Coordination of Care and Care Transitions With Primary Care Clinicians, Specialty Palliative Care, and Hospice

Author(s):  
Areeba Jawed ◽  
Joseph D. Rotella

Patients with chronic kidney disease typically have needs that cut across a range of services, including nephrology, other specialties, primary care, and palliative care. This chapter proposes a model of integrated supportive care from diagnosis to end of life that coordinates the efforts and maximizes the benefits of different healthcare teams. Supportive care teams can learn primary kidney supportive care skills to manage symptoms, provide emotional support, and facilitate conversations that focus on what matters most to patients and families. Applying best practices of care coordination, they can facilitate seamless transitions as the patient’s condition evolves.

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Ruiz ◽  
Lynne Page Snyder ◽  
Katherine Giuriceo ◽  
Joanne Lynn ◽  
Erin Ewald ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and Objectives Care coordination and palliative care supports are associated with reduced anxiety, fewer hospital admissions, and improved quality of life for patients and their families. Early palliative care can result in savings in the end-of-life period, but there is limited evidence that larger-scale models can improve both utilization and the cost of care. Three models that received Health Care Innovation Awards from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services aimed to improve quality of care and reduce cost through the use of innovative care coordination models. This study explores the total cost of care and selected utilization outcomes at the end-of-life for these innovative models, each of which enrolled adults with multiple chronic conditions and featured care coordination with advance care planning as a component of palliative care. These included a comprehensive at-home supportive care model for persons predicted to die within a year and two models offering advance care planning in nursing facilities and during care transitions. Research Design and Methods We used regression models to assess model impacts on costs and utilization for high-risk Medicare beneficiaries participating in the comprehensive supportive care model (N = 3,339) and the two care transition models (N = 587 and N = 277) who died during the study period (2013–2016), relative to a set of matched comparison patients. Results Comparing participants in each model who died during the study period to matched comparators, two of the three models were associated with significantly lower costs in the last 90 days of life ($2,122 and $4,606 per person), and the third model showed nonsignificant differences. Two of the three models encouraged early hospice entry in the last 30 days of life. For the comprehensive at-home supportive care model, we observed aggregate savings of nearly $19 million over the study period. One care transition model showed aggregate savings of over $500,000 during the same period. Potential drivers of these cost savings include improved patient safety, timeliness of care, and caregiver support. Discussion and Implications Two of the three models achieved significant lower Medicare costs than a comparison group and the same two models also sustained their models beyond the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services award period. These findings show promise for achieving palliative care goals as part of care coordination innovation.


2020 ◽  
Vol 37 (11) ◽  
pp. 985-987
Author(s):  
Benjamin Roberts ◽  
Scott M. Wright ◽  
Colleen Christmas ◽  
Mariah Robertson ◽  
David Shih Wu

Context: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic laid bare the immediate need for primary palliative care education for many clinicians. Primary care clinicians in our health system reported an urgent need for support in advance care planning and end-of-life symptom management for their vulnerable patients. This article describes the design and dissemination of palliative care education for primary care clinicians using an established curriculum development method. Objectives: To develop a succinct and practical palliative care toolkit for use by primary care clinicians during the COVID-19 pandemic, focused on 2 key elements: (i) advance care planning communication skills based on the narrative 3-Act Model and (ii) comfort care symptom management at the end of life. Results: The toolkit was finalized through an iterative process involving a team of end-users and experts in palliative care and primary care, including social work, pharmacy, nursing, and medicine. The modules were formatted into an easily navigable, smartphone-friendly document to be used at point of care. The toolkit was disseminated to our institution’s primary care network with practices spanning our state. Early feedback has been positive. Conclusion: While we had been focused primarily on the inpatient setting, our palliative care team at Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center pivoted existing infrastructure and curriculum development expertise to meet the expressed needs of our primary care colleagues during the COVID-19 pandemic. Through collaboration with an interprofessional team including end-users, we designed and disseminated a concise palliative care toolkit within 6 weeks.


