scholarly journals Endometrial preparation: effect of estrogen dose and administration route on reproductive outcomes in oocyte donation cycles with fresh embryo transfer

2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (8) ◽  
pp. 1755-1764 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Madero ◽  
A. Rodriguez ◽  
R. Vassena ◽  
V. Vernaeve
2019 ◽  
Vol 112 (3) ◽  
pp. e154-e155
Author(s):  
Alyson M. Digby ◽  
Lesley Roberts ◽  
Mary M. Brown ◽  
Megan Dufton ◽  
Renda Bouzayen

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (7) ◽  
pp. 1623-1629
Author(s):  
Sofia Gaggiotti-Marre ◽  
Manuel Álvarez ◽  
Iñaki González-Foruria ◽  
Mònica Parriego ◽  
Sandra Garcia ◽  
...  

Abstract STUDY QUESTION Are progesterone (P) levels on the day before natural cycle frozen embryo transfer (NC-FET) associated with live birth rate (LBR)? SUMMARY ANSWER Regular ovulatory women undergoing NC-FET with serum P levels <10 ng/ml on the day before blastocyst transfer have a significantly lower LBR than those with serum P levels >10 ng/ml. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY The importance of serum P levels around the time of embryo transfer in patients undergoing FET under artificial endometrial preparation has been well established. However, no study has analyzed the importance of serum P levels in patients undergoing FET under a true natural endometrial preparation cycle. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This was a retrospective cohort study including 294 frozen blastocyst transfers under natural cycle endometrial preparation at a university-affiliated fertility centre between January 2016 and January 2019. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS All patients had regular menstrual cycles and underwent NC-FET with their own oocytes. Only patients who had undergone serum P measurement between 8 am and 11 am on the day before FET were included. Patients did not receive any external medication for endometrial preparation or luteal phase support. Patients were divided into two groups according to serum P levels below or above 10 ng/ml on the day before FET. Univariate analysis was carried out to describe and compare the cycle characteristics with reproductive outcomes. To evaluate the effect of P, a multivariable logistic model was fitted for each outcome after adjusting for confounding variables. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Mean serum P levels on the day before FET were significantly higher in patients who had a live birth compared to those who did not (14.5 ± 7.0 vs 12.0 ± 6.6 ng/ml, 95% CI [0.83; 4.12]). The overall clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) and LBR were 42.9% and 35.4%, respectively. Patients in the higher P group (>10 ng/ml) had a higher LBR (41.1% vs 25.7%: risk difference (RD) 15.4%, 95% CI [5; 26]) and CPR (48.6% vs 33.0%: RD 15.6%, 95% CI [4; 27]). Patients with higher serum P levels on the day before FET (63% of patients) had an improved LBR (odds ratio: 1.05; 95% CI [1.02; 1.09]). Women with serum P levels <10 ng/ml on the day before FET (37% of patients) had significantly higher weights (62.5 ± 9.9 vs 58.1 ± 7.1 kg, 95% CI [1.92; 6.90]) and BMI (22.9 ± 3.6 vs 21.6 ± 2.7 kg/m2, 95% CI [0.42; 2.25]) compared to patients with P levels >10 ng/ml. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION The main limitation of our study is its retrospective design. Other potential limitations are the detection of LH surge through urine testing and the inclusion of patients who did and did not undergo preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies. The protocol used in our institution for monitoring NC-FET does not look for the onset of progesterone secretion by the corpus luteum, and a slow luteinisation process or delay of corpus luteum function cannot be ruled out. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS We provide evidence that a minimum serum P threshold (P >10 ng/ml) might be required for improved reproductive outcomes in NC-FET. This result suggests that there are different mechanisms by which P is produced and/or distributed by each patient. This study also provides an excellent model to evaluate the impact of luteal phase defect through NC-FET. A prospective evaluation to assess whether P supplementation should be individualised according to patient’s needs is necessary to support our findings. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) No external funding was used, and there are no competing interests.


2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M L Boutet ◽  
L Youssef ◽  
L Erlandsson ◽  
E Hansson ◽  
D Manau ◽  
...  

