scholarly journals The surgical management of type IA endoleak after thoracic endovascular aortic repair

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 346-353
Author(s):  
Yaojun Dun ◽  
Yi Shi ◽  
Hongwei Guo ◽  
Yanxiang Liu ◽  
Xiangyang Qian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Management ◽  
Circulatory Arrest ◽  
Artery Bypass ◽  
Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair ◽  
Endovascular Aortic Repair ◽  
Elephant Trunk ◽  
Direct Closure ◽  
Aortic Repair ◽  
Type Ia

Abstract OBJECTIVES Our goal was to investigate the surgical strategy for type Ia endoleak after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) by reporting our experiences. METHODS From November 2012 to September 2019, a total of 23 patients received surgical management for type Ia endoleak after TEVAR. RESULTS The operations included total arch replacement with the frozen elephant trunk technique in 15 patients, direct closure of the endoleak in 2 patients, hybrid aortic arch repair in 4 patients, arch debranching with TEVAR in 1 patient and left common carotid artery to left subclavian artery bypass with TEVAR in 1 patient. Among 21 patients with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), the mean CPB and aortic cross-clamp times were 146.7 ± 42.2 and 81.0 ± 43.3 min, respectively. The selective cerebral perfusion time was 18.8 ± 8.2 min in 17 patients with hypothermic circulatory arrest. The in-hospital mortality was 8.7% (2/23). Type Ia endoleak was sealed successfully after surgery in 95.5% (21/22) of patients. The follow-up data were available for all 21 survivors. The median follow-up period was 18 months (range 1–84 months). During the follow-up period, a total of 8 patients died or had aortic events, including 5 deaths and 6 aortic events. CONCLUSIONS Different surgical strategies could be selected to treat patients with type Ia endoleak after TEVAR, with acceptable early and late outcomes.

Evaluation of EndoAnchor Aortic Wall Penetration After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 240-247
Author(s):  
Andrés Reyes Valdivia ◽  
Sara Busto Suárez ◽  
África Duque Santos ◽  
Ahmad Amer Zanabili Al-Sibbai ◽  
Claudio Gandarias Zúñiga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Thoracic Aorta ◽  
Aortic Wall ◽  
Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair ◽  
Endovascular Aortic Repair ◽  
Descending Thoracic Aorta ◽  
Aortic Repair ◽  
Type Ia ◽  
Endograft Infection ◽  
Academic Vascular Surgery

Purpose: To analyze aortic wall penetration of Heli-FX EndoAnchors after use in seal zones in the aortic arch or descending thoracic aorta during thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Materials and Methods: From May 2014 to May 2019, 25 patients (mean age 70.5±10 years; 16 women) were treated with TEVAR and adjunctive use of the Heli-FX device in 3 academic vascular surgery departments. Computed tomography scans were retrospectively reviewed to determine the location [arch or descending thoracic aorta (DTA)] of the EndoAnchors and the adequacy of aortic wall penetration, defined as adequate (≥2 mm), partial (<2 mm), or inadequate wall penetration (including loss). Endoleaks, reinterventions, and mortality were assessed. Results: A total of 161 EndoAnchors were deployed (median 7 per patient, range 4–9). Twenty-two EndoAnchors were place in the arch (zones 0–2) and 139 in the DTA (zones 3–5). A larger proportion of arch deployments (27%) had suboptimal penetration compared with the DTA (6.5%; p<0.005), resulting in a 91% adequate wall penetration rate for the series overall. Three EndoAnchors were lost (and only 1 retrieved) in 3 different patients, with no additional morbidity; thus, an overall deployment success rate of 88% was achieved. At a mean follow-up of 16.6±14 months, 4 patients required 5 (successful) reinterventions, including one for a type Ia endoleak treated with chimney TEVAR. One patient died 10 months after treatment due to endograft infection, without an opportunity for surgical correction. Conclusion: EndoAnchors have a higher risk of maldeployment in the arch, though this may be attributable to the small learning curve experience in this location. The best aortic wall penetration for this series was in the DTA, where EndoAnchors proved useful for distal endograft fixation during TEVAR.

