Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair in Patients with Severe Mitral Regurgitation and Acute Decompensated Heart Failure

The role of percutaneous mitral valve repair (PMVr) in management of high-risk patients with severe mitral regurgitation (MR) and acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) is undetermined. We screened all patients who underwent PMVr between October 2015 and March 2020. We evaluated immediate, 30-day, and 1-year outcomes in patients who underwent PMVr during hospitalization due to ADHF as compared to elective patients. From a cohort of 237 patients, we identified 46 patients (19.4%) with severe MR of either functional or degenerative etiology who underwent PMVr during index hospitalization due to ADHF, including 17 (37%) critically ill patients. Patients’ mean age was 75.2 ± 9.8 years, 56% were males. There were no differences in background history between ADHF and elective patients. Patients with ADHF were at higher risk for surgery, reflected in higher mean EuroSCORE II, compared with elective patients. After PMVr, we observed higher 30-day mortality rate in ADHF patients as compared to the elective group (10.9% vs. 3.1%, respectively, p = 0.042). One-year mortality rate was similar between the groups (21.7% vs. 17.9%, p = 0.493). Clinical and echocardiographic follow-up showed improvement of NYHA functional class and sPAP reduction in both groups ((54 ± 15 mmHg to 50 ±15 in the elective group (p = 0.02), 58 ± 13 mmHg to 52 ± 12 in the ADHF group (p = 0.02)). PMVr could be an alternative option for treatment of patients with severe MR and ADHF.

Transthoracic Guidance Of Percutaneous Tricuspid Valve Repair: a case report

Background Percutaneous tricuspid valve (TV) repair for tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is arising as a viable treatment option in high-risk patients and can lead to symptom control an improvement in quality of life (QoL). Newest devices have greatly increased safety and efficacy of interventional TR therapy. However, as with any emerging medical procedure, safety aspects need to be considered and procedural risks gradually reduced. Case summary We present the case of an 87-year-old woman with massive TR despite successful percutaneous mitral valve repair. The patient was turned down for surgery and eventually underwent percutaneous TV repair using the TriClipTM (Abbott Medical) device. Significant TR reduction with sustained procedural success at thirty-day follow-up were associated with functional and clinical improvement. Transthoracic echocardiographic guidance of the procedure, thanks to excellent parasternal TV visualization, is highlighted, while the complex anatomy of the TV is pointed out. Discussion TR is an individual predictor of morbidity but frequently found in elderly patients who are deemed very high risk for surgical treatment. This case underscores the use of modern interventional techniques and devices for addressing TR and improving QoL, whether as a stand-alone procedure or as part of complete interventional therapy of the atrioventricular valves.

Exercise Hemodynamic Profiling Is Associated With Outcome in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair

Background: Percutaneous mitral valve repair (PMVR) in high-risk patients is currently controversial, especially in those with secondary mitral regurgitation (MR). Exercise pulmonary hemodynamics may help to unmask cardiac dysfunction as well as the dynamic impact of MR. The present study sought to explore the clinical impact of preprocedural exercise right heart catheterization (RHC) for the selection of patients who could most benefit from PMVR. Methods: Sixty-eight patients with symptomatic primary and secondary MR and exercise RHC before PMVR were included in this retrospective analysis of the association of exercise RHC parameters with survival and improvement in New York Heart Association class within 12 months. Results: Median patient age was 77 years (±8.5), 37% were female, and 81% presented with New York Heart Association class III. A total of 65% of the patients had left ventricular ejection fraction <55%. MR was severe in 49% and moderate-to-severe in 51%. Twenty-two patients (32%) died within the follow-up period of 19 months (interquartile range, 9–32); they had a lower rise (Δ) in the V-wave on pulmonary artery wedge pressure tracings. Patients with ΔV-wave ≥17 mm Hg had a reduced risk of death after PMVR (hazard ratio, 0.11 [95% CI, 0.04–0.33], P <0.001), independent of age, frailty index, and workload during RHC. A higher ΔV-wave was also associated with New York Heart Association improvement (odds ratio, 1.14 [95% CI, 1.07–1.24]; P <0.001), and 79% of patients with ∆V-wave ≥15 mm Hg were in New York Heart Association class I or II at follow-up (<15 mm Hg: 28%). These results were for the most part confirmed in the subgroup of patients with secondary MR (65%). Conclusions: In our cohort of patients with indication for PMVR, preprocedural exercise RHC was able to identify patients with an unfavorable outcome. Further studies with larger patient numbers are warranted before this approach can be implemented in a structured diagnostic workup of patients under evaluation for PMVR.