scholarly journals Long-term single-centre large volume experience with transseptal endocardial left ventricular lead implantation

EP Europace ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (8) ◽  
pp. 1237-1245 ◽  
Author(s):  
László Gellér ◽  
Zoltán Salló ◽  
Levente Molnár ◽  
Tamás Tahin ◽  
Emin Evren Özcan ◽  
...  

Abstract Aims The aim of our study was to investigate the long-term efficacy and safety of transseptal endocardial left ventricular lead implantation (TELVLI). Methods and results Transseptal endocardial left ventricular lead implantation was performed in 54 patients (44 men, median age 69, New York Heart Association III–IV stage) between 2007 and 2017 in a single centre. In 36 cases, the transseptal puncture (TP) was performed via the femoral vein, and in 18 cases, the TP and also the left ventricular (LV) lead placement were performed via the subclavian vein. An electrophysiological deflectable catheter was used to reach the LV wall through the dilated TP hole. The LV lead implantation was successful in all patients. A total of 54 patients were followed up for a median of 29 months [interquartile range (IQR) 8–40 months], the maximum follow-up time was 94 months. Significant improvement in the LV ejection fraction was observed at the 3-month visit, from the median of 27% (IQR 25–34%) to 33% (IQR 32–44%), P < 0.05. Early lead dislocation was observed in three cases (5%), reposition was performed using the original puncture site in all. The patients were maintained on anticoagulation therapy with a target international normalized ratio between 2.5 and 3.5. Four thromboembolic events were noticed during follow-up. A total of 27 patients died, with a median survival of 15 months (IQR 6–40). Conclusion The TELVLI is an effective approach for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) however it is associated with a substantial thromboembolic risk (7%).

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (11) ◽  
pp. 1410-1420 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valentina Kutyifa ◽  
Annamaria Kosztin ◽  
Helmut U. Klein ◽  
Yitschak Biton ◽  
Vivien Klaudia Nagy ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 121-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Neuhoff ◽  
S. Szilágyi ◽  
L. Molnár ◽  
I. Osztheimer ◽  
E. Zima ◽  
...  

AbstractIntroduction. In patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), failure rate to implant the left ventricular (LV) lead by the traditional trans-venous approach is 4-8%. Surgical epicardial implantation is considered as an alternative, but this technique is not without morbidity. Evidence from case documentation and from small trial batches demonstrated the viability of endocardial LV lead implantation where surgical epicardial lead placement is not applicable.Material and Methods. Four patients were implanted with endocardial LV lead using the transseptal atrial approach after unsuccessful transvenous implantation. Implantation of an endocardial active fixation LV leads was successful in all patients with stable electrical parameters immediately after implantation and over the follow-up period. All patients received anticoagulation therapy in order to target the international normalized ratio of 2.5-3.5 and have not experienced any thromboembolic, hemorrhagic events, or infection.Results. Follow-up echocardiography indicated significant improvement of LV systolic function (24 + 4.9 to 32 + 5.1 %, P = 0.023) with a notable improvement of the functional status.Conclusions. Endocardial left ventricular lead implantation can be a valuable and safe alternative technique to enable LV stimulation in high surgical risk patients where standard coronary sinus implant is unsuccessful.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document