Frailty and sarcopenia

2020 ◽  
pp. 521-531
Author(s):  
Andrew Clegg ◽  
Harnish Patel

Sarcopenia and frailty are inter-related expressions of ageing which identify people at risk of important adverse health events such as falls, disability, and mortality, and the consequent health and social care needs such as hospitalization or care home admission. Sarcopenia is the progressive and generalized loss of skeletal muscle mass and function with age. It has a complex aetiology involving neurohormonal, immunological, and nutritional mechanisms, and is a core component of frailty, which is characterized by reduced biological reserves across a range of physiological systems that increase vulnerability to adverse outcomes following minor stressor events. Detection of frailty should be an essential part of assessment of older people, and the Clinical Frailty Scale is a simple tool based on comprehensive geriatric assessment that enables assignment of a frailty category based on clinical judgement.

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 54
Author(s):  
Aisling M. O'Halloran ◽  
Peter Hartley ◽  
David Moloney ◽  
Christine McGarrigle ◽  
Rose Anne Kenny ◽  
...  

Background: There is increasing policy interest in the consideration of frailty measures (rather than chronological age alone) to inform more equitable allocation of health and social care resources. In this study the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) classification tree was applied to data from The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA) and correlated with health and social care utilisation. CFS transitions over time were also explored. Methods: Applying the CFS classification tree algorithm, secondary analyses of TILDA data were performed to examine distributions of health and social care by CFS categories using descriptive statistics weighted to the population of Ireland aged ≥65 years at Wave 5 (n=3,441; mean age 74.5 (SD ±7.0) years, 54.7% female). CFS transitions over 8 years and (Waves 1-5) were investigated using multi-state Markov models and alluvial charts. Results: The prevalence of CFS categories at Wave 5 were: 6% ‘very fit’, 36% ‘fit’, 31% ‘managing well’, 16% ‘vulnerable’, 6% ‘mildly frail’, 4% ‘moderately frail’ and 1% ‘severely frail’. No participants were ‘very severely frail’ or ‘terminally ill’. Increasing CFS categories were associated with increasing hospital and community health services use and increasing hours of formal and informal social care provision. The transitions analyses suggested CFS transitions are dynamic, with 2-year probability of transitioning from ‘fit’ (CFS1-3) to ‘vulnerable’ (CFS4), and ‘fit’ to ‘frail’ (CFS5+) at 34% and 6%, respectively. ‘Vulnerable’ and ‘frail’ had a 22% and 17% probability of reversal to ‘fit’ and ‘vulnerable’, respectively. Conclusions: Our results suggest that the CFS classification tree stratified the TILDA population aged ≥65 years into subgroups with increasing health and social care needs. The CFS could be used to aid the allocation of health and social care resources in older people in Ireland. We recommend that CFS status in individuals is reviewed at least every 2 years.


2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruth Fergie ◽  
Jennifer McCaughan ◽  
Peter Eves ◽  
Siddesh Prabhavalkhar ◽  
Girish Shivashankar ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and Aims Frailty is a measure of physiological reserve and the ability to respond to physiological stress. Increasing frailty predicts adverse health outcomes in patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD) Despite this, frailty is not routinely measured in clinical practice where clinician perception of frailty is used to inform decision making. The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) is a clinical judgement-based score that is a useful screening tool for frailty. Increasing frailty measured by CFS is predictive of adverse outcomes in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) including falls, worsening disability, care home admissions, hospitalizations and ultimately mortality. It has been widely used in the assessment of patients with COVID-19 to help inform decisions regarding ceiling of care. This study aimed to assess the correlation between clinician perception of frailty and frailty as measured using the CFS. Method Frailty was assessed for all patients undergoing in centre hospital haemodialysis (n=53) in a single dialysis unit in Northern Ireland. A CFS score was calculated for all patients by a clinician who routinely uses the CFS in clinical practice. Patients with a score of 1-3 were classified as not frail, 4-5 as intermediately frail and 6-9 as frail. Nephrologists received basic education about frailty. They were then asked to categorize their patients as non-frail, intermediately frail or frail. The relationship between measured and perceived frailty was assessed using percent agreement. Participant characteristics of frail patients who were misclassified as intermediately frail or non-frail by clinicians were compared to those patients correctly classified as non-frail by clinicians. Fisher’s exact test was employed for categorical variables and t-tests were employed for pseudo normally distributed continuous variables. Results Of the 53 participants, the median age was 59 years (26-89). 41.5% were women. The median time on dialysis was 1.6 years. According to the CFS, 6 patients were categorised as non-frail, 30 patients as intermediately frail and 17 as frail. Among frail participants, 41% were correctly perceived as frail by their nephrologist. Among non-frail participants, 100% were correctly perceived as non-frail by their nephrologist. Among those who were frail according to the CFS, those misclassified as intermediately frail or non-frail, were younger (median age of those misclassified 49 years vs 62 years of those not mis-classified, P=0.03) but did not differ by sex (P=1), time on dialysis (P=0.39), presence of diabetes (P=0.30) or presence of vascular disease (P=1). Conclusion In this study of adult patients undergoing chronic haemodialysis, perceived frailty correlated with measured frailty using the CFS less than 50% of the time. This suggests that clinical perception is not an accurate surrogate for frailty status in this population group. Additionally, this study suggests that younger patients with ESRD are less likely to be correctly perceived as frail. Such misclassification could influence clinical decisions for treatment, including candidacy for kidney transplantation.


