P–465 Effect of letrozole over Ki–67 expression in breast cancer during controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) for fertility preservation (FP): case report

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
V S Vanni ◽  
R Cioffi ◽  
A Bergamini ◽  
V Sarais ◽  
S Signorelli ◽  
...  

Abstract Study question Does concomitant letrozole administration during COS alter Ki–67 expression in women undergoing FP procedures before breast cancer surgery? Summary answer Concomitant letrozole administration during COS, even for a short period, can reduce Ki–67 expression in breast cancer. What is known already The biggest concern with COS in breast cancer patients is the increase in serum estradiol levels, caused by the development of multiple follicles simultaneously. This has always been a major hindrance to the use of traditional ovarian stimulation regimens in these patients, due to the large amount of evidence on the pathogenetic role of estrogen in breast cancer propagation. To limit the rise of estradiol during COS, most centers have adopted concomitant letrozole administration. Recently, some studies have reported changes in tumor pathology after letrozole administration, such as a significant fall in Ki–67 expression. Study design, size, duration Case report including 2 patients undergoing COS with concomitant letrozole administration for 12 days before breast cancer surgery. Participants/materials, setting, methods The first patient was a 28-year-old Caucasian woman with a breast biopsy showing an infiltrating ductal carcinoma in the upper external quadrant of the right breast. The second patient was a 33-year-old Caucasian woman with a diagnosis of infiltrating ductal carcinoma of the upper external quadrant of the left breast. Both patients underwent COS with concomitant letrozole administration 5 mg daily for 12 days. Ovarian stimulation was performed using a GnRH-antagonist random-start protocol. Main results and the role of chance In the first patient, Ki–67 expression in the initial biopsy was 55%. After completion of FP procedures, she underwent quadrantectomy with sentinel-lymphnode biopsy. In the final histopathological report Ki–67 expression fell to 25%. In the second patient, the first biopsy showed a Ki–67 expression of 30%, while after mastectomy it fell to 10%. Limitations, reasons for caution Only 2 patients were included in the study. Wider implications of the findings: COS is feasible before breast cancer surgery, as long as an adequate cancer biopsy with immunohistochemical evaluation has been collected. Cytological diagnosis is not enough to start FP procedures. Evaluation of biological parameters after letrozole administration could lead to underestimation of cancer proliferation rate and to inappropriate treatment strategies. Trial registration number NA

2012 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 133-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
O.C. Iwuchukwu ◽  
J.R. Harvey ◽  
M. Dordea ◽  
A.C. Critchley ◽  
P.J. Drew

Author(s):  
Peter A. van Dam ◽  
Cary Kaufman ◽  
Carlos Garcia-Etienne ◽  
Marie-Jeanne Vrancken Peeters ◽  
Robert Mansel

Abstract: The role of the surgeon managing breast diseases has been the subject of continuous evolution, moving from the cancer-extirpative surgeon to a deeply informed surgical leader, who interacts in a multidisciplinary setting also encompassing tasks for risk assessment, genetic counselling, and new diagnostic approaches. Surgical removal of the tumour remains the cornerstone in treating early stage breast cancer. During the last century, breast cancer surgery became less radical, breast-conserving treatment emerged, and the role of axillary lymphadenectomy changed from a therapeutic procedure into a staging procedure with prognostic implications. Later, the sentinel node concept reduced the need for complete axillary clearance in most cases. Nowadays, thanks to breast-conserving surgery, oncoplastic techniques, and reconstructive procedures, most breast cancer patients can overcome this disease without serious permanent physical mutilation. A multidisciplinary approach, benchmarking, and quality assurance have improved outcomes markedly.


2018 ◽  
Vol 105 (2) ◽  
pp. e19-e30 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. McAnena ◽  
A. Lowery ◽  
M. J. Kerin

2020 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 671-679
Author(s):  
Jiayi Wu ◽  
Shuning Ding ◽  
Lin Lin ◽  
Xiaochun Fei ◽  
Caijin Lin ◽  
...  

PurposeThis retrospective study aimed to evaluate the distribution pattern and prognostic value of 21-gene recurrence score (RS) in Chinese patients with mucinous breast cancer (MC) and compared with infiltrating ductal carcinoma (IDC).Materials and MethodsPatients diagnosed with MC or IDC from January 2010 to January 2017 were retrospectively recruited. Reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction assay of 21 genes was conducted to calculate the RS. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess the association between RS and clinicopathological factors. Survival outcomes including disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank test.ResultsThe MC cohort included 128 patients and the IDC cohort included 707 patients. The proportions of patients with a low (RS < 18), intermediate (18-30), or high risk (RS > 30) were 32.0%, 48.4%, and 19.5% in MC cohort, and 26.9%, 46.8% and 26.3% in IDC cohort. The distribution of RS varied significantly according to different Ki-67 index and molecular subtype in both cohorts. Moreover, the receipt of chemotherapy was associated with RS in both cohorts. Among patients with MC, tumor stage was related to the DFS (p=0.040). No significant differences in DFS and OS were found among MC patients in different RS risk groups (OS, p=0.695; DFS, p=0.926).ConclusionRS was significantly related to Ki-67 index and molecular subtypes in MC patients, which is similar in IDC patients. However, RS was not able to predict DFS and OS in patients with MC.


2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 35
Author(s):  
Liuya JIANG ◽  
Na XIE ◽  
Xuelin YUAN ◽  
Hewei WANG ◽  
Jie JIA

2005 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 383-388 ◽  
Author(s):  
U. Veronesi ◽  
R. Orecchia ◽  
S. Zurrida ◽  
V. Galimberti ◽  
A. Luini ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document