scholarly journals Habitat Heterogeneity, Host Population Structure, and Parasite Local Adaptation

2017 ◽  
Vol 109 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Curtis M Lively
2017 ◽  
Vol 100 (7) ◽  
pp. 763-774 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheng-Yong Xu ◽  
Dian-Rong Sun ◽  
Na Song ◽  
Tian-Xiang Gao ◽  
Zhi-Qiang Han ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
pp. 710-720 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yili Guo ◽  
Zhijun Lu ◽  
Qinggang Wang ◽  
Junmeng Lu ◽  
Yaozhan Xu ◽  
...  

Accumulating evidence suggests that density dependence, whether at early or late life stages, is an important mechanism regulating plant population structure. However, the opposing effects of habitat heterogeneity and species-level variation might have confounded the prevalence of density dependence in natural forests. These compatible ideas were rarely considered simultaneously. In this study, we applied a spatial statistical technique to examine (i) the prevalence of density dependence at late life stages after controlling for habitat heterogeneity and (ii) the relationships between species traits and the strength of density dependence in a newly established, 25 ha subtropical mountain forest plot in central China. Of the 88 (75%) tree species analyzed, 66 were found to exhibit density dependence predominantly at very close distances among neighbors in the species-rich subtropical forest. In addition, the strength of density dependence was associated with species traits. Our findings identified strong density dependence among trees that had greater stature and were rarer. We concluded that density dependence was a prevalent mechanism for regulating the population structure of most tree species and both habitat heterogeneity and species-level variation played crucial roles in shaping the strength of density dependence in natural forests.


BMC Genomics ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yubang Shen ◽  
Le Wang ◽  
Jianjun Fu ◽  
Xiaoyan Xu ◽  
Gen Hua Yue ◽  
...  

Flora ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 205 (12) ◽  
pp. 797-801 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grazielle Sales Teodoro ◽  
Eduardo van den Berg ◽  
Marcela de Castro Nunes Santos ◽  
Flávia de Freitas Coelho

Evolution ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 743 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc Lipsitch ◽  
Edward Allen Herre ◽  
Martin A. Nowak

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas Price ◽  
Lua Lopez ◽  
Adrian E. Platts ◽  
Jesse R. Lasky ◽  
John K. McKay

AbstractUnderstanding the genomic signatures, genes, and traits underlying local adaptation of organisms to heterogeneous environments is of central importance to the field evolutionary biology. Mixed linear mrsodels that identify allele associations to environment, while controlling for genome-wide variation at other loci, have emerged as the method of choice when studying local adaptation. Despite their importance, it is unclear whether this approach performs better than identifying environmentally-associated SNPs without accounting for population structure. To examine this, we first use the mixed linear model GEMMA, and simple Spearman correlations, to identify SNPs showing significant associations to climate with and without accounting for population structure. Subsequently, using Italy and Sweden populations, we compare evidence of allele frequency differentiation (FST), linkage disequilibrium (LD), fitness variation, and functional constraint, underlying these SNPs. Using a lenient cut-off for significance, we find that SNPs identified by both approaches, and SNPs uniquely identified by Spearman correlations, were enriched at sites showing genomic evidence of local adaptation and function but were limited across Quantitative Trait Loci (QTL) explaining fitness variation. SNPs uniquely identified by GEMMA, showed no direct or indirect evidence of local adaptation, and no enrichment along putative functional sites. Finally, SNPs that showed significantly high FST and LD, were enriched along fitness QTL peaks and cis-regulatory/nonsynonymous sites showing significant functional constraint. Using these SNPs, we identify genes underlying fitness QTL, and genes linking flowering time to local adaptation. These include a regulator of abscisic-acid (FLDH) and flowering time genes PIF3, FIO1, and COL5.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document