2010 ◽  
Vol 30 (7) ◽  
pp. 1115-1134 ◽  
Author(s):  
DAVID CHALLIS ◽  
MICHELE ABENDSTERN ◽  
PAUL CLARKSON ◽  
JANE HUGHES ◽  
CAROLINE SUTCLIFFE

ABSTRACTThe quality of assessment of older people with health and social care needs has for some time been a concern of policy makers, practitioners, older people and carers in the United Kingdom and internationally. This article seeks to address a key aspect of these concerns, namely whether sufficient expertise is deployed when, as a basis for a care plan and service allocation, an older person's eligibility for local authority adult social-care services requires a comprehensive needs assessment of their usually complex and multiple problems. Is an adequate range of professionals engaged, and is a multi-disciplinary approach applied? The Single Assessment Process (SAP) was introduced in England in 2004 to promote a multi-disciplinary model of service delivery. After its introduction, a survey in 2005–06 was conducted to establish the prevalence and patterns of comprehensive assessment practice across England. The reported arrangements for multi-disciplinary working among local authority areas in England were categorised and reviewed. The findings suggest, first, that the provision of comprehensive assessments of older people that require the expertise of multiple professionals is limited, except where the possibility arose of placement in a care-home-with-nursing, and second that by and large a systematic multi-disciplinary approach was absent. Policy initiatives to address the difficulties in assessment need to be more prescriptive if they are to produce the intended outcomes.


2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 94-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alice K. Stevens ◽  
Helen Raphael ◽  
Sue M. Green

Purpose – Residential care for older people in the UK includes care homes with and without 24-hour Registered Nurse (RN) care. Reduced autonomy and personal wealth can result when people assessed as having minimal care needs, enter and reside in care homes with RN care. The purpose of this paper is to explore the experiences of older people with minimal care needs admission to care homes with RN care. Design/methodology/approach – A qualitative study using a grounded theory method was undertaken. In total, 12 care home with RN care residents assessed as not requiring nursing care were interviewed. Initial sampling was purposive and progressed to theoretical. Interviews were analysed using the grounded theory analysis method of constant comparison and theory development. Findings – Two main categories emerged: “choosing the path”, which concerned the decision to enter the home, and “settling in”, which related to adaptation to the environment. Findings suggested participants who perceived they had greater control over the decision-making process found it easier to settle in the care home. The two categories linked to form an emerging framework of “crossing the bridge” from independent living to care home resident. Research limitations/implications – The findings contribute to the understanding of factors influencing admission of older people with minimal care needs to care homes with RN care and highlight the importance of informed decision making. Practical implications – Health and social care professionals must give informed support and advice to older people seeking care options to ensure their needs are best met. Originality/value – This study enabled older people with minimal care needs admission to care homes with RN care to voice their experiences.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aisling M. O’Halloran ◽  
Peter Hartley ◽  
David Moloney ◽  
Christine McGarrigle ◽  
Rose Anne Kenny ◽  
...  

AbstractThere is increasing policy interest in the consideration of frailty measures (rather than chronological age alone) to inform a more equitable allocation of health and social care resources in the community. The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) has attracted interest for its simplicity and consideration of multiple relevant geriatric dimensions. However, a criticism of the CFS has been the possible subjectivity in the scoring, bringing the possible danger of lack of scoring consistency across agencies. For that reason, the authors of the CFS published a classification tree method to assist with routine scoring of the CFS.The aim of the present study was to apply the CFS classification tree to data from adults aged 65 and over from The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA) and correlate derived CFS categories with patterns of health and social care utilisation in Irish older people assessed in Wave 5 of the study (year 2018). In addition, we explored how CFS categories and states changed over 8 years in TILDA between Wave 1 (2010) and Wave 5.Results showed the following prevalence of CFS categories in Wave 5: 6% ‘very fit’ (CFS1), 36% ‘fit’ (CFS2), 31% ‘managing well’ (CFS3), 16% ‘vulnerable’ (CFS4), 6% ‘mildly frail’ (CFS5), 4% ‘moderately frail’ (CFS6) and 1% ‘severely frail’ (CFS7). No participants were ‘very severely frail’ or ‘terminally ill’. In wave 5, increasing CFS categories had an association with increasing utilisation of hospital and community health services, and increasing hours of formal and informal social care provision. The transitions analyses from Wave 1 to 5 suggested a dynamic picture of CFS transitions, with 2-year probability of transitioning from ‘fit’ (CFS1-3) to ‘vulnerable’ (CFS4), and ‘fit’ to ‘frail’ (CFS5+) at 34% and 6%, respectively. ‘Vulnerable’ and ‘frail’ had a 22% and 17% probability of reversal to ‘fit’ and ‘vulnerable’, respectively.Our results suggest that the CFS classification tree was able to stratify the TILDA population aged 65 and over into subgroups with increasing health and social care needs. The CFS classification tree could be used to aid the allocation of health and social care resources in older people in Ireland, but given the frequency of CFS transitions in the population, it is recommended that CFS status in individuals is reviewed at least every 2 years.