Abstract Study question Does the presence of corpus luteum (CL) in in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatments affect maternal and fetal concentrations of hemopexin and α1-microglobulin in preeclampsia? Summary answer Decreased hemopexin and increased α1-microglobulin levels in maternal and fetal blood in IVF pregnancies with absence of CL particularly in pregnancies complicated by preeclampsia. What is known already: Pregnancies after frozen embryo transfer (FET) in programmed cycles have higher rates of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, suggesting a link between the absence of CL in programmed cycles and adverse maternal outcomes.Cardiovascular function is impaired early in pregnancy in women conceiving by IVF treatments in the absence of CL.Plasma relaxin–2, a potent vasodilator and stimulus of decidualization, has been reported to be undetectable in a non-CL cohort, but markedly elevated in a multiple-CL cohort through pregnancy.Hemopexin and α1-microglobulin act as scavengers that eliminate free heme-groups responsible for hemoglobin-induced oxidative stress known to contribute to preeclampsia development. Study design, size, duration A case-control study of 160 singleton pregnancies recruited from 2016 to 2020, including 54 spontaneous pregnancies from fertile couples, 50 conceived by IVF following fresh embryo transfer (ET) and FET in natural cycle (presence of CL) and 56 IVF after fresh oocyte-donation or FET in programmed cycles (absence of CL). Pregnancies were subclassified according to the presence of preeclampsia in uncomplicated, preeclampsia and severe preeclampsia cases. Participants/materials, setting, methods IVF pregnancies were recruited from a single Assisted Reproduction Center, ensuring homogeneity in IVF stimulation protocols, endometrial preparation, laboratory procedures and embryo culture conditions. Spontaneous pregnancies from fertile couples were randomly selected from our general population and matched to IVF by gestational age at birth. Hemopexin and α1-microglobulin concentrations were measured by ELISA in maternal and cord plasma collected at delivery. All comparisons were adjusted for age, ethnicity, prematurity, birthweight centile, oocyte-donation and FET cycles. Main results and the role of chance Parental ethnicity, body mass index, exposure to aspirin and corticoids during pregnancy, mean gestational age at birth and birthweight were similar in all study groups. While maternal hemopexin levels were lower in treatments without CL, the IVF group with one or several CL showed significantly increased hemopexin concentrations, both in uncomplicated and preeclampsia cases (uncomplicated: spontaneous conceptions median 1520 ug/ml [interquartile range 1054–1746], IVF with CL 1554 [1315–1778], IVF without CL 1401 [1130–1750]; Preeclampsia: spontaneous conceptions 1362 [1121–1667], IVF with CL 1372 [403–2558], IVF without CL 1215 [971–1498]). Maternal α1-microglobulin was significantly higher in the absence of CL in severe preeclamptic cases as compared to spontaneous pregnancies and IVF with CL (spontaneous conceptions median 23 ug/ml [interquantile range 20–24], IVF with CL 24 [24–26], IVF without CL 26 [25–28]). The cord blood profiles were identical to the maternal for both biomarkers. Overall, and in line with previous studies, preeclamptic pregnancies independently of the mode of conception, showed decreased concentrations of hemopexin and increased concentrations of α1-microglobulin both in maternal and fetal plasma, with more pronounced changes in severe preeclampsia cases. Limitations, reasons for caution Infertility factors contribution to the outcome cannot be unraveled from the assisted reproductive technologies procedure itself as we have only included spontaneous pregnancies from fertile couples. Adjustments for oocyte-donation and FET modalities were performed due to the higher proportion of these features in the ET in programmed cycles group. Wider implications of the findings: These findings acknowledge physiological differences between pregnancies following ET in stimulated and natural versus programmed cycles, supporting the hypothesis that the CL activity could influence perinatal results. This approach to perinatal outcomes in IVF patients could lead to changes in ET protocols in order to develop a CL if possible. Trial registration number Not applicable


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 425-429 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Hatoum ◽  
L. Bellon ◽  
N. Swierkowski ◽  
M. Ouazana ◽  
S. Bouba ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 116 (3) ◽  
pp. e341
Author(s):  
Nahid Punjani ◽  
Pietro Bortoletto ◽  
Phillip A. Romanski ◽  
Caroline Kang ◽  
Steven Spandorfer ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuel Álvarez ◽  
Sofía Gaggiotti-Marre ◽  
Francisca Martínez ◽  
Lluc Coll ◽  
Sandra García ◽  
...  