Author(s):  
J. Pedro Teixeira ◽  
Sara A. Combs

Supportive care of patients with progressive kidney failure, like the care needed by all patients with chronic kidney disease and end-stage kidney disease, is most successfully provided through a multidisciplinary team. An effective kidney supportive care program requires that the multidisciplinary team be properly educated on the palliative needs of these patients and that team members develop primary palliative care skills to meet these needs. This chapter presents the case for why nephrology clinicians need to acquire primary palliative care knowledge and skills to better treat their patients. It reviews the existing state of supportive care for patients with kidney disease and of the training in primary palliative care currently provided to nephrology fellows and nephrologists. It recommends the development of a primary palliative care curriculum for members of the multidisciplinary kidney care team involved in patient care and makes suggestions on curriculum content for nephrology clinicians.


2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Graham Paget ◽  
Vakhtang Rekhviashvili

We are sure that all of us involved in the field of renal medicine in South Africa would agree that the guidelines, published on page 86 of this issue, around the supportive care of renal patients, especially those who cannot access renal replacement therapy – produced in collaboration between the South African Renal Society and the Association of Palliative Care Practitioners of South Africa – will prove valuable in assisting us in making difficult decisions and in providing constructive advice on the management of our patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD).South Africa’s GDP per capita, of around US$3600, places it within the upper-middle-income economic group. Unfortunately, our economy must cope with limited resources with the burden of both non-communicable and communicable diseases. We have one of the highest prevalences of HIV infection in the world, with high frequencies for the APOL1 G1 and G2 risk alleles for HIV-associated (and other) nephropathies [1]. The World Health Organization’s Global Health Observatory (https://www.who.int/data/gho) reports the crude prevalence of hypertension in South Africa at 24%, diabetes at 9.8%, overweight at 51.9% and physical inactivity at 37.2%.The South African Renal Registry [2] reports that 84% of South Africans rely on state-funded medical facilities. A metaanalysis by Kaze et al. [3] quotes the prevalence of CKD stages 3 to 5 to be around 4.8% of the population in sub-Saharan African countries, and in South Africa this amounts to some 2.7 million people with significant kidney disease. Considering our risk profile for renal disease, this is unlikely to be an overestimate. According to the renal registry, only around 11 000 individuals in South Africa are on dialysis or have functioning kidney transplants, with 3100 served by the public sector. Unfortunately, our transplantation rate is low – 4.8 pmp in the public sector and 15.2 pmp in the private sector between 1991 and 2015 [4]. Transplant centres in the UK reported adult deceased donor renal transplant rates between 24 and 66 per million population in 2018/19 [5].We have large numbers of individuals with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), who are on a palliative care path, not by choice, and this is distressing. These guidelines should not be a substitute for ongoing efforts by our government to “move as expeditiously as possible towards the full realisation of the right to healthcare services”, as enshrined in Section 27 of our constitution.We congratulate our nephrology and palliative care community, and thank our visiting Australian colleagues, for well thought out and practical guidelines, which cover all aspects of supportive care for ESRD patients, including effective and caring communication, symptom management, preserving renal function, end-of-life care, care of paediatric patients, and models for setting up a renal palliative care service. The South African Essential Drugs List was used where possible to ensure that the medications are universally available in South Africa. Graham Paget and Vakhtang RekhviashvilliSouth African Renal Society [see PDF file for references]


2018 ◽  
pp. bmjspcare-2018-001630 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louise Purtell ◽  
P Marcin Sowa ◽  
Ilse Berquier ◽  
Carla Scuderi ◽  
Carol Douglas ◽  
...  

ObjectivesFor many people with advanced kidney disease, their physical, psychological and emotional needs remain unmet. Kidney supportive care, fully integrating specialist kidney and palliative care teams, responds to the emotional and symptom distress in this cohort who may be on a non-dialysis care pathway or on dialysis and approaching end of life. We aimed to analyse and describe the operation and patient characteristics of a new kidney supportive care programme (KSCp).MethodsA multidisciplinary KSCp was introduced through a tertiary hospital in Brisbane, Australia. Operational information and characteristics of referred patients were collected from internal databases and electronic medical records and analysed descriptively. Patient data were collected using validated instruments to assess symptom burden, health-related quality of life, health state, functional status and performance at clinic entry and analysed descriptively.Results129 people with advanced kidney disease were referred to the KSCp within the first year (median age 74 (range 27.7–90.5), 48.1% female, median Charlson Comorbidity Index score 7 (IQR 6–8) and mean Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale Renal score 19.6±9.8). 59% were currently receiving dialysis. The leading reason for referral was symptom management (37%). While quality of life and health state varied considerably among the cohort, in general, these parameters were well below population norms.ConclusionsResults indicate that patients referred to the KSCp were those with a strong need for a patient-centred, integrated model of care. Shifting focus to co-ordinated, multidisciplinary care rather than discrete specialty silos appears key to addressing the challenging clinical problems in end-of-life care.


