scholarly journals One-stage aortic replacement for type A aortic dissection: using a Vasoring and a conventional elephant trunk graft

2019 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 189-196
Author(s):  
Jeng Wei ◽  
Yung-Tsai Lee ◽  
Ching-Wen Wu
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Dissection ◽  
Aortic Arch ◽  
Vascular Graft ◽  
Open Surgery ◽  
Vascular Ring ◽  
False Lumen ◽  
Type A ◽  
Elephant Trunk ◽  
Type A Aortic Dissection ◽  
Aortic Replacement

AbstractOBJECTIVESWe used a vascular ring connector (Vasoring) and a conventional elephant trunk graft for complete repair in open surgery for type A aortic dissection. This report described the immediate and mid-term results of this new technique.METHODSWe used a rigid titanic ring as a stent in the vascular graft for rapid sutureless anastomosis in the reconstruction of type A aortic dissection.RESULTSA total of 65 consecutive patients with Stanford type A aortic dissection underwent open surgery performed by a single surgeon from November 2007 to February 2017. All patients underwent aortic reconstruction with vascular grafts and Vasorings (21 patients in the ascending aorta and 44 patients in the total aortic arch). For total aortic arch replacement, we implanted the conventional vascular graft in the proximal descending thoracic aorta as an elephant trunk graft. Concomitant procedures included the Bentall procedure (9 patients), the David operation (6 patients), coronary artery bypass grafting (9 patients), heart transplantation (1 patient), mitral valve replacement (2 patients) and endovascular aortic repair (1 patient). The mean duration of postoperative endotracheal intubation was 17.0 ± 11.8 h. The average blood loss was 520 ± 743 ml, and 25% of patients required no blood transfusion. The in-hospital mortality rate was 6%.CONCLUSIONSThe combined use of the vascular ring connector and the conventional elephant trunk graft may reduce bleeding and pump time, stop the blood flow in the false lumen and allow the 1-stage total arch replacement to be performed safely. The conventional elephant trunk graft is free from stent graft-induced new entry.

scholarly journals Repair of residual aortic dissections with frozen elephant trunk technique

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 419-425
Author(s):  
Mustafa Akbulut
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Dissection ◽  
False Lumen ◽  
Type A ◽  
Acute Type ◽  
Frozen Elephant Trunk ◽  
Elephant Trunk ◽  
Type A Aortic Dissection ◽  
Aortic Replacement ◽  
Elephant Trunk Procedure

Background: In this study, we present our mid-term results of reoperation with the frozen elephant trunk procedure due to patent false lumen-related complications in patients previously undergoing supracoronary aortic repair for acute type A aortic dissection. Methods: Between January 2013 and September 2018, a total of 23 patients (17 males, 6 females; mean age 51.5±9.7 years; range, 30 to 67 years) who underwent ascending aortic replacement due to type A aortic dissection and, later, frozen elephant trunk procedure for residual distal dissection were included. For diagnostic purposes and follow-up, computed tomography angiography was performed in all patients, and both re-entry and aortic diameters were evaluated. Echocardiography was used to evaluate cardiac function and valve pathologies. Results: The Ishimaru zone 0 (n=11, 47.8%), Ishimaru zone 1 (n=1, 4.3%), Ishimaru zone 2 (n=4, 17.4%), and Ishimaru zone 3 (n=7, 30.4%) were used for frozen elephant trunk stent graft fixation. The mean duration of cardiopulmonary bypass and antegrade selective cerebral perfusion was 223.9±71.2 min and 88.9±60.3 min, respectively. In-hospital mortality was 13%, while there was one (4.3%) aortic-related death and four (17.4%) re-interventions during follow-up. Conclusion: Early repair should be considered in the presence of persistent dissections due to alarmingly high mortality rates of reoperations. Reoperation with the frozen elephant trunk procedure has acceptable results and the decision of the procedure to be performed should be based on preoperative risk factors of the patient.

scholarly journals Different aortic arch surgery methods for type A aortic dissection: clinical outcomes and follow-up results

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 254-262
Author(s):  
Yunxing Xue ◽  
Jun Pan ◽  
Hailong Cao ◽  
Fudong Fan ◽  
Xuan Luo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Dissection ◽  
Aortic Arch ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Type A ◽  
Frozen Elephant Trunk ◽  
Elephant Trunk ◽  
Type A Aortic Dissection ◽  
Aortic Arch Surgery

