Perceived Effectiveness of Home-Based Primary Care Teams in Veterans Health Administration

2019 ◽  
Vol 60 (3) ◽  
pp. 494-502 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helena Temkin-Greener ◽  
Jill Szydlowski ◽  
Orna Intrator ◽  
Tobie Olsan ◽  
Jurgis Karuza ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and Objectives Previous studies have shown that staff perception of team effectiveness is related to better health outcomes in various care settings. This study focused on the Veterans Health Administration’s Home-Based Primary Care (HBPC) program. We examined variations in HBPC interdisciplinary teamwork (IDT) and identified modifiable team and program characteristics that may influence staff perceptions of team effectiveness. Research Design We used a broadly validated survey instrument to measure perceived team effectiveness, workplace conditions/resources, group culture, and respondents’ characteristics. Surveys were initiated in January and completed in July, 2016. Methods Team membership rosters (n = 249) included 2,852 IDT members. The final analytical data set included 1,403 surveys (49%) from 221 (89%) teams. A generalized estimating equation model with logit link function, weighted by survey response rates, was used to examine factors associated with perceived team effectiveness. Results Respondents who served as primary care providers (PCPs) were 8% more likely (p = .0044) to view team’s performance as highly effective compared to other team members. Teams with nurse practitioners serving as team leader reported 6% higher likelihood of high-perceived team effectiveness (p = .0234). High team effectiveness was 13% more likely in sites where the predominant culture was characterized as group/developmental, and 7%–8% more likely in sites with lower environmental stress and better resources and staffing, respectively. Conclusions and Implications Team effectiveness is an important indirect measure of HBPC teams’ function. HBPC teams should examine their predominant culture, workplace stress, resources and staffing, and PCP leadership model as part of their quality improvement efforts.

Author(s):  
Ksenia Gorbenko ◽  
Emily Franzosa ◽  
Sybil Masse ◽  
Abraham A Brody ◽  
Orla Sheehan ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Laura Militello ◽  
Julie Diiulio ◽  
Alissa Russ ◽  
April Savoy ◽  
Mindy Flanagan ◽  
...  

This poster describes a project to improve understanding of the challenges associated with managing consultations in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). We conducted interviews and observations with primary care providers and specialists at two VHA facilities. Using qualitative analysis, we identified cognitive requirements, challenges associated with each, and design seeds. During the poster session, we will present design concepts exploring interventions to support management of consultations.


Geriatrics ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine O’Brien ◽  
Sara Bradley ◽  
Vanessa Ramirez-Zohfeld ◽  
Lee Lindquist

The numbers of homebound patients in the United States are increasing. Home-based primary care (HBPC) is an effective model of interdisciplinary care that has been shown to have high patient satisfaction rates and excellent clinical outcomes. However, there are few clinicians that practice HBPC and clinicians that do face additional stressors. This study sought to better understand the stressors that HBPC providers face in caring for homebound patients. This was a cross-sectional qualitative survey and analysis of HBPC providers. Responses were categorized into four themes: The patient in the home setting, caregiver support, logistics, and administrative concerns. This research is the first to analyze the stressors that providers of HBPC face in serving the needs of complex homebound patients. Awareness and attention to these issues will be important for the future sustainability of home-based primary care.


2018 ◽  
Vol 50 (6) ◽  
pp. 455-459 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bonnie M. Vest ◽  
Jessica Kulak ◽  
Victoria M. Hall ◽  
Gregory G. Homish

Background and Objectives: The military population is frequently overlooked in civilian primary care due to an assumption that they are treated at the Veterans Health Administration (VA). However, less than 50% of eligible veterans receive VA treatment. Primary care providers (PCPs) may need support in addressing veterans’ needs. This regional pilot study explored the current state of practice among primary care providers as it pertains to assessing patients’ veteran status and their knowledge of and comfort with treating common conditions in this population. Methods: An electronic survey was administered to PCPs (N=102) in Western New York. Survey questions asked about assessing military status, understanding of military-related health problems, and thoughts on the priority of addressing these issues in practice. Data were analyzed using descriptive summary statistics. Results: The majority (56%; n=54) of respondents indicated they never or rarely ask their patients about military service, and only 19% (n=18) said they often or always ask. Seventy-one percent (n=68) of providers agreed or strongly agreed it was important to know if their patient was a veteran. Participants indicated limited knowledge about military stressors, resources available for military populations, and common medical conditions impacting veterans. Conclusions: Our pilot results demonstrate that in a regional sample of primary care providers, providers rarely ask patients about their military history; however, they feel it is important information for patient care. While further study is needed, it may be necessary to provide education, specifically pertaining to military culture and health-related sequelae, to address barriers that may be limiting PCPs’ provision of care for this population.


