes ◽

Low Grade ◽

Strict Adherence ◽

Increased Risk ◽

Inflammatory Bowel

Abstract Background Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is characterized by pancolitis with rectal sparing and is associated with an increased risk of colorectal and biliary malignancies. Currently, pharmacologic management of IBD in the setting of PSC is the same as in IBD alone. Aims To assess patterns in medical therapy, and incidence of adverse outcomes in patients with concomitant IBD and PSC. Methods A retrospective review was conducted on all PSC-IBD patients followed between January 2010 and June 2018. The Endoscopic Mayo Score was used to grade IBD severity in PSC-ulcerative colitis (UC). Results 69 patients were identified, 44 (63.8%) were male. The mean ages of IBD and PSC diagnosis were 28.6 (SD 14.9) and 37.0 (SD 18.9) years, respectively. The median length of follow up was 12 (range 2–49) years. 52 (75.4%) patients had UC, and 17 (24.6%) had Crohn’s disease (CD). 28 (87.5%) PSC-UC patients had pancolitis, and 4 (12.5 %) had proctitis. Among those with pancolitis, 8 (28.6%) had relative rectal sparing. 4 (14.3%) patients had more severe inflammation proximally, whereas only 1 (3.6%) had more severe distal inflammation. 23 (82.1%) patients had the same degree of inflammation throughout. 14 (93.3%) PSC-CD patients had colitis/ileocolitis and 1 (6.7%) had ileitis. Among those with PSC-UC, 16 (50.0%), 12 (37.5%), and 4 (12.5%) patients had grade 1, 2, and 3 disease, respectively. 62 (89.9%) PSC-IBD patients were treated with aminosalicylates, and 26 (37.7%) with biologics at some point in their IBD course. 26 (37.7%) were treated with aminosalicylates alone. 4 (5.8%) did not require any IBD therapy. Cholangiocarcinoma, colorectal cancer, and gallbladder cancer developed in 8 (11.6%), 1 (1.4%), and 1 (1.4%) PSC-IBD patients, respectively. 16 (23.2%) patients required partial or total colectomy. Indication for surgery was inflammation or stenosis, dysplasia, and neoplasia in 13 (81.3%), 2 (12.5%), and 1 (6.3%) patients, respectively. Conclusions The majority of this cohort had UC with mild disease activity. Pancolitis was common, with frequent rectal sparing and more severe right-sided inflammation. Despite the predominance of low-grade colitis, a large portion of patients required treatment with biologics. The incidence of adverse outcomes underscores the need for strict adherence to recommended surveillance practices. Low grade endoscopic activity, typical of the quiescent IBD course in PSC-IBD, may mask low grade histologic inflammation, which in turn may contribute to the increased risk of colonic neoplasia. Further studies are needed to determine the best management strategy for IBD in patients with PSC. Funding Agencies None

Download Full-text

Tu1186 Risk of Invasive Pneumococcal Infection in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Nationwide Danish Cohort Study

Gastroenterology ◽

10.1016/s0016-5085(14)62807-9 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 146 (5) ◽

pp. S-778 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Bjørn Kantsø ◽

Jacob Simonsen ◽

Steen Hoffmann ◽

Palle Valentiner-Branth ◽

Andreas M. Petersen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Inflammatory Bowel Disease ◽

Cohort Study ◽

Bowel Disease ◽

Pneumococcal Infection ◽

Inflammatory Bowel ◽

Danish Cohort ◽

Invasive Pneumococcal Infection

Download Full-text

P338 The effectiveness of a standardised biologic care pathway in the management and treatment of inflammatory bowel disease

Journal of Crohn s and Colitis ◽

10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjz203.467 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S325-S325

Author(s):

N Willett ◽

C G Heisler ◽

N Nazer ◽

B Currie ◽

K Phalen-Kelly ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Inflammatory Bowel Disease ◽

Cohort Study ◽

Combination Therapy ◽

Bowel Disease ◽

Clinical Remission ◽

Multivariate Analyses ◽

Care Pathway ◽

Endoscopic Remission ◽

Inflammatory Bowel ◽

The Mean

Abstract Background inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a class of chronic immune-mediated diseases. Biologics have revolutionised the treatment of IBD. Existing literature suggests significant variation exists in the use of biologic treatment among physicians, from provider-specific prescribing to completion of the pre-biologic workup. These differences may influence the effectiveness of achieving and maintaining long-term remission. Clinical care pathways can standardise the use of biologics, improve patient outcomes, and increase consistency of care. The aim of the project was to determine whether the use of biologics to treat IBD managed within a standardised biologic care pathway (BCP) is safer and more effective compared with the current standard of care. Methods This was a retrospective, real-world cohort study of a prospectively implemented evidence-based BCP at the Nova Scotia Collaborative IBD (NSCIBD) program between 2015 and 2019. Patient inclusion criteria consisted of an adult with a diagnosis of IBD (including Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis, IBD-Unclassified) aged 18 years or older who was managed within the NSCIBD program. Preliminary descriptive analyses of the data are presented. Data collection is ongoing and multivariate analyses will be presented in full at ECCO. Results In total 249 patients were included in the cohort study (111 BCP patients, 138 non-BCP patients). The mean age was 49 years (range of 17–86 years). Sixty-nine per cent (171/249) of patients were diagnosed with CD, 28% (70/249) with UC, and 3% (8/249) with IBD-U. The mean duration of disease was 13 years (range of 0–36 years). Use of combination therapy was similar between the cohorts with 64% of BCP patients (n = 102) and 63% of non-BCP patients (n = 123) on combination therapy. Thirty-eight per cent of the BCP cohort required dosing interval changes vs. 29% in the non-BCP cohort (0.24 fold higher in BCP cohort). Seventy-one per cent of the BCP patients were exposed to TDM vs. 41% of the non-BCP cohort (0.40-fold more TDM in pathway cohort). Although 34% of BCP patients and 38% of non-BCP cohort patients reached clinical remission (n = 103 and 125, respectively), 38% of BCP patients and 21% of non-BCP patients achieved endoscopic remission (0.5-fold lower in the non-BCP cohort), (n = 29 and 53, respectively). Conclusion Preliminary analyses suggest patients managed within a BCP have their biologic management guided more often by the results of TDM and objective biomarkers than those not managed within a BCP. Although clinical remission was observed to be similar between the cohorts, attainment of endoscopic remission was more likely amongst patients managed within the BCP. Additional multivariate analyses will be presented at ECCO with a larger cohort size.

Download Full-text