Determinants of left ventricular hypertrophy and dysfunction in adults with coarctation of aorta

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Egbe ◽  
R Vojjini ◽  
K Banala

Abstract Background Several coarctation of aorta (COA) severity indices are used for timing of COA intervention, and to define severity of residual coarctation post-intervention. However, it is unclear how many of these COA indices are required in order to recommend intervention, and what degree of residual coarctation results in suboptimal recovery of the left ventricle (LV). Our aim was to assess the correlation between different COA indices and effects of chronic LV pressure overload (LV hypertrophy, diastolic and systolic dysfunction), and to determine the effect of residual coarctation on LV reverse remodeling after COA intervention. Methods COA severity indices were defined as Doppler COA gradient, systolic blood pressure, upper-to-lower-extremity systolic blood pressure gradient, aortic isthmus ratio. LV remodeling indices were defined as LV mass index (LVMI), LV global longitudinal strain (LVGLS), e' and E/e'. LV reverse remodeling was defined as the difference between indices obtained pre-intervention and 5-years post-intervention (delta LVMI, e', E/e', LVGLS). Results Of the COA indices analyzed in 546 adult COA patients, aortic isthmus ratio had the strongest correlation with LVMI (β±standard error −28.3±14.1, p<0.001), LVGLS (1.51±0.42, p=0.005), e' (3.11±1.10, p=0.014), and E/e' (−13.4±6.67, p=0.008). Residual aortic isthmus ratio also had the strongest correlation with LV reverse remodeling, and residual aortic isthmus ratio <0.7 was predictive of suboptimal LV reverse remodeling post-intervention. Conclusion Considering the known prognostic implications of LV remodeling and reverse remodeling in response to pressure overload, these results support the use of aortic isthmus ratio for timing of COA intervention, and for prognostication post-intervention. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Author(s):  
Alexander C Egbe ◽  
William R Miranda ◽  
Heidi M Connolly

Abstract Aims Several coarctation of aorta (COA) severity indices are used for timing of COA intervention, and to define severity of residual coarctation post-intervention. However, it is unclear how many of these COA indices are required in order to recommend intervention, and what degree of residual coarctation results in suboptimal recovery of the left ventricle (LV). Our aim was to assess the correlation between different COA indices and effects of chronic LV pressure overload (LV hypertrophy, diastolic, and systolic dysfunction), and to determine the effect of residual coarctation on LV reverse remodelling after COA intervention. Methods and results COA severity indices were defined as Doppler COA gradient, systolic blood pressure (SBP, upper-to-lower-extremity SBP gradient, aortic isthmus ratio. LV remodelling indices were defined as LV mass index (LVMI), LV global longitudinal strain (LVGLS), e′ and E/e′. LV reverse remodelling was defined as the difference between indices obtained pre-intervention and 5-year post-intervention (delta LVMI, e′, E/e′, LVGLS). Of the COA indices analysed in 546 adult COA patients, aortic isthmus ratio had the strongest correlation with LVMI (β ± standard error −28.3 ± 14.1, P < 0.001), LVGLS (1.51 ± 0.42, P = 0.005), e′ (3.11 ± 1.10, P = 0.014), and E/e′ (−13.4 ± 6.67, P = 0.008). Residual aortic isthmus ratio also had the strongest correlation with LV reverse remodelling, and residual aortic isthmus ratio <0.7 was predictive of suboptimal LV reverse remodelling post-intervention. Conclusion Considering the known prognostic implications of LV remodelling and reverse remodelling in response to pressure overload, these results support the use of aortic isthmus ratio for timing of COA intervention, and for prognostication post-intervention.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Egbe ◽  
K Banala ◽  
R Vojjini