2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. B27-B28
Author(s):  
Suzanne Gillespie ◽  
H. Temkin-Greener ◽  
J. Szydlowski ◽  
O. Intrator ◽  
T. Olsan ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 537-537
Author(s):  
Emily Franzosa ◽  
Abraham Brody ◽  
Bruce Leff ◽  
Christine Ritchie ◽  
Bruce Kinosian ◽  
...  

Abstract The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the adoption of virtual care. In this qualitative study, we sought to determine provider perceptions of video telehealth during the first wave of COVID-19 in NYC to inform practice for home-based primary care providers nationwide. We conducted semi-structured interviews with clinical directors, program managers, nurse practitioners, nurse managers, and social workers at 6 NYC practices (N=13) in spring 2020. We used combined open and focused coding to identify themes. Participants employed both hospital-supported and commercial technological platforms to maintain care during COVID-19. Benefits of video telehealth included improved efficiency, capacity and collaboration between providers. Barriers included patients’ physical, cognitive or technological abilities, dependence on caregivers and aides to facilitate video visits, challenges establishing trust with new patients and addressing sensitive topics over video, and concerns over missing important patient information. Considering patient, clinical, and technological conditions can help optimize telehealth implementation among older homebound adults.


2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 337-343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria L. Claver ◽  
Tamar Wyte-Lake ◽  
Aram Dobalian

AbstractIntroductionVeterans served by Veterans Health Administration (VHA) home-based primary care (HBPC) are an especially vulnerable population due to high rates of physical, functional, and psychological limitations. Home-bound patients tend to be an older population dealing with normal changes that accompany old age, but may not adequately be prepared for the increased risk that often occurs during disasters. Home health programs are in an advantageous position to address patient preparedness as they may be one of the few outside resources that reach community-dwelling adults.ProblemThis study further explores issues previously identified from an exploratory study of a single VHA HBPC program regarding disaster preparedness for HBPC patients, including ways in which policy and procedures support the routine assessment of disaster preparedness for patients, including patient education activities.MethodsThis project involved semi-structured interviews with 31 practitioners and leadership at five VHA HBPC programs; three urban and two rural. Transcripts of the interviews were analyzed using content analysis techniques.ResultsPractitioners reported a need for further training regarding how to assess properly patient disaster preparedness and patient willingness to prepare. Four themes emerged, validating themes identified in a prior exploratory project and identifying additional issues regarding patient disaster preparedness: (1) individual HBPC programs generally are tasked with developing their disaster preparedness policies; (2) practitioners receive limited training about HBPC program preparedness; (3) practitioners receive limited training about how to prepare their patients for a disaster; and (4) the role of HBPC programs is focused on fostering patient self-sufficiency rather than presenting practitioners as first responders. There was significant variability across the five sites in terms of which staff have responsibility for preparedness policies and training.ConclusionVariability across and within sites regarding how patient needs are addressed by preparedness policies, and in terms of preparedness training for HBPC providers, could place patients at heightened risk of morbidity or mortality following a disaster. Despite the diversity and uniqueness of HBPC programs and the communities they serve, there are basic aspects of preparedness that should be addressed by these programs. The incorporation of resources in assessment and preparedness activities, accompanied by increased communication among directors of HBPC programs across the country, may improve HBPC programs’ abilities to assist their patients and their caregivers in preparing for a disaster.ClaverML, Wyte-LakeT, DobalianA. Disaster preparedness in home-based primary care: policy and training. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2015;30(4):17.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document