P1857Risk calculator for prediction of iatrogenic atrial septal defect persistence following percutaneous mitral valve repair

Abstract Background The rising number of new percutaneous interventions for left-sided heart disease leads to increased occurrence of iatrogenic atrial septal defect (iASD). The percutaneous mitral valve repair (PMVR) for severe, symptomatic mitral regurgitation (MR) also requires intraprocedural puncture of the interatrial septum. In some cases iASD is persisting and becomes haemodynamically relevant with enhanced right heart overload due to significant left-to-right-shunting. Purpose This study aimed to evaluate pre- and periprocedural factors that may favour persistence and haemodynamic relevance of iASD in patients after PMVR. Methods In 2015, 75 consecutive patients with severe MR (age 74.8±10.5y) and following PMVR were enrolled. After 12 months, 57 patients completed their follow up (FU) including clinical conditions, transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) whenever feasible. We evaluated the impact of comorbidities as well as intraprocedural, haemodynamic and functional characteristics that may favour persistence of iASD by multivariate analysis. Haemodynamic relevance of iASD was defined as right heart overload with predominantly significant enlargement of the right atrium (RA), impairment of right heart function as defined by fractional area shortening (FAC), and ratio of pulmonary to systemic blood flow (Qp/Qs>1) when available. Results 18 out of 57 patients (32%) showed a persistent iASD (+iASD), being associated with a specific combination of comorbidities as well as pre-procedural and periprocedural factors that can be summarised by a multifactorial iASD risk calculator (+iASD vs. -iASD: 6.3±2.9 vs. 3.9±2.7; p=0.0058). 11 iASD (61%) became haemodynamically relevant (+hd iASD) with a significant right heart overload (RA area +hd iASD vs. -hd iASD: baseline 23.1±4.1 vs. 23.2±4.3; FU 30.7±6.3 vs. 20.1±4.6; p<0.0001), reduced RV function (FAC +hd iASD vs. -hd iASD: baseline 41.0±10.3 vs. 29.9±7.2; FU 25.3±7.2 vs. 29.1±13.2; p<0.0156) and left-to-right shunting (Qp/Qs -iASD vs. +hd iASD vs. -hd iASD: 1.0±0.3 vs. 1.7±0.4 vs. 0.8±0.1 L/min; p=0.0011). Conclusion This study shows for the first time, that persistence of iASD can be predicted by pre- and periprocedural factors using a risk calculator that may additionally guide careful follow up imaging and therapeutic action after PMVR to avoid development of progressive heart failure.

Download Full-text

Incidence and clinical relevance of persistent iatrogenic atrial septal defect after percutaneous mitral valve repair

Scientific Reports ◽

10.1038/s41598-021-92255-3 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 11 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Mhd Nawar Alachkar ◽

Anas Alnaimi ◽

Sebastain Reith ◽

Ertunc Altiok ◽

Jörg Schröder ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Mitral Valve ◽

Right Ventricular ◽

Atrial Septal Defect ◽

Mitral Valve Repair ◽

Septal Defect ◽

Valve Repair ◽

Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Iatrogenic Atrial Septal Defect

AbstractPercutaneous mitral valve repair (PMVR) requires transseptal puncture and results in iatrogenic atrial septal defect (iASD). The impact of persistent iASD was previously investigated. However, data were diverse and inconclusive. 53 patients who underwent MITRACLIP were retrospectively included. Based on the presence of iASD in transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) after 6 months, patients were divided in two groups (iASD group vs. non-iASD group). Impact of iASD on outcome at 6 months and at two years was evaluated. Persistent iASD was detected in 62% of patients. Independent predictors for persistent iASD were female gender and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. At 6-month follow-up, there was no difference in reduction of NYHA class (ΔNYHA = 1.3 ± 1 in iASD group vs. 0.9 ± 1 in non-iASD group, p = 0.171). There was a significant difference in right ventricular end diastolic diameter (RVEDd) (42 ± 8 mm in iASD-group vs. 39 ± 4 mm in non-iASD group, p = 0.047). However, right ventricular systolic function (TAPSE) (14 ± 7 mm in iASD group vs. 16 ± 8 mm in non-iASD group, p = 0.176) and right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) (40 ± 12 mmHg in iASD group vs. 35 ± 10 mmHg in non-iASD group, p = 0.136) were still comparable between both groups. At 2 years follow-up, there was no significant difference regarding rate of rehospitalization (24% vs 15%, p = 0.425) or mortality (12% vs 10%, p = 0.941) between both groups. Incidence of persistent iASD after MITRACLIP is markedly high. Despite the increase in right ventricular diameter in patients with persistent iASD, these patients were not clinically compromised compared to patients without persistent iASD.

Download Full-text