Abstract Background Ambulatory systolic blood pressure (SBP) is more sensitive than resting-SBP in detecting hypertension in patients with coarctation of aorta (COA) and patients with idiopathic hypertension. A recent study showed that compared to patients with idiopathic hypertension with similar resting-SBP, COA patients had lower arterial compliance, and hence experienced higher SBP per unit increase in stroke volume during exercise. The purpose of this study was to compare resting vs ambulatory-SBP relationship between COA patients and non-COA patients (with and without hypertension), and to determine if ambulatory-SBP had better correlation with left ventricular (LV) remodeling as compared to resting-SBP. Methods Case-control study of 106 COA patients and 106 patients with idiopathic hypertension (ControlHTN+ group) matched by age, sex, body mass index and resting-SBP. Resting/ambulatory BP relationship in COA patients and patients with idiopathic hypertension were also compared to that of 19 patients without hypertension (ControlHTN- group). LV remodeling was assessed using LV mass index, e', and E/e'. Results Although the COA and ControlHTN+ groups had similar resting-SBP (by design), the COA group had a higher ambulatory-SBP and a higher prevalence of masked hypertension (30% vs 12%, p<0.001). There was a stronger correlation between ambulatory-SBP (as compared to resting-SBP) and LVMI (r=0.36 vs r=0.55, p=0.042), and average E/e' (r=0.42 vs r=0.59, p=0.046), in the COA group but not the ControlHTN+ group. There was no difference in the resting/ambulatory BP relationship between ControlHTN+ and ControlHTN- groups, but both groups were significantly different from the COA group. Conclusion These results highlight the unique differences in disease pathophysiology between hypertension in patients with COA and those with idiopathic hypertension, and also suggest that ambulatory-SBP may be a more accurate measure of LV pressure overload in COA patients. This underscores the potential limitations of relying on resting-SBP alone for clinical decision making. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Egbe ◽  
R Vojjini ◽  
K Banala

Abstract Background Transcatheter stent therapy is as effective as surgery in producing acute hemodynamic improvement in patients with coarctation of aorta (COA). However, left ventricular (LV) remodeling after transcatheter COA intervention has not been systematically investigated. The purpose of this study was to compare remodeling of LV structure and function after transcatheter stent therapy vs surgical therapy for COA. Methods LV remodeling was assessed at 1, 3 and 5-years post-intervention using: LV mass index (LVMI), LV end-diastolic dimension, LV ejection fraction, LV global longitudinal strain (LVGLS), LV e' and E/e'. Results There were 44 and 128 patients in the transcatheter and surgical groups respectively. Compared to the surgical group, the transcatheter group had less regression of LVMI (−4.6 [95% CI: −5.5 to −3.7] vs −7.3 [95% CI: −8.4 to −6.6] g/m2, p<0.001), less improvement in LVGLS (2.1 [95% CI 1.8–2.4] vs 2.9 [95% CI: 2.6–3.2]%, p=0.024) and e' (1.0 [95% CI: 0.7–1.2] vs 1.5 [95% CI: 1.3–1.7] cm/s, p=0.009) at 5 years post-intervention. Exploratory analysis showed a correlation between change in LVMI and LVGLS, and between change in LVMI and e', and this correlations were independent of the type of intervention received. Conclusions Transcatheter stent therapy was associated with less remodeling of LV structure and function during mid-term follow-up. As transcatheter stent therapy become more widely used in the adult COA population, there is a need for ongoing clinical monitoring to determine if these observed differences in LV remodeling translates to differences in clinical outcomes. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None


Author(s):  
Alexander C. Razavi, ◽  
Camilo Fernandez ◽  
Jiang He ◽  
Tanika N. Kelly ◽  
Marie Krousel-Wood ◽  
...  

