scholarly journals Toxicity, Response Rates and Survival Outcomes of Induction Cisplatin and Irinotecan Followed by Concurrent Cisplatin, Irinotecan and Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer

2010 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 334-342 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. M. Watkins ◽  
A. J. Zauls ◽  
P. L. Kearney ◽  
K. Shirai ◽  
B. N. Ruppert ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 78-78
Author(s):  
Andrzej Pawel Wojcieszynski ◽  
Abigail Berman Milby ◽  
John Peter Plastaras ◽  
James M. Metz ◽  
Smith Apisarnthanarax

78 Background: The effect of radiation therapy (RT) sequencing with surgery on clinical outcomes for locally advanced esophageal cancer patients is unclear. We hypothesized that RT given prior to surgery has superior survival outcomes compared to RT delivered after surgery. Methods: Patients with the following inclusion criteria were identified within 17 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registries from 1988-2006: adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus, esophagectomy, and RT. Data on demographics, tumor characteristics, and survival outcomes were extracted and compared between patients receiving preoperative and those receiving postoperative RT. Cox regression univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify parameters that were associated with cause-specific (CSS) and overall survival (OS). Results: A total of 2,579 patients met the defined criteria. Of these patients, 1,689 received preop RT and 890 received postop RT. Patients receiving preop RT compared to postop RT had improved 5-yr CSS (41% vs. 31%, p<0.0001) and OS (33% vs. 23%, p<0.0001). On univariate analysis, RT sequence, histology, T stage, nodal status, number lymph nodes examined, age, gender, marital status, race, and county income were significant independent predictors of OS. On multivariate analysis ( table ), preop RT continued to remain statistically significant for OS (HR 0.88; p = 0.034). Conclusions: Preoperative RT is associated with superior overall and cause-specific survival compared to postoperative RT and should be the preferred approach in combination with surgery for locally advanced esophageal cancer. [Table: see text]


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (16) ◽  
pp. 6967-6976 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camila T. B. Gabiatti ◽  
Mariane C. L. Martins ◽  
Daniela L. Miyazaki ◽  
Leandro P. Silva ◽  
Fabiana Lascala ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 15007-15007
Author(s):  
H. Iwase ◽  
M. Shimada ◽  
T. Tsuzuki ◽  
M. Okeya ◽  
K. Kobayashi ◽  
...  

15007 Background: Both oral fluoropyrimidine anti-cancer agent (UFT, S-1) and cisplatin can enhance the effectiveness of radiotherapy. We previously reported a phase II trial of UFT and cisplatin combined with radiotherapy (Int J Clin Oncol 8 (2003): 305–311) and a phase I trial of S-1 and cisplatin combined with radiotherapy (Jpn J Cancer Chemother 33 (2006): 224–229) for advanced esophageal cancer. The present study analyzes the efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy by using S-1 and cisplatin for locally advanced esophageal cancer. Methods: Chemoradiotherapy consisted of two courses. The first course included 30 Gy of radiotherapy given over 3 weeks, together with daily oral administration of S-1 (80 mg/m2/day) for 2 weeks and a 24-h infusion of cisplatin (70 mg/m2) on day 8. The second course of chemoradiotherapy was administered after 2 weeks. For patients who exhibited an objective response to chemoradiotherapy, at least 2 four-week courses consisting of chemotherapy of S-1 and cisplatinon were administered. If a patient was unable to take S-1 as a capsule, S-1 was administered in the powdered form with water. Results: Fifty-nine patients were enrolled. They had the following characteristics: median age 65 years; M/F 52/7; PS 0/1/2: 33/19/7. There were 9 patients with stage II tumors and 50 with stage III. Fifty-four patients (92%) completed 2 courses of chemoradiotherapy. The major toxicity was myelosuppression. Fifteen patients (25%) developed grade 3 leukocytopenia, while 7 patients (12%) developed grade 4 leukocytopenia. Nonhematologic toxicity was moderate: grade 2 nausea/vomiting, pain, oral mucositis, and renal dysfunction occurred in 20%, 12%, 5% and 5% of patients, respectively. In stage II cases, complete response (CR), partial response (PR), and response rates were 78%, 22%, and 100%, respectively. In stage III cases, CR, PR, and response rates were 58%, 32%, and 90%, respectively. All stage II patients survived. In stage III cases, the 1-year survival rate was 70% and the 3-year survival rate was 44%. Conclusions: Chemoradiotherapy with S-1 and cisplatin is convenient, tolerable, and effective, and may be a promising nonsurgical management option for patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2020 ◽  
Vol 152 ◽  
pp. S568
Author(s):  
I. Alda Bravo ◽  
S. Fernandez Alonso ◽  
M. Alarza Cano ◽  
M.Á. Pérez-Escutia ◽  
R. D'Ambrossi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document