Abstract OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical outcomes and follow-up results among 5 main aortic arch surgery methods for type A aortic dissection in a single centre. METHODS From 2002 to 2018, 958 type A aortic dissection patients who received surgical repair were divided into 5 groups according to the arch surgery method: hemiarch replacement (n = 206), island arch replacement (n = 54), total arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk (n = 425), triple-branched stent (n = 39) and fenestrated stent (n = 234). The indications for the different arch methods were related to the patient’s preoperative status, the location and extent of the dissection and the surgical ability of the surgeons. A comparative study was performed to identify the differences in the perioperative data, and the Kaplan–Meier analysis was used to assess the long-term survival and reintervention rates. Thirty matched surviving patients that were included in each group completed Computed tomography angiography to determine long-term reshaping effect. RESULTS The 30-day mortality rate was 15.8%, and there was no difference among the 5 groups (P = 0.848). The follow-up survival rates were similar among the 5 groups (P = 0.130), and the same was true for patients without reintervention (P = 0.471). In the propensity matching study, patients with stents (frozen elephant trunk, triple-branched stent, fenestrated stent) had a slower aortic dilation rate and a higher ratio of thrombosis in the false lumen at the descending aortic and abdominal aortic levels than patients without stents. CONCLUSIONS No standard method is available for arch surgery, and indications and long-term effects should be identified with clinical data. In our experiences, simpler surgical procedures could reduce mortality in critically ill patients and stents in the distal aorta could improve long-term reshape effects.

scholarly journals ­­ A modified frozen elephant trunk technique for acute Stanford type A aortic dissection

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shi-bo Song ◽  
Po-yuan Hu ◽  
Xi-jie Wu ◽  
Yong Sun ◽  
Shi-hao Cai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Dissection ◽  
Aortic Arch ◽  
Type A ◽  
Frozen Elephant Trunk ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Elephant Trunk ◽  
Descending Aorta ◽  
Type A Aortic Dissection ◽  
Elephant Trunk Technique ◽  
Frozen Elephant Trunk Technique

Abstract Background Acute Stanford type A aortic dissection is a lethal event with a high mortality rate and requires emergency intervention. The goal of salvage surgery is to keep the patient alive by addressing the problems of severe aortic regurgitation, tamponade, primary tear and malperfusion of organs,and, if possible, to prevent the late dissection-related complications in the proximal and downstream aorta. No standard treatment or techniques have been determined for this disease. We aim to describe a modified elephant trunk technique for acute type A aortic dissection and report the short-term outcomes of this surgical technique. Methods From February 2018 to August 2019, 16 patients who were diagnosed with acute Stanford type A aortic dissection underwent surgery with the modified frozen elephant trunk technique procedure at Xiamen Heart Centre (9men; age, 59.21±11.67 years). All perioperative variables were recorded and analyzed. We measured the diameters of the ascending aorta, aortic arch and descending aorta on the bifurcation of the pulmonary and abdominal aortas and compared the diameters at admission, before discharge, and 3 months after discharge. Results Fifteen patients (93.8%)had hypertension and poor blood control management. Operative mortality was 6.25%. The primary tears were located in the lesser curve of the aortic arch in 5 patients (31.3%), in the ascending aorta in 9 patients (56.3%), and no entry was found in 2 patients (12.5%). The dissection extended to the iliac artery in 14 patients (87.6%) and to the distal descending aorta in 2 patients (12.5%). The time of cardiopulmonary bypass(CPB),cross-clamping and cerebral perfusion were 215± 40.5,140.8±32.3, and 23±6 minutes, respectively. Aortic valve plasty was performed in 15 patients (93.8%). Additionally, the Bentall procedure and coronary artery repair were performed in 1 patient each (6.3%), respectively. The diameters at all levels were greater before discharge than those when on admission to the hospital, except for the diameter of the aortic arch. After 3 months, the diameters at the aortic arch, descending aorta of the diaphragm, bifurcation of the pulmonary artery had increased, but the diameter at the bifurcation level of the common iliac artery had changed little. Only the diameter of the distal stent aorta had increased significantly. Conclusion The modified frozen elephant trunk technique for acute Stanford type A aortic dissection is safe and feasible, and it could be used for organ malperfusion as well. Short-term outcomes are encouraging, but long-term outcomes require further investigation.

