scholarly journals Surgical aortic valve replacement and patient–prosthesis mismatch: a meta-analysis of 108 182 patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michel Pompeu Barros de Oliveira Sá ◽  
Martinha Millianny Barros de Carvalho ◽  
Dário Celestino Sobral Filho ◽  
Luiz Rafael Pereira Cavalcanti ◽  
Sérgio da Costa Rayol ◽  
...  

Abstract OBJECTIVES This study sought to evaluate the impact of patient–prosthesis mismatch (PPM) on the risk of perioperative, early-, mid- and long-term mortality rates after surgical aortic valve replacement. METHODS Databases were searched for studies published until March 2018. The main outcomes of interest were perioperative mortality, 1-year mortality, 5-year mortality and 10-year mortality. RESULTS The search yielded 3761 studies for inclusion. Of these, 70 articles were analysed, and their data were extracted. The total number of patients included was 108 182 who underwent surgical aortic valve replacement. The incidence of PPM after surgical aortic valve replacement was 53.7% (58 116 with PPM and 50 066 without PPM). Perioperative mortality [odds ratio (OR) 1.491, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.302–1.707; P < 0.001], 1-year mortality (OR 1.465, 95% CI 1.277–1.681; P < 0.001), 5-year mortality (OR 1.358, 95% CI 1.218–1.515; P < 0.001) and 10-year mortality (OR 1.534, 95% CI 1.290–1.825; P < 0.001) were increased in patients with PPM. Both severe PPM and moderate PPM were associated with increased risk of perioperative mortality, 1-year mortality, 5-year mortality and 10-year mortality when analysed together and separately, although we observed a higher risk in the group with severe PPM. CONCLUSIONS Moderate/severe PPM increases perioperative, early-, mid- and long-term mortality rates proportionally to its severity. The findings of this study support the implementation of surgical strategies to prevent PPM in order to decrease mortality rates.

Author(s):  
Mohamed Farag ◽  
Yusuf Kiberu ◽  
Ashwin Reddy ◽  
Ahmad Shoaib ◽  
Mohaned Egred ◽  
...  

Introduction Atrial fibrillation (AF) is frequent after any cardiac surgery, but evidence suggests it may have no significant impact on survival if sinus rhythm (SR) is effectively restored early after the onset of the arrhythmia. In contrast, management of preoperative AF is often overlooked during or after cardiac surgery despite several proposed protocols. This study sought to evaluate the impact of preoperative AF on mortality in patients undergoing isolated surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR). Methods We performed a retrospective, single-centre study involving 2,628 consecutive patients undergoing elective, primary isolated surgical AVR from 2008 to 2018. A total of 268/ 2,628 patients (10.1%) exhibited AF before surgery. The effect of preoperative AF on mortality was evaluated with univariate and multivariate analyses. Results Short-term mortality was 0.8% and was not different between preoperative AF and SR cohorts. Preoperative AF was highly predictive of long-term mortality (median follow-up of 4 years [Q1-Q3 2-7]; HR: 2.24, 95% CI: 1.79-2.79, P<0.001), and remained strongly and independently predictive after adjustment for other risk factors (HR: 1.54, 95% CI: 1.21-1.96, P<0.001) compared with preoperative SR. In propensity score-matched analysis, the adjusted mortality risk was higher in the AF cohort (OR: 1.47, 95% CI: 1.04-1.99, P=0.03) compared with the SR cohort. Conclusions Preoperative AF was independently predictive of long-term mortality in patients undergoing isolated surgical AVR. It remains to be seen whether concomitant surgery or other preoperative measures to correct AF may impact long-term survival.


2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (10) ◽  
pp. S236
Author(s):  
A. Poulin ◽  
M. Berthelot-Richer ◽  
L. Tastet ◽  
L. Simard ◽  
D. Kalavrouziotis ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 104 (4) ◽  
pp. 1259-1264 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin L. Greason ◽  
Brian D. Lahr ◽  
John M. Stulak ◽  
Yong-Mei Cha ◽  
Robert F. Rea ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 68 (02) ◽  
pp. 124-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grischa Hoffmann ◽  
Selam Abraham-Westphal ◽  
Tim Attmann ◽  
Derk Frank ◽  
Georg Lutter ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The impact of patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) after aortic valve replacement (AVR) on long-term survival and quality of life (QoL) remains controversial. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of PPM on long-term survival and QoL in a large cohort of patients treated with isolated stented biological AVR in a single-center experience. Methods We analyzed data of 632 consecutive patients following isolated stented biological AVR between 2007 and 2012 at our institution. We evaluated the QoL (393 evaluable patients) using the Short Form 12-item Health Survey (SF-12) questionnaire via telephone call and the impact of PPM on long-term survival (533 evaluable patients) by Kaplan–Meier's estimate. Results Severe PPM (<0.65 cm2/m2) had a negative impact on physical component summary (PCS) score (SF-12) compared with patients with moderate or no PPM (p = 0.014), while the mental component summary (MCS) score (SF-12) was not affected by the degree of PPM (p = 0.133). Long-term survival was not different among the three different PPM groups investigated (p = 0.75). Conclusion Severity of PPM demonstrated no influence on long-term survival and MCS score (SF-12), but it was associated with a lower PCS score (SF-12) in patients with severe PPM.


2013 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 647-653 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Carlos Bianco ◽  
Baqir Qizilbash ◽  
Michel Carrier ◽  
Pierre Couture ◽  
Annik Fortier ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document