scholarly journals Case report: intravascular ultrasound sonography-guided re-entry technique in crushed stent

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Mario Iannaccone ◽  
Umberto Barbero ◽  
Michele De Benedictis ◽  
Fabrizio D’ascenzo

Abstract Background Stent thrombosis (ST) is a rare, but potentially fatal complication. Procedural problems, such as stent under-dimension/under-expansion or dual antiplatelet drug resistance may result into ST. These conditions are more frequent during primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Case summary A 60-year-old male patient presented to our hospital with an inferior STEMI. In the emergency department, a dual antiplatelet therapy was administered with ticagrelor 180 mg and aspirin 250 mg IV. During the observation, the patient experienced a ventricular fibrillation. Urgent coronary angiography showed an occlusion of the proximal right coronary artery. Thrombus aspiration was performed followed by implantation of one drug-eluting stent. After 45 min early ST occurred and was treated by immediate thrombus aspiration and post-dilatation. Intravascular ultrasound sonography (IVUS) showed severe strut malapposition due to a partial crush after post-dilatation. Since it was not possible to directly insert the first guidewire in the stent lumen, the IVUS probe was placed between the vessel wall and the crushed stent to guide the manoeuvre. Discussion Crushed stent is a rare complication, being caused by an incorrect passage of the guidewire between the stent’s struts and the vessel wall in case of severe underexpansion. In this case, an IVUS-guided re-entry could be an option to gain the stent true lumen and avoid a second stent implantation.

2014 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-111
Author(s):  
S Munwar ◽  
AHMW Islam ◽  
S Talukder ◽  
AQM Reza ◽  
T Ahmed ◽  
...  

Background: Aim of the study was to evaluate the primary procedural success of percutaneous coronary intervention of unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis using either Bare-metal stents or drug eluting stent. Methods: Total 33 patients were enrolled in this very preliminary non-randomized prospective cohort study. Among them, Male: 25 and Female: 8. Total 35 stents were deployed. Mean age were for Male: 59 yrs, for Female: 62 yrs. Associated coronary artery diseases risk factors were dyslipidemia, High Blood pressure, Diabetes Mellitus, Positive family history for coronary artery diseases and smoking. Results: Among the study group; 26 (78%) were Dyslipidemic, 24(70%) were hypertensive; 17 (51.5%) patients were Diabetic, 11(33%) were smoker and 7(21%) patients had family history of Ischaemic heart disease. Female patients were more obese (BMI M 26: F 27) and developed coronary artery diseases in advance age. Common stented territory were left main: 20 (60%), Left main to left anterior descending artery 7 (22%) and Left main to left circumflex artery 6 (18%). Average length and diameter of stent was 3.5 and 18 mm respectively. Stent used: Bare Metal Stent 5 (15%), Drug Eluting Stent: 28 (85%). Among the different Drug Eluting Stents, Everolimus eluting stents were 11 (39.3%), Sirolimus eluting 10(35.7%), Paclitaxel eluting 3 (10.7%), Biolimus eluting 3 (10.7%) and Zotarolimus eluting1 (3.6%). In the present study, overall survival outcome was 94% (31 patient), mortality of cardiac cause 3% (1 patient) and 1 patient (3%) died of hepatocellular carcinoma. Conclusion: Our study has shown that percutaneous coronary intervention of the unprotected left main is a safe and effective alternative to Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/cardio.v6i2.18349 Cardiovasc. j. 2014; 6(2): 107-111


2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 11
Author(s):  
Sudheer Koganti ◽  
◽  
◽  
◽  
Tushar Kotecha ◽  
...  

Intracoronary imaging has the capability of accurately measuring vessel and stenosis dimensions, assessing vessel integrity, characterising lesion morphology and guiding optimal percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Coronary angiography used to detect and assess coronary stenosis severity has limitations. The 2D nature of fluoroscopic imaging provides lumen profile only and the assessment of coronary stenosis by visual estimation is subjective and prone to error. Performing PCI based on coronary angiography alone is inadequate for determining key metrics of the vessel such as dimension, extent of disease, and plaque distribution and composition. The advent of intracoronary imaging has offset the limitations of angiography and has shifted the paradigm to allow a detailed, objective appreciation of disease extent and morphology, vessel diameter, stent size and deployment and healing after PCI. It has become an essential tool in complex PCI, including rotational atherectomy, in follow-up of novel drug-eluting stent platforms and understanding the pathophysiology of stent failure after PCI (e.g. following stent thrombosis or in-stent restenosis). In this review we look at the two currently available and commonly used intracoronary imaging tools – intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography – and the merits of each.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document