Abstract STUDY QUESTION Does an individualised luteal phase support (iLPS), according to serum progesterone (P4) level the day prior to euploid frozen embryo transfer (FET), improve pregnancy outcomes when started on the day previous to embryo transfer? SUMMARY ANSWER Patients with low serum P4 the day prior to euploid FET can benefit from the addition of daily subcutaneous P4 injections (Psc), when started the day prior to FET, and achieve similar reproductive outcomes compared to those with initial adequate P4 levels. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY The ratio between FET/IVF has spectacularly increased in the last years mainly thanks to the pursuit of an ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome free clinic and the development of preimplantation genetic testing (PGT). There is currently a big concern regarding the endometrial preparation for FET, especially in relation to serum P4 levels around the time of embryo transfer. Several studies have described impaired pregnancy outcomes in those patients with low P4 levels around the time of FET, considering 10 ng/ml as one of the most accepted reference values. To date, no prospective study has been designed to compare the reproductive outcomes between patients with adequate P4 the day previous to euploid FET and those with low, but restored P4 levels on the transfer day after iLPS through daily Psc started on the day previous to FET. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION A prospective observational study was conducted at a university-affiliated fertility centre between November 2018 and January 2020 in patients undergoing PGT for aneuploidies (PGT-A) IVF cycles and a subsequent FET under hormone replacement treatment (HRT). A total of 574 cycles (453 patients) were analysed: 348 cycles (leading to 342 euploid FET) with adequate P4 on the day previous to FET, and 226 cycles (leading to 220 euploid FET) under iLPS after low P4 on the previous day to FET, but restored P4 levels on the transfer day. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Overall we included 574 HRT FET cycles (453 patients). Standard HRT was used for endometrial preparation. P4 levels were measured the day previous to euploid FET. P4 > 10.6 ng/ml was considered as adequate and euploid FET was performed on the following day (FET Group 1). P4 < 10.6 ng/ml was considered as low, iLPS was added in the form of daily Psc injections, and a new P4 analysis was performed on the following day. FET was only performed on the same day when a restored P4 > 10.6 ng/ml was achieved (98.2% of cases) (FET Group 2). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Patient’s demographics and cycle parameters were comparable between both euploid FET groups (FET Group 1 and FET Group 2) in terms of age, weight, oestradiol and P4 levels and number of embryos transferred. No statistically significant differences were found in terms of clinical pregnancy rate (56.4% vs 59.1%: rate difference (RD) −2.7%, 95% CI [−11.4; 6.0]), ongoing pregnancy rate (49.4% vs 53.6%: RD −4.2%, 95% CI [−13.1; 4.7]) or live birth rate (49.1% vs 52.3%: RD −3.2%, 95% CI [−12; 5.7]). No significant differences were also found according to miscarriage rate (12.4% vs 9.2%: RD 3.2%, 95% CI [−4.3; 10.7]). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Only iLPS through daily Psc was evaluated. The time for Psc injection was not stated and no serum P4 determinations were performed once the pregnancy was achieved. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Our study provides information regarding an ‘opportunity window’ for improved ongoing pregnancy rates and miscarriage rates through a daily Psc injection in cases of inadequate P4 levels the day previous to FET (P4 < 10.6 ng/ml) and restored values the day of FET (P4 > 10.6 ng/ml). Only euploid FET under HRT were considered, avoiding one of the main reasons of miscarriage and implantation failure and overcoming confounding factors such as female age, embryo quality or ovarian stimulation protocols. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) No external funding was received. B.C. reports personal fees from MSD, Merck Serono, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, IBSA and Gedeon Richter outside the submitted work. N.P. reports grants and personal fees from MSD, Merck Serono, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Theramex and Besins International and personal fees from IBSA and Gedeon Richter outside the submitted work. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03740568.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document