Common Market Law Review. Vol. I, No. I, 061963. Published in co-operation with the British Institute of International and Comparative Law and the Europa Instituut of the University of Leyden. Editors ProfessorI. Samkalden and MrDennis Thompson. [London: Stevens & Sons; Leyden: A. W. Sythoff; South Hackensack, New Jersey: F. B. Rothman & Co.1963. 111 pp. Annual subscription £5, D. fl. 50, U.S. $15; 4 parts per annum, 25s. per part.]

1964 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 329-331
Author(s):  
Valentine Korah
Keyword(s):  
New Jersey ◽  
Comparative Law ◽  
Common Market ◽  
Annual Subscription ◽  
British Institute ◽  
The University

The European Convention on Human Rights and International Law

2007 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 217-231 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luzius Wildhaber
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
International Law ◽  
Comparative Law ◽  
Case Law ◽  
European Convention ◽  
Mutual Relationship ◽  
Public International Law ◽  
European Court ◽  
Special Character ◽  
British Institute

AbstractThis article is an expanded and footnoted version of the lectur given at the British Institute of International and Comparative Law on Tuesday 21 March 2006, entitled ‘International Law in the European Court of Human Rights’.The article begins with some comparative comments on the application of the European Convention on Human Rights in monistic and dualistic systems It then discusses in detail the European Court's case law which confirms that the Convention, despite its special character as a human rights treaty, is indeed part of public international law. It concludes that the Convention and international law find themselves in a kind of interactive mutual relationship. checking and buildine on each other.

The Influence of Swiss Private International Law on the Italian Codification

2002 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 244-255
Author(s):  
Andrea Bonomi
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
International Law ◽  
Information Society ◽  
Comparative Law ◽  
The Other ◽  
The Internet ◽  
Private International Law ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The University

The subject of this contribution is the influence of Swiss Private International Law (PIL) on the Italian codification. This topic could be regarded as rather old-fashioned. One of the terms of the comparison, the Italian statute of private international law, goes back to May 1995 and the other, the Swiss PIL Act, is even older, almost “prehistoric” since it was adopted in 1987 and entered into force on the 1st January 1989, that means in an era which preceded the advent of the Internet and the “Information Society.” Not even the idea of comparing these two pieces of legislation is an entirely new one, since a very accurate comparative analysis of the two codifications has already been done by Mr. Dutoit, professor of PIL and comparative law at the University of Lausanne, in an article of 1997.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document