Simplified Elephant Trunk Graft Technique for Aortic Arch Replacement

2002 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 374-375 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shinji Miyamoto ◽  
Tetsuo Hadama ◽  
Hirofumi Anai ◽  
Hidenori Sako ◽  
Tomoyuki Wada ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Aneurysm ◽  
Aortic Dissection ◽  
Aortic Arch ◽  
Acute Aortic Dissection ◽  
False Lumen ◽  
Distal Anastomosis ◽  
Elephant Trunk ◽  
Aortic Arch Replacement ◽  
Aortic Replacement

We refined the elephant trunk graft to facilitate and reinforce the distal anastomosis in aortic replacement operations. A cuff is created in a single four-branch graft, which is used for the distal anastomosis; the trunk below the cuff is inserted into the distal aortic stump. This method is feasible for repairing extensive aortic aneurysm with a fragile wall and for treating acute aortic dissection where thromboocclusion of the remaining false lumen is desired.

scholarly journals The frozen elephant trunk technique for acute retrograde type A aortic dissection: preliminary results

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 813-819
Author(s):  
Daisuke Kaneyuki ◽  
Kenji Mogi ◽  
Hiroyuki Watanabe ◽  
Masayoshi Otsu ◽  
Manabu Sakurai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Dissection ◽  
False Lumen ◽  
Type A ◽  
Neurological Complications ◽  
Total Arch Replacement ◽  
Frozen Elephant Trunk ◽  
Elephant Trunk ◽  
Type A Aortic Dissection ◽  
Enhanced Computed Tomography

Abstract OBJECTIVES Our goal was to determine the early and midterm outcomes after total arch replacement with the frozen elephant trunk (FET) technique compared to those of the conventional elephant trunk (ET) technique for acute retrograde type A aortic dissection. METHODS Between 2012 and 2019, a total of 49 patients had total arch replacement for acute retrograde type A aortic dissection. Patients were divided into the conventional ET (n = 17) and FET (n = 32) groups. The false lumen status was evaluated using enhanced computed tomography (CT) 1 week postoperatively. The diameter of the downstream aorta was evaluated annually using CT. The median follow-up period was 29 months. RESULTS Preoperative data and neurological complications were not significantly different in the 2 groups. The diameter and length of the ET prosthesis were significantly larger and longer in the FET group. The overall early mortality rate was 10.2% (5/49) with no differences between the 2 groups. The mean follow-up period was significantly longer in the conventional ET group. The rates of freedom from aortic events at 3 years were significantly lower in the FET group. At the level of the distal arch, postoperative false lumen patency was significantly lower and the follow-up aortic diameter was significantly smaller in the FET group. CONCLUSIONS The FET technique facilitates false lumen thrombosis and aortic remodelling at the distal arch level, with fewer adverse aortic events during the follow-up period with acceptable early outcomes; however, these findings are exploratory and require investigation.

scholarly journals Long stent graft for frozen elephant trunk repair in acute type A aortic dissection

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chaojie Wang ◽  
Wenqian Zhang ◽  
Jihai Peng ◽  
Jie He ◽  
Wenliu Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Dissection ◽  
Thoracic Aorta ◽  
False Lumen ◽  
Type A ◽  
Acute Type ◽  
Frozen Elephant Trunk ◽  
Elephant Trunk ◽  
Type A Aortic Dissection ◽  
Aortic Remodeling

OBJECTIVES: The frozen elephant trunk (FET) technique has become an important tool in the treatment of acute type A aortic dissection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of long FET on spinal cord injury (SCI) and distal aortic remodeling after acute type A aortic dissection based on clinical and radiological outcomes. METHODS: From January 2018 to November 2019, 158 patients [mean age 51.8 years (range 32 - 78 years), 88.6% male] with acute type A aortic dissection were treated by FET with 100 mm (n=113) or 150 mm (n=45) open hybrid stent graft prosthesis. Patients were divided into two groups according to the length of FET. The clinical and radiological outcomes of the patients were reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: Postoperative outcomes did not differ significantly: in-hospital mortality (9.7% vs 6.7%, P=0.758) and SCI (5.3% vs 2.2%, P=0.674). Aortic remodeling, which was evaluated by aortic diameter, true lumen diameter, false lumen diameter and the rate of false lumen complete thrombosis, was more positive in long FET group in the descending thoracic aorta during the follow-up period. At the abdominal level, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The long version of FET does not increase the risk of SCI in patients with acute type A aortic dissection. The application of long FET can achieve better results in terms of remodeling of the thoracic aorta in the short- and medium-term follow-up.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document