scholarly journals 727 Circadian variations of platelet reactivity on Clopidogrel in patients treated with elective percutaneous coronary intervention

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_G) ◽  
Author(s):  
Simone Circhetta ◽  
Fabio Mangiacapra ◽  
Michele Mattia Viscusi ◽  
Luca Paolucci ◽  
Roberta De Luca ◽  
...  

Abstract Aims The potential diurnal variations of platelet reactivity in patients on clopidogrel treated with elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for stable coronary artery disease (CAD) are currently unknown. Methods and results We prospectively enrolled 15 patients with stable CAD treated PCI and on clopidogrel therapy for at least eight days. All patients received their maintenance 75-mg clopidogrel dose at 8 AM. Platelet reactivity was assessed with the Verifynow P2Y12 assay at three different time points (10 AM, 6 PM, and 6 AM). Platelet reactivity is expressed as P2Y12 reaction units (PRU) and PRU thresholds ≥208 and ≥240 were used to define high platelet reactivity (HPR). A significant heterogeneity in diurnal levels of platelet reactivity was found (P = 0.0004), with a peak occurring at the 6 AM assessment. In addition, at the 6 AM evaluation patients showed the highest prevalence of HPR (53.3% of patients with PRU ≥240, 66.7% of patients with PRU ≥208). Conclusions Platelet reactivity in patients with stable CAD treated with PCI and taking clopidogrel in the morning follows a circadian rhythm, thus suggesting that platelet inhibition may not be constant and sufficient throughout the day. Whether an evening or a bis in die administration of clopidogrel may result in a constant and more reliable antiplatelet inhibition, should be investigated in dedicated studies.

2021 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. E887-E892
Author(s):  
Zeyi Cheng ◽  
Miaomiao Qi ◽  
Zekun Lang ◽  
Tingting Fang ◽  
Mahboob Alam ◽  
...  

Objective: The purpose of this investigation aimed to clarify the impact of peripheral artery disease (PAD) on the prognosis value of patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods: The SPSS 16 software was used for secondary analysis of DRYAD database data. A total of 204 patients were enrolled from Shinonoi General Hospital for newly diagnosed stable CAD and received PCI performance between October 2014 and October 2017. Patients with old myocardial infarction (MI) were excluded. We divided patients into two groups with PAD and without PAD. The primary endpoints were major adverse cardiac events (MACE, defined as all-cause death, non-fatal MI, and non-fatal stroke) and cardiovascular events (defined as cardiovascular death, non-fatal MI, and non-fatal stroke). The secondary outcomes were the individual components of the composite primary outcomes. The median follow-up time was 783 days. Results: No statistical difference was found between PAD and non-PAD patients of lesional characteristics. Spearman’s rank correlations indicate diabetes mellitus (DM) (P = 0.019) and HbA1c (P = 0.009) are positively correlated with PAD. In Kaplan-Meier analysis, patients with PAD predicted poor prognosis in MACE (P < 0.05) and cardiovascular events (P < 0.05). In Multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis, patients with PAD independently predicted MACE and cardiovascular events. Conclusions: PAD is a significant mediator for the prognosis of patients with stable CAD who underwent PCI treatment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document