Background: Elevated cardiovascular disease risk factor burden is a recognized contributor to poorer cognitive function; however, the physiological mechanisms underlying this association are not well understood. We sought to assess the potential mediation effect of left ventricular (LV) remodeling on the association between lifetime systolic blood pressure and cognitive function in a community-based cohort of middle-aged adults. Methods: Nine hundred sixty participants of the Bogalusa Heart Study (59.2% women, 33.8% black, aged 48.4±5.1 years) received 2-dimensional echocardiography to quantify relative wall thickness, LV mass, and diastolic and systolic LV function; and a standardized neurocognitive battery to assess memory, executive functioning, and language processing. Multivariable linear regression assessed the association of cardiac structure and function with a global composite cognitive function score, adjusting for traditional cardiovascular disease risk factors. Mediation analysis assessed the effect of LV mass index on the association between lifetime systolic blood pressure burden and cognitive function. Results: There were 233 (24.3%) and 136 (14.2%) individuals with concentric LV remodeling and concentric LV hypertrophy, respectively. Each g/m 2.7 increment in LV mass index was associated with a 0.03 standardized unit decrement in global cognitive function ( P =0.03). Individuals with concentric LV remodeling and isolated diastolic dysfunction had the poorest cognitive function, and a greater ratio between early mitral inflow velocity and early diastolic mitral annular velocity (E/e’) was associated with poorer cognitive function, even after adjustment for LV mass index (B=−0.12; P =0.03). A total of 18.8% of the association between lifetime systolic blood pressure burden and midlife cognitive function was accounted for by LV mass index. Conclusions: Cardiac remodeling partially mediates the association between lifespan systolic blood pressure burden and adult cognition in individuals without dementia or clinical cardiovascular disease. Slowing or reversing the progression of cardiac remodeling in middle-age may be a novel therapeutic approach to prevent cognitive decline.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
O J Sletten ◽  
J Aalen ◽  
F H Khan ◽  
C K Larsen ◽  
K Inoue ◽  
...  

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Norwegian Health Association Background Global longitudinal strain (GLS) is used for detection of subclinical left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, for example when screening for chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity. A relative percentage reduction in GLS ≥8% is considered abnormal. However, as GLS is load-dependent, modest increases in afterload can potentially prove sufficient to cause clinical implication. In contrast, global myocardial work (GMW) which incorporates afterload, may be more accurate in detecting LV-dysfunction. Purpose We investigated the effect of increased afterload on GLS, and if GMW may be a more accurate parameter of myocardial function during increased afterload. Methods In 20 healthy individuals (age 49 ± 11 years (mean ± SD), 10 men), blood pressure was increased by a 3 minute arithmetic mental stress test. GLS was measured by speckle tracking echocardiography and LV ejection fraction (EF) by biplane Simpson. GMW was calculated from LV pressure-strain analysis using a non-invasive estimate for LV pressure (LVP). Results During the afterload-elevation, systolic blood pressure increased by 25 ± 16 mmHg (p < 0.01), and heart rate by 16 ± 13 bpm (p < 0.01). This was followed by a decrease in EF from 62 ± 5 to 59 ± 5% (p < 0.01) and GLS from 21.9 ± 2.2 to 20.8 ± 2.0% (p < 0.01). In contrast, GMW increased from 2052 ± 278 to 2382 ± 388 mmHg·% (p < 0.01). In 5 of 20 (25%) individuals, the relative percentage reduction of GLS was >8%, despite an increase in GMW. The figure shows an individual example during rest and afterload-elevation, where an increase in systolic blood pressure of 16 mmHg was associated with a 9% relative percentage reduction in GLS, but a small increase in GMW as illustrated by the loop areas. Conclusions This study demonstrated that a modest increase in afterload can result in significant reduction in GLS, that may lead to overdiagnosis of LV-dysfunction. GMW did not decrease, suggesting it has a better specificity in patients at risk for subclinical LV dysfunction. Future studies should investigate if GMW is more accurate than strain in detecting LV-dysfunction. Abstract 158 Figure.


