International Dispute Settlement. By J. G. Merrills. [London: Sweet & Maxwell (Modern Legal Studies). 1984. xvi + 211 pp. £13 (paperback: £6.95)] - Dispute Settlement in Public International Law: Texts and Materials. Compiled by K. Oellers-Frahm and N. Wuhler. [Berlin: Springer Verlag. 1984. xx + 913 pp. DM.240]

1985 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 858-860
Author(s):  
Hazel Fox
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Public International Law ◽  
Legal Studies ◽  
International Dispute ◽  
Law Texts

International Law and the European Union

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jed Odermatt
Keyword(s):  
European Union ◽  
International Law ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
The European Union ◽  
International Affairs ◽  
Public International Law ◽  
International Dispute ◽  
International Legal Order ◽  
The Impact ◽  
The Eu

The European Union plays a significant role in international affairs. International Law and the European Union examines the impact this has had on public international law by integrating perspectives from both EU law and international law. Its analysis focuses on fields of public international law where the EU has had an influence, including customary international law, the law of treaties, international organizations, international dispute settlement, and international responsibility. International Law and the European Union shows how the EU has had a subtle but significant impact on the development of international law and how the international legal order has developed and adjusted to accommodate the EU as a distinct legal actor. In doing so, it contributes to our understanding of how international law addresses legal subjects other than States.

Not Like the Others? The Position of Associated States and Dependent Territories in Fishing Disputes

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 471-486
Author(s):  
Marco Benatar
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
Fisheries Management ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
The Other ◽  
Applicable Law ◽  
International Dispute ◽  
The Pacific ◽  
The One ◽  
Regional Fisheries Management Organizations ◽  
Law Making

Abstract Fisheries are of vital concern to associated states and dependent territories located in diverse regions ranging from the Pacific to the Atlantic. The special characteristics of these actors have led to innovative international law-making, including the terms that have been agreed within regional fisheries management organizations and arrangements to facilitate representation of non-metropolitan territories’ interests. The question may be raised whether similar innovations can be found in the field of international dispute resolution. The aim of this brief article is to consider some linkages between associated states and dependent territories on the one hand and international dispute settlement concerning fishing on the other. Four such connections will be examined in turn: access to court, representation in proceedings, applicable law in proceedings, and the territorial exclusion of disputes.

Domestic Jurisdiction over International Financial Institutions for Injuries to Project-Affected Individuals

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 105-136
Author(s):  
Clemens Treichl ◽  
August Reinisch
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
Financial Institutions ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Project Finance ◽  
International Financial Institutions ◽  
International Dispute ◽  
The Us ◽  
Us Supreme Court ◽  
Domestic Courts ◽  
Domestic Jurisdiction

Project-affected individuals are increasingly bringing tort claims against international financial institutions in domestic courts. In the US, such plaintiffs such plaintiffs have regularly failed to overcome the obstacle of the defendant institutions’ jurisdictional immunity under the International Organizations Immunities Act. In pending litigation, the US Supreme Court has resolved a long-standing debate as to its scope. This paper examines the issue of jurisdictional immunity in the context of international project finance. It focuses on the specific frameworks established in treaties, analyses the interplay between international and domestic US norms and looks at possible implications of the exercise of domestic jurisdiction. A key finding is that US courts, at least previously, used to grant more extensive immunities than international law required. While doubts persist as to whether domestic courts are a suitable venue for claims brought by project-affected people, existing means of international dispute settlement should be strengthened.

An Appraisal of the Gulf Cooperation Council's Mechanisms for Co-operation and the Settlement of Disputes

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 321-345
Author(s):  
Abdulmalik M. ALTAMIMI
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Legal Analysis ◽  
Commercial Arbitration ◽  
Public International Law ◽  
Interstate Disputes ◽  
Basic Law ◽  
Peaceful Settlement ◽  
Arab League ◽  
Settlement Of Disputes

AbstractThis paper aims to provide a comprehensive legal analysis, reminding the reader of the missing roles and potential of the the Gulf Cooperation Council [GCC]. Interstate disputes threaten the very existence of the GCC. Moreover, they call into question the GGC's mechanisms for co-operation and for ensuring the peaceful settlement of disputes. For instance, the GCC's Charter, commercial arbitration rules, and the Basic Law of the Economic Judiciary Commission all provide provisions for peacefully settling disputes between GCC Member States and their citizens. GCC states are also members of the League of Arab States [Arab League], another important regional organization with dispute settlement procedures. However, GCC and Arab League judicial and quasi-judicial mechanisms have not been invoked to date, arguably because the states prefer a diplomatic settlement. This paper reviews the GCC's mechanisms for co-operation and dispute settlement, referencing public international law to formulate recommendations to reform the GCC.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document