Implementation outcomes of policy and programme innovations to prevent obstetric haemorrhage in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nessa Ryan ◽  
Dorice Vieira ◽  
Dena Goffman ◽  
Evan M Bloch ◽  
Godwin O Akaba ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Implementation Strategies ◽  
Skills Training ◽  
Practical Implementation ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Implementation Outcomes ◽  
Obstetric Haemorrhage ◽  
Prevention Programmes ◽  
Low And Middle Income

Abstract Globally, obstetric haemorrhage (OH) remains the leading cause of maternal mortality. Much of the associated mortality is ascribed to challenges surrounding deployment of innovations rather than lack of availability. In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where the burden is highest, there is a growing interest in implementation research as a means to bridge the ‘know–do’ gap between proven interventions and their reliable implementation at scale. In this systematic review, we identified and synthesized qualitative and quantitative data across the implementation outcomes of OH prevention innovations in LMICs using a taxonomy developed by Proctor et al. We also identified service outcomes for the included innovations, as well as implementation strategies and implementation facilitators and barriers. Eligible studies were empirical, focused on the implementation of OH prevention programmes or policies and occurred in an LMIC. Eight databases were searched. Two authors independently assessed studies for selection and extracted data; the first author resolved discrepancies. Narrative synthesis was used to analyse and interpret the findings. Studies were predominantly focused in Africa and on primary prevention. Interventions included prophylactic use of uterotonics (n = 7), clinical provider skills training (n = 4) and provision of clinical guidelines (n = 1); some (n = 3) were also part of a multi-component quality improvement bundle. Various barriers were reported, including challenges among intervention beneficiaries, providers and within the health system; however, studies reported the development and testing of practical implementation solutions. These included training and monitoring of implementers, community and stakeholder engagement and guidance by external mentors. Some studies linked successful delivery to implementation outcomes, most commonly adoption and acceptability, but also feasibility, penetration and sustainability. Findings suggest that innovations to prevent OH can be acceptable, appropriate and feasible in LMIC settings; however, more research is needed to better evaluate these and other under-reported implementation outcomes.

scholarly journals A systematic review of employment outcomes from youth skills training programmes in agriculture in low- and middle-income countries

Nature Food ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (10) ◽  
pp. 605-619 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. H. Eugenie Maïga ◽  
Mohamed Porgo ◽  
Pam Zahonogo ◽  
Cocou Jaurès Amegnaglo ◽  
Doubahan Adeline Coulibaly ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Grey Literature ◽  
Skills Training ◽  
Urban Migration ◽  
Youth Engagement ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Positive Effects ◽  
Training Programmes ◽  
Low And Middle Income

Abstract Engagement of youth in agriculture in low- and middle-income countries may offer opportunities to curb underemployment, urban migration, disillusionment of youth and social unrest, as well as to lift individuals and communities from poverty and hunger. Lack of education or skills training has been cited as a challenge to engage youth in the sector. Here we systematically interrogate the literature for the evaluation of skills training programmes for youth in low- and middle-income countries. Sixteen studies—nine quantitative, four qualitative and three mixed methods—from the research and grey literature documented the effects of programmes on outcomes relating to youth engagement, including job creation, income, productivity and entrepreneurship in agriculture. Although we find that skills training programmes report positive effects on our chosen outcomes, like previous systematic reviews we find the topic to chronically lack evaluation. Given the interest that donors and policymakers have in youth engagement in agriculture, our systematic review uncovers a gap in the knowledge of their effectiveness.

scholarly journals Publisher Correction: A systematic review of employment outcomes from youth skills training programmes in agriculture in low- and middle-income countries

Nature Food ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (11) ◽  
pp. 755-755
Author(s):  
W. H. Eugenie Maïga ◽  
Mohamed Porgo ◽  
Pam Zahonogo ◽  
Cocou Jaurès Amegnaglo ◽  
Doubahan Adeline Coulibaly ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Skills Training ◽  
Employment Outcomes ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Training Programmes ◽  
Low And Middle Income

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.

scholarly journals Mobile health interventions for HIV/STI prevention among youth in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs): a systematic review of studies reporting implementation outcomes