Author(s):  
Xiaoyan Chen ◽  
Qingmei Yang ◽  
Jianxiu Fang ◽  
Haifeng Guo

Background A lower systolic blood pressure (SBP) target reduces major cardiovascular events and mortality from any cause in geriatric hypertension. However, the effect of different SBP targets on left ventricular (LV) function remains unclear. This study aimed to determine changes in LV strain in older hypertensive patients after 1 year of different SBP goals, and to evaluate its effects on LV function in this population. Methods We studied 313 hypertensive adults aged 60 years or older after 1 year of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial. They were divided into the intensive group (target SBP: 110–130 mmHg) and the standard group (target SBP: 130–150 mmHg). All participants underwent echocardiography within 1 week after enrollment and 1 year after participating in the study. Global longitudinal strain (GLS) of the LV (endocardial, middle, and epicardial layer: GLS-end, GLS-mid, and GLS-epi, respectively) and improvement of GLS at 1 year (ΔGLS-end, ΔGLS-mid, and ΔGLS-epi) were measured. Results At 1 year, GLS-end in the intensive group was decreased compared with that before the trial (−23.78%±3.10% vs −22.58%±3.11%, P<0.05). The ΔGLS-end and ΔGLS-mid in the intensive group were higher than those in the standard group (both P<0.05). Moreover, SBP at 1 year and an angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist were independent factors that affected ΔGLS-end. Conclusions These trial results suggest that a lower SBP target is beneficial for LV myocardial function of older hypertensive patients at 1 year.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Egbe ◽  
K Banala ◽  
R Vojjini

Abstract Background Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is more sensitive than resting BP assessment in detecting hypertension in patients with coarctation of aorta (COA). However, it is not known whether ABPM provides a better measure of left ventricular (LV) pressure load and LV remodeling as compared to resting BP. LV pressure overload is the lynchpin in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular mortality in COA patients, because it leads to LV remodeling, LV dysfunction and heart failure, which sets-the-stage for cardiovascular death. Therefore identifying a sensitive clinical metric that reflects LV pressure load and LV remodeling, is an important step towards optimizing antihypertensive therapy to prevent LV dysfunction and mortality. We hypothesized that ambulatory systolic BP (SBP) has better correlation with arterial load and LV remodeling indices as compared to resting SBP. Methods Our study cohort comprised of adults with isolated COA without significant residual coarctation (Doppler peak velocity ≤2.5 m/sec), aortic or mitral valve disease. All patients underwent BP measurement at rest, followed by ABPM. Arterial load (LV pressure load) was assessed using Doppler-derived effective arterial elastance index (EAI). LV remodeling was assessed using: LV mass index (LVMI), and E/e'. We divided the cohorts into 4 categories (normotensive, masked, white-coat, and overt hypertension). Results Of the 106 patients (male 69 [65%); age 39±11 years), 98 (93%) had prior COA intervention at 6±5 years. Resting SBP was 132±17, daytime ambulatory SBP was 142±16, and nighttime ambulatory SBP was 128±12 mmHg. The mean arterial load and LV remodeling indices were: EAI 3.4±0.8 mmHg/ml·m2, LVMI 106±21 g/m2, and E/e'11±4. Compared to resting SBP, ambulatory SBP had better correlation with EAI, LVMI, and E/e'. EAI, LVMI and E/e' were significantly different between hypertension categories (Figure 1). Conclusions In this study, we demonstrated that ambulatory SBP had better correlations with arterial load and LV remodeling indices as compared to resting SBP. This suggests that ambulatory SBP was a more robust metric of LV pressure overload and remodeling, and can improve detection of vascular stiffness, LV hypertrophy and elevated LV filling pressure as compared to resting SBP. The results of the current study have important clinical implications with regards to initiation and titration of antihypertensive therapy. If ABPM is used as the gold standard for diagnosis of hypertension, the masked hypertension group (who would have been misclassified as normotensive based on resting SBP alone) will qualify for antihypertensive therapy. Additionally, since ambulatory SBP had better correlation with LV remodeling indices, perhaps titration of antihypertensive therapy using ABPM will potentially reduce the risk of LV hypertrophy and dysfunction due to hypertension. Figure 1 Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document