Predictive Factors for Endoleaks and Aneurysm Enlargement after Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair of Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm

2021 ◽  
Vol 104 (5) ◽  
pp. 733-739
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Aneurysm ◽  
Ct Angiography ◽  
Predictive Factors ◽  
Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm ◽  
Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair ◽  
Endovascular Aortic Repair ◽  
Neck Length ◽  
Aortic Repair ◽  
Type Ia

Objective: To analyze the incidence and predictive factors of endoleaks and associated increased aneurysm size after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Materials and Methods: The medical records and computed tomography (CT) angiography imaging of 69 patients with thoracic aortic aneurysm that underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair at a single institute between June 2012 and May 2019 were reviewed. The incidences of endoleak were calculated. The patients’ demographic data, operative details, and imaging data were collected. The risk factors of endoleak occurrence were analyzed between endoleak and non-endoleak groups. The association between endoleak and aneurysm enlargement was also evaluated. Results: Endoleaks were noted in twenty-nine cases (42.0%) including four type Ia (5.8%), six type Ib (8.7%), seventeen type II (24.6%), and two type III (2.9%). Fifty-nine percent of the patients with endoleak were found with aneurysm enlargement. The predictive factors of endoleak were bird beak configuration and distal neck length of less than 20 mm (p=0.014 and 0.019, respectively). For type Ia, endoleak presented with short proximal neck length (p=0.031). Short distal neck and angulation of distal stent less than 160 degrees were the predictive factors of type Ib endoleak (p=0.045 and <0.001, respectively). Increased number of intercostal arteries is the only significant risk factor of type II endoleak (p=0.005). The other complications were endograft migration in about 5.8%, endograft infection in 2.9%, cerebrovascular complications in 5.8%, and ruptured aortic aneurysm in 2.9%. Conclusion: Interval follow up CT angiography is recommended to detect endoleak and other late complications after TEVAR. Special considerations are noted in the underlying renal insufficiency and the young patient for radiation dose in long term follow up. Keywords: Endoleak, Thoracic endovascular aortic repair, Thoracic aortic aneurysm, CT angiography, Aneurysm enlargement

scholarly journals Follow-up outcomes after the frozen elephant trunk technique in chronic type B dissection

2020 ◽  
Vol 57 (5) ◽  
pp. 904-911 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eduard Charchyan ◽  
Denis Breshenkov ◽  
Yuriy Belov
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Dissection ◽  
Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair ◽  
Endovascular Aortic Repair ◽  
Type B ◽  
Type B Aortic Dissection ◽  
Chronic Type ◽  
Elephant Trunk ◽  
Type A Aortic Dissection ◽  
Aortic Repair

Abstract OBJECTIVES Our goal was to present our experience with a hybrid approach to the frozen elephant trunk (FET) technique for the treatment of patients with chronic type B aortic dissection. METHODS Between January 2013 and July 2019, 86 patients underwent the FET procedure at our centre. In 20 patients, the indication was chronic type B aortic dissection with a concomitant proximal aortic lesion. We evaluated the sites of proximal and distal entries, luminal communication and originating visceral branches in the computed tomography scan data. Primary end points were hospital deaths, complications and follow-up survival. Secondary end points included reintervention, thrombosis of the false lumen and aortic remodelling. RESULTS There were no deaths, neurological complications or paraplegia during hospitalization; however, a few patients (10%) had temporary acute renal failure or required secondary aortic reintervention during the follow-up period. We performed thoracic endovascular aortic repair with stable aortic remodelling during follow-up. The follow-up survival rate was 92.3%, and 87.5% of cases did not require aortic reintervention. CONCLUSIONS The FET technique is an effective method for treating chronic Stanford type B aortic dissection in patients at high risk of retrograde type A aortic dissection, concomitant disease of the proximal aorta and unsuitable anatomy for thoracic endovascular aortic repair, which allows for single-stage radical correction. Compared with thoracic endovascular aortic repair, the FET technique excludes the risk of type Ia endoleak, retrograde type A aortic dissection and possible stent graft migration. This technique provides comparable midterm follow-up outcomes and freedom from reintervention.