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ucheoma Nwaozuru ◽  
Chisom Obiezu-Umeh ◽  
Thembekile Shato ◽  
Florida Uzoaru ◽  
Stacey Mason ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Young People ◽  
Implementation Science ◽  
Mobile Health ◽  
Science Literature ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Sti Prevention ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Implementation Outcomes ◽  
Low And Middle Income

Abstract Background Advances and proliferation of technologies such as mobile phones may provide opportunities to improve access to HIV/STI services and reach young people with high risk for HIV and STI. However, the reach, uptake, and sustainability of mobile health (mHealth) HIV/STI interventions targeting young people aged 10–24 years in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are largely unknown. To address this gap and to inform implementation science research, a review was conducted to summarize what is known, and what we need to know about implementing mhealth interventions for HIV/STI prevention targeting young people in LMICs. Methods We used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for this review. Drawing upon Proctor’s eight implementation outcome measures, we evaluated the acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, cost, feasibility, fidelity, penetration, and sustainability of  m-health HIV/STI interventions targeting young people in LMICs. The search was performed from September 2020–January 2021 and updated on March 1, 2021, in Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), PubMed, SCOPUS, Global Health, and Web of Science. Eligible studies were required to include an HIV/STI prevention outcome, target young people aged 10–24 years, include a comparison/control group, and reporting of atleast one implementation outcome as outlined by Proctor. Results A total of 1386 articles were located, and their titles and abstracts were screened. Of these, 57 full-text articles were reviewed and subsequently, and 11 articles representing 6 unique interventions were included in the systematic review. Acceptability 6 (100%), appropriateness 6 (100%), and feasibility 5(83%) were the most frequently evaluated implementation outcomes. Adoption 2 (33%), fidelity 1 (17%), and cost 1 (17%) were rarely reported; penetration and sustainability were not reported. Conclusions This review contributes to implementation science literature by synthesizing key implementation outcomes of mHealth HIV/STI interventions targeting young people in LMICs. Future research is needed on m-health HIV/STI implementation outcomes, particularly the penetration, cost, and long-term sustainability of these interventions. Doing so will enhance the field’s understanding of the mechanisms by which these interventions lead or do not lead to changes in high HIV/STI risk and vulnerability among young people in LMICs.

scholarly journals Evaluating implementation strategies for essential newborn care interventions in low- and low middle-income countries: a systematic review

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii47-ii65
Author(s):  
Kimberly Peven ◽  
Debra Bick ◽  
Edward Purssell ◽  
Torill Alise Rotevatn ◽  
Jane Hyldgaard Nielsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Implementation Research ◽  
Newborn Care ◽  
Implementation Strategies ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Essential Newborn Care ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Implementation Outcomes ◽  
Low Middle Income Countries

Abstract Neonatal mortality remains a significant health problem in low-income settings. Low-cost essential newborn care (ENC) interventions with proven efficacy and cost-effectiveness exist but have not reached high coverage (≥90%). Little is known about the strategies used to implement these interventions or how they relate to improved coverage. We conducted a systematic review of implementation strategies and implementation outcomes for ENC in low- and low middle-income countries capturing evidence from five medical and global health databases from 1990 to 2018. We included studies of implementation of delayed cord clamping, immediate drying, skin-to-skin contact (SSC) and/or early initiation of breastfeeding implemented in the first hour (facility-based studies) or the 1st day (community-based studies) of life. Implementation strategies and outcomes were categorized according to published frameworks: Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change and Outcomes for Implementation Research. The relationship between implementation strategies and outcomes was evaluated using standardized mean differences and correlation coefficients. Forty-three papers met inclusion criteria. Interventions included community-based care/health promotion and facility-based support and health care provider training. Included studies used 3–31 implementation strategies, though the consistency with which strategies were applied was variable. Conduct educational meetings was the most frequently used strategy. Included studies reported 1–4 implementation outcomes with coverage reported most frequently. Heterogeneity was high and no statistically significant association was found between the number of implementation strategies used and coverage of ENC. This review highlights several challenges in learning from implementation of ENC in low- and low middle-income countries, particularly poor description of interventions and implementation outcomes. We recommend use of UK Medical Research Council guidelines (2015) for process evaluations and checklists for reporting implementation studies. Improved reporting of implementation research in this setting is necessary to learn how to improve service delivery and outcomes and thereby reduce neonatal mortality.

