58 CAGE Substance use Scores and Trajectories Over Time Following Burn Injury: A Burn Model System National Database Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S41-S42
Author(s):  
G G Grant ◽  
A E Wolfe ◽  
C R Thorpe ◽  
N S Gibran ◽  
G J Carrougher ◽  
...  
Burns ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 44 (8) ◽  
pp. 1882-1886 ◽  
Author(s):  
Theresa L. Chin ◽  
Gretchen J. Carrougher ◽  
Dagmar Amtmann ◽  
Kara McMullen ◽  
David N. Herndon ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Jamie Oh ◽  
Christopher Madison ◽  
Grace Flott ◽  
Elisha G Brownson ◽  
Stephen Sibbett ◽  
...  

Abstract Background People living with burn injury often report temperature sensitivity. However, its epidemiology and associations with health-related quality of life (HRQOL) are unknown. We aimed to characterize temperature sensitivity and determine its impact on HRQOL to inform patient education after recovery from burn injury. Methods We used the multicenter, longitudinal Burn Model System National Database to assess temperature sensitivity at 6, 12 and 24 months after burn injury. Chi-square and Kruskal-Wallis tests determined differences in patient and injury characteristics. Multivariable, multi-level generalized linear regression models determined the association of temperature sensitivity with Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWL) scores and Veterans RAND 12 (VR-12) physical (PCS) and mental health summary (MCS) component scores. Results The cohort comprised 637 participants. Two thirds (66%) experienced temperature sensitivity. They had larger burns (12% TBSA, IQR 4-30 vs 5% TBSA, IQR 2-15; p<0.0001), required more grafting (5% TBSA, IQR 1-19 vs 2% TBSA, IQR 0-6; p<0.0001), and had higher intensity of pruritus at discharge (11% severe vs 5% severe; p=0.002). After adjusting for confounding variables, temperature sensitivity was strongly associated with lower SWL (OR -3.2, 95% CI -5.2, -1.1) and MCS (OR -4.0, 95% CI -6.9, -1.2) at 6-months. Temperature sensitivity decreased over time (43% at discharge, 4% at 24-months) and was not associated with poorer HRQOL at 12 and 24 months. Conclusion Temperature sensitivity is common after burn injury and associated with worse SWL and MCS during the first year after injury. However, temperature sensitivity seems to improve and be less intrusive over time.


2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S189-S189
Author(s):  
J T Schulz ◽  
L F Espinoza ◽  
L C Simko ◽  
R K Holavanahalli ◽  
N S Gibran ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 604-611 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Godleski ◽  
Austin F Lee ◽  
Jeremy Goverman ◽  
David N Herndon ◽  
Oscar E Suman ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 101 (1) ◽  
pp. S71-S85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gretchen J. Carrougher ◽  
Alyssa M. Bamer ◽  
Samuel P. Mandell ◽  
Sabina Brych ◽  
Jeffrey C. Schneider ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 349-354 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miranda L Yelvington ◽  
Matthew Godleski ◽  
Austin F Lee ◽  
Jeremy Goverman ◽  
David N Herndon ◽  
...  

Burns ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barclay T Stewart ◽  
Gretchen J Carrougher ◽  
Elleanor Curtis ◽  
Jeffrey C Schneider ◽  
Colleen M Ryan ◽  
...  

Burns ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 293-302 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Sinha ◽  
M. Nabi ◽  
L.C. Simko ◽  
A.W. Wolfe ◽  
S. Wiechman ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Clifford C Sheckter ◽  
Sabina Brych ◽  
Gretchen J Carrougher ◽  
Steven E Wolf ◽  
Jeffrey C Schneider ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Burn survivors experience barriers to returning to work. For those who do return to work, little is known regarding whether they achieve pre-injury productivity (i.e., equivalent or gain in income compared to pre-injury income). Identifying patients at risk of not achieving pre-injury productivity is important for targeting services that support this population. Methods We extracted occupational and income data through 24 months post-injury from the multi-center, longitudinal Burn Model System National Database. Annual income was reported in six groups: <$25k, $25k-50k, $50k-99k, $100k-149k, $150k-199k, $>199k. Participants were classified by change in income at each follow up (i.e., gain, loss, equivalent). Explanatory variables included demographics, injury characteristics, insurance payer, employment status, and job type. Multi-level, multi-variable logistic regression was used to model return to productivity. Results 453 participants provided complete income data at discharge and follow up. Of the 302 participants employed pre-injury, 180 (60%) returned to work within 24 months post-injury. Less than half (138) returned to productivity (46% of participants employed pre-injury; 77% of those who returned to work). Characteristics associated with return to productivity included older age (median 46.9 vs 45.9 years, OR 1.03, p=0.006), Hispanic ethnicity (24% vs 11%, OR 1.80, p=0.041), burn size >20% TBSA (33.7% vs 33.0%, OR 2.09, p=0.045), and post-injury employment (54% vs 26%, OR 3.41, p<0.001). Conclusion More than half of employed people living with burn injury experienced loss in productivity within 24 months post-injury. Even if they return to work, people living with burn injuries face challenges returning to productivity and may benefit from vocational rehabilitation and/or financial assistance.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document