scholarly journals Longitudinal Analysis of Calorie Restriction on Rat Taste Bud Morphology and Expression of Sweet Taste Modulators

2013 ◽  
Vol 69 (5) ◽  
pp. 532-544 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Cai ◽  
C. M. Daimon ◽  
W.-n. Cong ◽  
R. Wang ◽  
P. Chirdon ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena von Molitor ◽  
Katja Riedel ◽  
Michael Krohn ◽  
Mathias Hafner ◽  
Rüdiger Rudolf ◽  
...  

Sweetness is the preferred taste of humans and many animals, likely because sugars are a primary source of energy. In many mammals, sweet compounds are sensed in the tongue by the gustatory organ, the taste buds. Here, a group of taste bud cells expresses a canonical sweet taste receptor, whose activation induces Ca2+ rise, cell depolarization and ATP release to communicate with afferent gustatory nerves. The discovery of the sweet taste receptor, 20 years ago, was a milestone in the understanding of sweet signal transduction and is described here from a historical perspective. Our review briefly summarizes the major findings of the canonical sweet taste pathway, and then focuses on molecular details, about the related downstream signaling, that are still elusive or have been neglected. In this context, we discuss evidence supporting the existence of an alternative pathway, independent of the sweet taste receptor, to sense sugars and its proposed role in glucose homeostasis. Further, given that sweet taste receptor expression has been reported in many other organs, the physiological role of these extraoral receptors is addressed. Finally, and along these lines, we expand on the multiple direct and indirect effects of sugars on the brain. In summary, the review tries to stimulate a comprehensive understanding of how sweet compounds signal to the brain upon taste bud cells activation, and how this gustatory process is integrated with gastro-intestinal sugar sensing to create a hedonic and metabolic representation of sugars, which finally drives our behavior. Understanding of this is indeed a crucial step in developing new strategies to prevent obesity and associated diseases.


2000 ◽  
Vol 279 (1) ◽  
pp. C120-C125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valery Krizhanovsky ◽  
Orly Agamy ◽  
Michael Naim

Initial sweet taste transduction is expected to occur in the subsecond time range. We demonstrate a rapid and transient (75–250 ms) increase of cGMP (but not cAMP) level in rat intact circumvallate taste cells after stimulation by sucrose. This rapid increase does not occur in nonsensory epithelial cells. Pretreatment with a nonspecific phosphodiesterase (PDE) inhibitor (IBMX), a specific cAMP-PDE4 inhibitor (denbufylline), or an adenylyl cyclase activator (forskolin) all increased basal cAMP and abolished the sucrose-stimulated cGMP increase at 150 ms. Pretreatment with a soluble guanylyl cyclase inhibitor (1H-[1,2,4]oxadiazolo[4,3-a]quinoxalin-1-one) reduced, whereas a specific cGMP-PDE inhibitor (zaprinast) abolished, the sucrose-stimulated cGMP increase. It is proposed that cGMP is involved in the initial stage of sugar taste transduction and that cGMP is more significant than cAMP at this stage. Activation of soluble guanylyl cyclase and inhibition of cGMP-PDE may be involved in the transient elevation of cGMP in response to sucrose stimulation. Moreover, it appears that cAMP level must remain low for sucrose to stimulate an increase in cGMP.


2012 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 322-330 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Dando ◽  
G. Dvoryanchikov ◽  
E. Pereira ◽  
N. Chaudhari ◽  
S. D. Roper
Keyword(s):  

1981 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 265-273 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. J. Gentle ◽  
W. A. Dewar ◽  
P. A. L. Wight

1993 ◽  
Vol 70 (6) ◽  
pp. 2326-2336 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. A. Cummings ◽  
J. Powell ◽  
S. C. Kinnamon

1. Physiological and behavioral responses to artificial sweeteners, natural sweeteners, and cyclic nucleotides were assessed using two techniques. An extracellular “in situ” technique recorded action potentials from fungiform taste buds and the two-bottle preference test measured behavioral preferences for the different sweeteners. 2. Two high-potency sweeteners, NC-00274-01 (NC01) and NC-00044-AA (NCAA), were preferred over water at micromolar concentrations. Saccharin and sucrose were likewise preferred, but at millimolar concentrations. 3. Bursts of action currents were elicited by sucrose at 200 mM, saccharin at 20 mM, and NCAA at 0.1 mM. A concentration-response curve for the high-potency sweetener NC01 revealed a threshold concentration of 1 microM and a saturation concentration of 100 microM. No responses were elicited by aspartame. 4. The responses to different sweeteners adapted rapidly at saturating concentrations. With NC01, adaptation was concentration dependent: at threshold the response adapted very slowly if at all. Adaptation increased with increasing concentration. 5. Membrane-permeant analogues of adenosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate and guanosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate mimicked sweeteners in their ability to elicit a response. This occurred with high fidelity: nearly every taste bud that responded to sweeteners also responded to the nucleotides and every sweet-unresponsive taste bud was nucleotide unresponsive. 6. The sweet responses and nucleotide responses occurred in the absence of permeant apical cations and were not enhanced nor diminished by the presence of such cations. Amiloride had no effect on the sweet response.


2011 ◽  
Vol 67A (4) ◽  
pp. 336-344 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu-Kyong Shin ◽  
Wei-na Cong ◽  
Huan Cai ◽  
Wook Kim ◽  
Stuart Maudsley ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document