scholarly journals Restrictive vs liberal blood transfusion strategy in patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease: meta-analysis from randomized controlled trials

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Maraey ◽  
A Elzanaty ◽  
H Elsharnoby ◽  
M Younes ◽  
M Salem ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Blood Transfusion ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Liberal Group ◽  
Symptomatic Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Artery Disease

Abstract Background Anemia is common in patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease. Observational studies investigated blood transfusion threshold in symptomatic coronary artery disease but results were conflicting. Meta-analyses evaluating transfusion threshold utilized data mainly from observational trials but no meta-analysis, to our knowledge, used data solely from randomized clinical trials. Objective The goal of our study is to evaluate efficacy and safety outcomes in anemic patients presenting with symptomatic coronary artery disease using pooled data from randomized clinical trials. Methods We queried Medline, Embase and Cochrane data bases for randomized clinical trials comparing restrictive blood transfusion (defined as transfusion when hemoglobin is less than 8 gm/dl) vs liberal blood transfusion (transfusion when hemoglobin is less than 10 gm/dl) in patients presenting with symptomatic artery disease or acute coronary syndrome. We identified 3 randomized controlled trials; MINT, CRIT and REALITY trials. Data were pooled from 3 trials. Efficacy outcomes evaluated were all-cause mortality and New or recurrent myocardial infarction. Safety outcomes were congestive heart failure at 30-day follow up. Results A total of 820 patients were included in our meta-analysis; 420 patients in restrictive blood transfusion protocol and 400 in liberal blood transfusion protocol There was no difference between two groups at 30-day follow up in all identified outcomes (all-cause mortality, new or recurrent myocardial infarction, and Congestive heart failure). 55 patients died (22/420 in restrictive group and 33/400 in liberal group). Risk ratio of all-cause mortality in restrictive group was 0.63 [95% CI (0.38–1.07), P=0.09, I2=30%]. 15/420 in restrictive group and 16/400 in liberal group had new or recurrent myocardial infarction. Risk ratio of myocardial infarction in restrictive group was 0.91 [95% CI (0.46–1.80), P=0.78, I2=0%]. 20/420 patients in restrictive group and 24/400 in liberal group had congestive heart failure with risk ratio of 0.80 [95% CI (0.19–3.37), P=0.30, I2=76%] in restrictive group. Conclusion Our meta-analysis showed similar outcomes between restrictive and liberal transfusion policies in patients presenting with symptomatic coronary artery disease of acute myocardial infarction. Our findings are consistent with available data about restricting transfusion in general population. Restricting blood transfusion might be cost-effective. Further studies are warranted to evaluate long term safety and efficacy of such approach. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

Mortality after bleeding versus myocardial infarction in coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (7) ◽  
pp. 550-560
Author(s):  
Raffaele Piccolo ◽  
Angelo Oliva ◽  
Marisa Avvedimento ◽  
Anna Franzone ◽  
Stephan Windecker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Artery Disease

Abstract 15071: Effect of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on Death and Myocardial Infarction in Patients Withstable Coronary Artery Disease and Inducible Ischemia

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Qais Radaideh ◽  
Mohammed Osman ◽  
Babikir Kheiri ◽  
Ahmad Al-Abdouh ◽  
mahmoud Barbarawi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Stress Testing ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Artery Disease ◽  
Severe Ischemia

Introduction: There has been a continuous debate about the survival benefit of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for the management of patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) and moderate to severe ischemia. To address this, we performed a meta-analysis of RCTs comparing PCI plus MT vs. MT alone in stable CAD patients to evaluate endpoints of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular (CV) mortality, and MI in a larger cohort of patients with objective evidence of myocardial ischemia. Methods: An electronic database search was conducted for RCTs that compared PCI on top of MT versus MT alone. A random effects model was used to calculate relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: A total of 7 RCTs with 10,043 patients with a mean age of 62.54 ± 1.56 years and a median follow up of 3.9 years were identified. Among patients with (CAD) and moderate to severe ischemia by stress testing, PCI didn’t show any benefit for the primary outcome of all-cause mortality compared to MT(RR = 0.85; 95% CI 0.646-1.12; p= 0.639). There was also no benefit in cardiovascular (CV) death (RR = 0.88 ; 95% CI 0.71-1.09; p =0.18) or myocardial infarction (MI) (RR = 0.271 ; 95% CI 0.782-1.087; P =0.327) in the PCI group as compared to MT. Conclusions: Among patients with (CAD) and evidence of moderate to severe ischemia by stress testing, PCI on top of MT appears to add no mortality benefit as compared to with MT alone.