2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Ting Chua ◽  
Santhosh Seetharaman ◽  
Priyanka Khatri

Abstract Background and Aims Renal supportive care is a patient-centred approach to management of advanced chronic kidney disease, especially in elderly patients. Adoption of renal supportive care in Asian countries has been slow. This study aims to investigate the barriers towards renal supportive care as perceived by physicians in Singapore. Method An online survey was sent out to all practising and training nephrologists, geriatricians and palliative physicians in Singapore public hospitals between October 1st and October 30th 2020. Responses were compiled and analysed. Results Out of 365 surveys sent, 75 nephrologists, 43 geriatricians and 28 palliative care physicians responded, accounting for a 40% response rate. Most of the participants managed 16 to 30 chronic kidney disease patients in a week. Older patients aged >75 years accounted for at least 30% of the chronic kidney disease cohort managed by 72% of respondents. Most agreed that renal supportive care aims to improve quality of life in chronic kidney disease (97.9%) and can be implemented alongside life-prolonging treatments such as dialysis (83.6%). However, only 51.4% recognised a distinction between renal supportive care and palliative care. Fewer nephrologists compared to geriatricians received prior palliative care training (54.7% vs 93.0%) or were certified advanced care planning facilitators (33.3% vs 67.4%). All respondents agreed that nephrologists should be aware of basic principles of palliative care, and 89.7% felt that palliative care should be incorporated into nephrology training. Most were comfortable holding discussions regarding dialysis withholding and withdrawal (93.8% and 87.7% respectively), and managing symptoms of pain (74.7%), breathlessness (87.0%) and anticipated symptoms after dialysis withdrawal (78.8%). Fewer physicians were comfortable with managing symptoms of pruritus (65.1%) and restless legs syndrome (56.2%). Majority (60%) did not feel confident in providing spiritual support as part of end-of-life care. Main barriers to renal supportive care included inadequate time during clinic consults to address the patients’ needs (87%), reliance on family members to make decisions (69.2%), inadequate palliative training during fellowship (67.1%) and inadequate community support services (55.5%). Some cited lack of awareness and acceptability of renal supportive care amongst patients and relatives in Singapore’s Asian cultural context. Most felt that encouraging advanced care planning discussions earlier in the course of chronic kidney disease (80.8%), having dedicated renal supportive care services in hospital (78.1%) and including palliative care rotation as part of training (69.2%) could potentially increase uptake of renal supportive care in Singapore. Conclusion Nephrologists, geriatricians and palliative physicians in Singapore recognise the value of renal supportive care, but are faced with barriers such as patients’ and family’s resistance toward renal supportive care as well as inadequate palliative training. A unique model of renal supportive care with the patient as well as family’s involvement early in the decision-making process is likely to be better perceived in Asian countries. Incorporation of palliative care training in the nephrology fellowship curriculum should be considered.


Nephron ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 129 (3) ◽  
pp. 209-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer K. Harrison ◽  
Laura E. Clipsham ◽  
Caroline M. Cooke ◽  
Graham Warwick ◽  
James O. Burton

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 223-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingrid Gergei ◽  
Jens Klotsche ◽  
Rainer P. Woitas ◽  
Lars Pieper ◽  
Hans-Ulrich Wittchen ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
pp. gfw208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meghan J. Elliott ◽  
Sarah Gil ◽  
Brenda R. Hemmelgarn ◽  
Braden J. Manns ◽  
Marcello Tonelli ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document