scholarly journals A systematic review of interventions targeting men's alcohol use and family relationships in low- and middle-income countries

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Giusto ◽  
Eve Puffer
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Alcohol Use ◽  
Family Relationships ◽  
Problem Drinking ◽  
Skills Training ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Life Years ◽  
Family Level ◽  
Low And Middle Income

Background.Problem drinking accounts for 9.6% of disability-adjusted life years worldwide. It disproportionally affects men and has disabling physical, psychological, and behavioral consequences. These can lead to a cascade of negative effects on men's families, with documented ties to intimate partner violence (IPV) and child maltreatment. These multi-level problems are often exacerbated where poverty rates are high, including low and middle-income countries (LMICs). In contexts where strong patriarchal norms place men in positions of power, family-level consequences are often even more pronounced.Methods.We conducted a systematic review of the literature on interventions in LMICs targeting men's problem drinking and any family-related outcomes. Cochrane and PRISMA procedures guided the review. The search was conducted in PsychInfo, PubMed, and Web of Science.Results.The search yielded 1357 publications. Nine studies from four different countries met inclusion criteria. Of those, only one had the primary goal of simultaneously improving drinking and a related family-level outcome (IPV). Six of the studies documented modest improvements on both drinking and couples or family outcomes. Strategies common to these included cognitive-behavioral techniques, communication skills training, narrative therapy, and participatory learning. Gender-transformative approaches were associated with reduced IPV and more equitable gender norms, and motivational interviewing and behavioral approaches were beneficial for reducing alcohol use.Conclusions.Findings highlight the scarcity of interventions addressing men's drinking and its effects on families, particularly for parent-child outcomes. However, results point to strategies that, combined with other evidence-based family interventions can guide the development and rigorous evaluation of integrated programs.

scholarly journals Clinical and patient-centered implementation outcomes of mHealth interventions for type 2 diabetes in low-and-middle income countries: a systematic review

2022 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Moses Mokaya ◽  
Florence Kyallo ◽  
Roman Vangoitsenhoven ◽  
Christophe Matthys
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Implementation Outcomes ◽  
Percentage Difference ◽  
Low And Middle Income

Abstract Background The prevalence of Type 2 Diabetes is rising in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs), affecting all age categories and resulting in huge socioeconomic implications. Mobile health (mHealth) is a potential high-impact approach to improve clinical and patient-centered outcomes despite the barriers of cost, language, literacy, and internet connectivity. Therefore, it is valuable to examine the clinical and implementation outcomes of mHealth interventions for Type 2 Diabetes in LMICs. Methods The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were applied in framing and reporting the review criteria. A systematic search of Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, and Ovid databases was performed through a combination of search terms. Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) and cohort studies published in English between January 2010 and August 2021 were included. Risk of bias for missing results in the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2). Quantitative and qualitative methods were used to synthesize the results. Results The search identified a total of 1161 articles. Thirty studies from 14 LMICs met the eligibility criteria. On clinical outcomes, 12 and 9 studies reported on glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c )and fasting blood glucose (FBG) respectively. Text messages was the most commonly applied mHealth approach, used in 19 out of the 30 studies. Ten out of the 12 studies (83.3%) that reported on HbA1c had a percentage difference of <0.3% between the mHealth intervention and the comparison group. Additionally, studies with longer intervention periods had higher effect size and percentage difference on HbA1c (1.52 to 2.92%). Patient-centred implementation outcomes were reported variedly, where feasibility was reported in all studies. Acceptability was reported in nine studies, appropriateness in six studies and cost in four studies. mHealth evidence reporting and assessment (mERA) guidelines were not applied in all the studies in this review.   Conclusion mHealth interventions in LMICs are associated with clinically significant effectiveness on HbA1 but have low effectiveness on FBG. The application of mERA guidelines may standardize reporting of patient-centered implementation outcomes in LMICs. Trial registration PROSPERO: Registration ID 154209.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document