BMC Medicine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Vilches-Moraga ◽  
◽  
A. Price ◽  
P. Braude ◽  
L. Pearce ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The COVID-19 pandemic has placed significant pressure on health and social care. Survivors of COVID-19 may be left with substantial functional deficits requiring ongoing care. We aimed to determine whether pre-admission frailty was associated with increased care needs at discharge for patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19. Methods Patients were included if aged over 18 years old and admitted to hospital with COVID-19 between 27 February and 10 June 2020. The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) was used to assess pre-admission frailty status. Admission and discharge care levels were recorded. Data were analysed using a mixed-effects logistic regression adjusted for age, sex, smoking status, comorbidities, and admission CRP as a marker of severity of disease. Results Thirteen hospitals included patients: 1671 patients were screened, and 840 were excluded including, 521 patients who died before discharge (31.1%). Of the 831 patients who were discharged, the median age was 71 years (IQR, 58–81 years) and 369 (44.4%) were women. The median length of hospital stay was 12 days (IQR 6–24). Using the CFS, 438 (47.0%) were living with frailty (≥ CFS 5), and 193 (23.2%) required an increase in the level of care provided. Multivariable analysis showed that frailty was associated with an increase in care needs compared to patients without frailty (CFS 1–3). The adjusted odds ratios (aOR) were as follows: CFS 4, 1.99 (0.97–4.11); CFS 5, 3.77 (1.94–7.32); CFS 6, 4.04 (2.09–7.82); CFS 7, 2.16 (1.12–4.20); and CFS 8, 3.19 (1.06–9.56). Conclusions Around a quarter of patients admitted with COVID-19 had increased care needs at discharge. Pre-admission frailty was strongly associated with the need for an increased level of care at discharge. Our results have implications for service planning and public health policy as well as a person's functional outcome, suggesting that frailty screening should be utilised for predictive modelling and early individualised discharge planning.


2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 468-480
Author(s):  
Gemma Alcorn ◽  
Scott A Murray ◽  
Jo Hockley

Abstract Background Care home residents are increasingly frail with complex health and social care needs. Their transfer to hospital at the end-of-life can be associated with unwanted interventions and distress. However, hospitals do enable provision of care that some residents wish to receive. We aimed to explore the factors that influence hospital admission of care home residents who then died in hospital. Methods This study combined in-depth case note review of care home residents dying in two Scottish teaching hospitals during a 6-month period and semi-structured interviews with a purposive sample of 26 care home staff and two relatives. Results During the 6-month period, 109 care home residents died in hospital. Most admissions occurred out-of-hours (69%) and most were due to a sudden event or acute change in clinical condition (72%). Length of stay in hospital before death was short, with 42% of deaths occurring within 3 days. Anticipatory Care Planning (ACP) regarding hospital admission was documented in 44%. Care home staff wanted to care for residents who were dying; however, uncertain trajectories of decline, acute events, challenges of ACP, relationship with family and lack of external support impeded this. Conclusions Managing acute changes on the background of uncertain trajectories is challenging in care homes. Enhanced support is required to improve and embed ACP in care homes and to provide rapid, 24 hours-a-day support to manage difficult symptoms and acute changes.


The Lancet ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 390 (10103) ◽  
pp. 1630-1631 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Dilnot

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
◽  

Must-have collection of selected standards from Caring for Our Children, 3rd Edition which, when put into practice, are most likely to prevent serious adverse outcomes in child care and early education settings. Contents include: *Staffing *Program Activities for Healthy Development *Health Promotion and Protection *Nutrition and Food Service *Facilities, Supplies, Equipment, and Environmental Health *Play Areas/Playgrounds and Transportation *Infectious Disease *Children with Special Health Care Needs and Disabilities *Policies *Licensing and Community Action


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document