scholarly journals Effects of Preoperative HbA1c Levels on the Postoperative Outcomes of Coronary Artery Disease Surgical Treatment in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus and Nondiabetic Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Jinjing Wang ◽  
Xufei Luo ◽  
Xinye Jin ◽  
Meng Lv ◽  
Xueqiong Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Renal Failure ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Postoperative Outcomes ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Artery Disease ◽  
Hba1c Levels

Aims. To investigate the effect of preoperative HbA1c levels on the postoperative outcomes of coronary artery disease surgery in diabetic and nondiabetic patients. Methods and Results. The MEDLINE (via PubMed), Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, Wanfang Data, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Chinese Biology Medicine (CBM) databases were used to search the effects of different preoperative HbA1c levels on the postoperative outcomes of coronary artery disease surgical treatment in diabetic and nondiabetic patients from inception to December 2018. Two review authors worked in an independent and duplicate manner to select eligible studies, extract data, and assess the risk of bias of the included studies. We used a meta-analysis to synthesize data and analyze subgroups, sensitivity, and publication bias as well as the GRADE methodology if appropriate. The literature search retrieved 886 records initially, and 23 cohort studies were included in the meta-analysis. In this meta-analysis, we found that there was a reduced incidence of surgical site infections (OR=2.94, 95% CI 2.18-3.98), renal failure events (OR=1.63, 95% CI 1.13-2.33), and myocardial infarction events (OR=1.69, 95% CI 1.16-2.47), as well as a shortened hospital stay (MD=1.08, 95% CI 0.46-1.71), in diabetic patients after coronary artery disease surgical treatment with lower preoperative HbA1c levels. For nondiabetic patients, a higher preoperative HbA1c level resulted in an increase in the incidence of mortality (OR=2.23, 95% CI 1.01-4.90) and renal failure (OR=2.33, 95% CI 1.32-4.12). No significant difference was found between higher and lower preoperative HbA1c levels in the incidence of mortality (OR=1.06, 95% CI 0.88-1.26), stroke (OR=1.49, 95% CI 0.94-2.37), or atrial fibrillation (OR=0.94, 95% CI 0.67-1.33); the length of ICU stay (MD=0.20, 95% CI -0.14-0.55); or sepsis incidence (OR=2.49, 95% CI 0.99-6.25) for diabetic patients or for myocardial infarction events (OR=1.32, 95% CI 0.27-6.31) or atrial fibrillation events (OR=0.99, 95% CI 0.74-1.33) for nondiabetic patients. The certainty of evidence was judged to be moderate or low. Conclusion. This meta-analysis showed that higher preoperative HbA1c levels may potentially increase the risk of surgical site infections, renal failure, and myocardial infarction and reduce the length of hospital stay in diabetic subjects after coronary artery disease surgical treatment and increase the risk of mortality and renal failure in nondiabetic patients. However, there was great inconsistency in defining higher preoperative HbA1c levels in the studies included; we still need high-quality RCTs with a sufficiently large sample size to further investigate this issue in the future. This trial is registered with CRD42019121531.

Factor XIII Val34Leu variant protects against coronary artery disease

2007 ◽  
Vol 97 (03) ◽  
pp. 458-463 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zsuzsanna Bereczky ◽  
Éva Katona ◽  
Róza Ádány ◽  
László Muszbek ◽  
Zoltán Vokó
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Protective Effect ◽  
Factor Xiii ◽  
Empirical Bayes ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Environmental Interactions ◽  
History Of ◽  
Artery Disease

SummarySeveral studies suggested that Val34Leu variant of factor XIII (FXIII) might have a protective effect against coronary artery disease (CAD), but studies not supporting these findings have also been published. The authors performed a meta-analysis of 16 studies on 5,346 cases and 7,053 controls that investigated the association between Val34Leu polymorphism and CAD defined as history of myocardial infarction or significant stenosis on a coronary artery assessed by coronary angiography. Because of the heterogeneity of the study-specific results, the pooled effect estimates were calculated by a random-effects empirical Bayes model. The combined odds ratios for CAD were 0.82 (95% confidence interval [95% Cl] 0.73, 0.94) for the heterozygotes of the FXIIIVal34Leu variant, 0.89 (95% CI 0.69, 1.13) for the homozygotes, and 0.81 (95% CI 0.70, 0.92) for the heterozygotes and homozygotes combined. The results were essentially the same when only myocardial infarction was considered as outcome. The beneficial effect of the polymorphism might be smaller than the effect estimates obtained in this metaanalysis, because the analysis raised the possibility of publication bias. Data published in the literature suggest that gene-gene and gene-environmental interactions might significantly influence the protective effect of FXIII-AVal34Leu polymorphism.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document