Comparison of Two Different Techniques for Isolated Left Subclavian Artery Revascularization During Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair in Zone 2

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 740-749 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriele Piffaretti ◽  
Giovanni Pratesi ◽  
Guido Gelpi ◽  
Mario Galli ◽  
Frank J. Criado ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Subclavian Artery ◽  
Left Subclavian Artery ◽  
Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair ◽  
Endovascular Aortic Repair ◽  
Entire Group ◽  
Aortic Repair ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Type Ia ◽  
Related Mortality

Purpose: To analyze the results of isolated left subclavian artery (LSA) revascularization during thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) using carotid-subclavian bypass (CSbp) or chimney grafts (CGs). Methods: A retrospective multicenter, observational study identified 73 patients (mean age 68±13 years, range 22–87; 56 men) with acute or chronic thoracic aortic lesions who underwent TEVAR with isolated LSA revascularization using either CSbp (n=42) or CGs (n=31) from January 2010 and February 2017. Primary endpoints were TEVAR-related mortality, postoperative stroke, freedom from type Ia endoleak, and LSA patency. Results: Primary technical success was achieved in all cases. Early TEVAR-related mortality was 4.2% (CSbp 2% vs CG 6%, p=0.571). Two (3%) patients had major ischemic strokes (one in each group). Mean follow-up was 24±21 months (range 1–72; median 15). Estimated freedom from TEVAR-related mortality was 93%±3% (95% CI 84.3% to 97.0%) at 12 and 36 months, with no significant difference between CSbp and CG (p=0.258). Aortic reintervention did not differ between the groups (CSbp 5% vs CG 6%, p=0.356); nor did freedom from type Ia endoleak (CSbp 98% vs CG 87%, p=0.134). Gutter-related endoleaks occurred in 4 (13%) CG patients, but none of the patients experienced sac enlargement or the need for reintervention and none died. Primary patency of the LSA was 100% for the entire group during the observation period. Conclusion: In our experience, LSA revascularization proved most satisfactory and equally effective with both the CSbp and CG techniques, without discernible differences at midterm follow-up.

Hypogastric Artery Stenting for Chronic Intermittent Spinal Cord Ischemia After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 801-804
Author(s):  
Catharina Gronert ◽  
Nikolaos Tsilimparis ◽  
Giuseppe Panuccio ◽  
Ahmed Eleshra ◽  
Fiona Rohlffs ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Spinal Cord Ischemia ◽  
Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair ◽  
Neurological Symptoms ◽  
Endovascular Aortic Repair ◽  
Hypogastric Artery ◽  
Lower Extremity Weakness ◽  
Aortic Repair ◽  
The Right

Purpose: To report a case of chronic intermittent spinal cord ischemia (SCI) after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) and its successful treatment using hypogastric artery stenting. Case Report: A 79-year-old patient presented in May 2013 with a thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA) and a contained rupture. He urgently underwent TEVAR that covered 274 mm of descending thoracic aorta without immediate postoperative signs of acute SCI. At 3-month follow-up, he reported repeating incidents of sudden lower extremity weakness leading to a fall with a humerus fracture. A neurological consultation revealed the tentative diagnosis of intermittent SCI caused by TEVAR and initially recommended a conservative approach. During the following year there was no clinical improvement of the symptoms. Computed tomography angiography showed a high-grade stenosis of the right hypogastric artery, which was stented in November 2014 to improve the collateral network of spinal cord perfusion. Following treatment, the patient had no further neurological symptoms; at 32 months after the reintervention, the imaging follow-up documented a patent stent and continued exclusion of the TAA. Conclusion: Intermittent neurological symptoms after TEVAR should be suspected as chronic intermittent SCI. The improvement of collateral networks of the spinal cord by revascularization of the hypogastric artery is a viable treatment option.

Evaluation of Aortic Zone 2 Proximal Landing Accuracy During Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair Following Carotid-Subclavian Revascularization

2021 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 355-360
Author(s):  
Sally H. J. Choi ◽  
Gary K. Yang ◽  
Keith Baxter ◽  
Joel Gagnon
Keyword(s):  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Common Carotid Artery ◽  
Retrospective Review ◽  
Average Distance ◽  
Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair ◽  
Endovascular Aortic Repair ◽  
Aortic Repair ◽  
Technical Accuracy ◽  
Corrective Procedures

Background: Adequate seal for thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) commonly requires landing in zone 2, but can prove to be challenging due to the tortuous and angulated anatomy of the region. Objectives: Our objective was to determine the proximal landing accuracy of zone 2-targeted TEVARs following carotid-subclavian revascularization (CSR) and its impact on clinical outcomes. Methods: Retrospective review of patients that underwent CSR for zone 2 endograft delivery at a tertiary institute between January 2008 and March 2018 was conducted. Technical outcomes were assessed by examining the incidence of intraoperative corrective maneuvers, 1a endoleaks and reinterventions. Distance to target and incidence of LSA stump filling were examined as radiographic markers of landing accuracy. Results: Zone 2-targeted TEVAR with CSR was performed in 53 patients for treatment of dissections (49%), aneurysms (30%) or trauma (21%). Nine (17%) cases required intraoperative corrective procedures: 5 (9%) proximal cuffs due to type 1a endoleak and 4 (8%) left common carotid artery (LCCA) stenting due to inadvertent coverage. Cases performed using higher resolution hybrid fluoroscopy machine compared to mobile C-arm were associated with increased proximal cuff use (OR 8.8; 95% CI 1.2-62.4). Average distance between the proximal edge of the covered graft to LCCA was 8 ± 1 mm and larger distances were not associated with higher rates of 1a endoleak. Twenty-eight (53%) cases of antegrade LSA stump filling were noted on follow-up imaging, but were not associated with higher rates of reinterventions (OR 0.8, 95% CI [0.2-4.6]). Three (6%) patients had a stroke within 30 days and 4 (8%) patients expired within 1 month. Intraoperative corrective maneuvers, post-operative 1a endoleak and reinterventions were not associated with higher rates of stroke or mortality. Conclusion: Using current endografts and imaging modalities, zone 2-targeted TEVARs have suboptimal technical accuracy.

Outcomes of Thoracic Endovascular Aneurysm Repair (TEVAR) in Patients With Connective Tissue Disorders

2020 ◽  
Vol 54 (8) ◽  
pp. 676-680
Author(s):  
Khalil Qato ◽  
Allan Conway ◽  
Eileen Lu ◽  
Nhan Nguyen Tran ◽  
Gary Giangola ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Connective Tissue ◽  
Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair ◽  
Endovascular Aortic Repair ◽  
Acute Type ◽  
Type B ◽  
Connective Tissue Disorders ◽  
Aortic Repair ◽  
Type B Dissection ◽  
Significant Difference

Objectives: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) remains controversial in patients with connective tissue disorders given the concern for durability. We report on the largest series to date on outcomes of patients with thoracic aortic disease and connective tissue disorders treated with TEVAR. Methods: The Vascular Quality Initiative registry identified 12 207 patients treated with TEVAR from January 2010 to December 2018, including 102 with Marfans, Ehlers-Danlos, or Loey-Dietz syndrome. Outcomes were analyzed per the Society for Vascular Surgery reporting standards. Results: Median age was 50.6 years (interquartile range: 57.0-75.0), and 62 (60.7%) were male. Eighty-eight (86.3%) patients had Marfan, 9 (8.8%) had Ehlers-Danlos, and 5 (4.9%) had Loey-Dietz syndrome. Twenty-six (25.5%) patients were treated for degenerative aneurysmal disease and 76 (74.5%) patients for type B dissections (33 acute, 31 chronic). Most common indications for interventions in patients with type B dissection were pain (n = 41), aneurysmal degeneration (n = 16), and malperfusion (n = 8), with 3 patients who presented ruptured. There was no significant difference in perioperative complications between acute/chronic dissections and aneurysms ( P = .14). Percutaneous access was utilized in 61.7% of patients, with a 2.9% rate of arterial injury requiring reintervention. Follow-up data were available for 75 (73.3%) patients at a mean follow-up of 15.6 months. Overall mortality was 5.3%. There were 30 patients with follow-up endoleak data, and 8 (26.7%) endoleaks were identified. All endoleaks were in patients treated for acute type B dissection, and all resolved after a mean of 2.1 reinterventions. Three patients treated for acute Type B Aortic Dissection (TBAD) had retrograde dissections requiring intervention. Discussion: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair for patients with connective tissue disorders can be performed with low perioperative mortality, spinal cord ischemia, or Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA). On follow-up, acute type B aortic dissections represent a higher risk subgroup with increased rates of endoleak and retrograde dissection. Closer follow-up for these patients and early reintervention may be beneficial.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document