scholarly journals Care home residents who die in hospital: exploring factors, processes and experiences

2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 468-480
Author(s):  
Gemma Alcorn ◽  
Scott A Murray ◽  
Jo Hockley
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Admission ◽  
Care Home ◽  
External Support ◽  
Care Homes ◽  
Teaching Hospitals ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Care Needs ◽  
Care Home Staff ◽  
Health And Social Care ◽  
Acute Changes

Abstract Background Care home residents are increasingly frail with complex health and social care needs. Their transfer to hospital at the end-of-life can be associated with unwanted interventions and distress. However, hospitals do enable provision of care that some residents wish to receive. We aimed to explore the factors that influence hospital admission of care home residents who then died in hospital. Methods This study combined in-depth case note review of care home residents dying in two Scottish teaching hospitals during a 6-month period and semi-structured interviews with a purposive sample of 26 care home staff and two relatives. Results During the 6-month period, 109 care home residents died in hospital. Most admissions occurred out-of-hours (69%) and most were due to a sudden event or acute change in clinical condition (72%). Length of stay in hospital before death was short, with 42% of deaths occurring within 3 days. Anticipatory Care Planning (ACP) regarding hospital admission was documented in 44%. Care home staff wanted to care for residents who were dying; however, uncertain trajectories of decline, acute events, challenges of ACP, relationship with family and lack of external support impeded this. Conclusions Managing acute changes on the background of uncertain trajectories is challenging in care homes. Enhanced support is required to improve and embed ACP in care homes and to provide rapid, 24 hours-a-day support to manage difficult symptoms and acute changes.

scholarly journals Recognition of the complexity facing residential care homes: a practitioner inquiry

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 584-590 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenny Dudman ◽  
Julienne Meyer ◽  
Cheryl Holman ◽  
Wendy Moyle
Keyword(s):  
Residential Care ◽  
Care Home ◽  
Assessment Tools ◽  
Care Staff ◽  
Care Homes ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Care Home Staff ◽  
Healthcare Needs ◽  
Health And Social Care

AbstractAimTo explore the experiences and challenges for residential care home staff when managing the healthcare needs of their residents, in particular those living with dementia.BackgroundIncreasing number of older people, with complex health and social care needs are living in residential care homes. Yet there is limited appreciation of why staff sometimes struggle to manage residents’ healthcare needs, or understanding of their working relationship with district nurses (DNs), whose responsibility it is to provide nursing support.MethodsThis PhD study, in a metropolitan area in the United Kingdom, was conducted by an experienced DN and involved three phases. This paper focuses on the first two phases. Phase 1 data included: semi-structured interviews (n=8), reflective field notes based on non-participant observation, documentary analysis of policies, procedures and assessment tools and other contextual data from one care home (case study site). The practitioner researcher reflected on the findings from the case study, in relation to her own knowledge and experience as a DN, focusing in particular on findings that were familiar, or which surprised. In Phase 2 she fed these findings back to other care homes (n=11) to check whether the findings from the single case study were unique or resonated with others. She gathered their feedback through semi-structured interviews with senior care staff (n=14). Data were analysed using thematic data analysis.FindingsFindings highlight the complexity facing residential care homes: high levels of healthcare needs amongst residents, the demands of caring for residents living with dementia, variations in the knowledge and skill set of care staff, inequity in the level of healthcare support, the challenges of building a good relationship with DNs, and funding pressures facing care homes.ImplicationsAny, or all of these factors can prevent care home staff from managing the healthcare needs of their residents.

scholarly journals Admiral Nurse Case Management within Enhanced Health in Care Homes

2021 ◽  
Vol 05 (02) ◽  
pp. 1-1
Author(s):  
Zena Aldridge ◽  
◽  
Karen Harrison Dening ◽  
◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Service Provision ◽  
Quality Care ◽  
Care Home ◽  
Care Homes ◽  
Care Home Staff ◽  
Nurse Case Management ◽  
Specialist Services ◽  
Health And Social Care ◽  
Improve Access

The United Kingdom’s (UK) older population is higher than the global average. Over the next 20 years, England will see an increase in the number of older people who have higher levels of dependency, dementia, and comorbidity many of whom may require 24-hour care. Currently it is estimated that 70% of residents in nursing and residential care homes either have dementia on admission or develop it whilst residing in the care home. The provision of high-quality care for this population is a challenge with a lack of consistency in the provision of primary care and specialist services and a known gap in knowledge and skills. The NHS Long Term Plan aims to move care closer to home and improve out of hospital care which includes people who live in care homes by introducing Enhanced Health in Care Homes (EHCH). However, such services need to be equipped with the correct skill mix to meet the needs of the care home population. Admiral Nurses are specialists in dementia care and are well placed to support the delivery of EHCH and improve access to specialist support to care home residents, their families, care home staff and the wider health and social care system. This paper discusses current gaps in service provision and how both the EHCH framework, and the inclusion of Admiral Nurses, might redress these and improve outcomes.

scholarly journals Residents transitioning between hospital and care homes: protocol for codesigning a systems-level response to safety issues (SafeST study)

BMJ Open ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. e050665
Author(s):  
Jason Scott ◽  
Katie Brittain ◽  
Kate Byrnes ◽  
Pam Dawson ◽  
Stephanie Mulrine ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Data Extraction ◽  
Care Home ◽  
Incident Reporting ◽  
Care Homes ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Framework Analysis ◽  
Safety Issues ◽  
Care Home Staff ◽  
Service Specification ◽  
The Impact

IntroductionThe aim of this study is to develop a better understanding of incident reporting in relation to transitions in care between hospital and care home, and to codesign a systems-level response to safety issues for patients transitioning between hospital and care home.Methods and analysisTwo workstreams (W) will run in parallel. W1 will aim to develop a taxonomy of incident reporting in care homes, underpinned by structured interviews (N=150) with care home representatives, scoping review of care home incident reporting systems, and a review of incident reporting policy related to care homes. The taxonomy will be developed using a standardised approach to taxonomy development. W2 will be structured in three phases (P). P1a will consist of ≤40 interviews with care home staff to develop a better understanding of their specific internal systems for reporting incidents, and P1b will include ≤30 interviews with others involved in transitions between hospital and care home. P1a and P1b will also examine the impact of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on safe transitions. P2 will consist of a retrospective documentary analysis of care home data relating to resident transitions, with data size and sampling determined based on data sources identified in P1a. A validated data extraction form will be adapted before use. P3 will consist of four validation and codesign workshops to develop a service specification using National Health Service Improvement’s service specification framework, which will then be mapped against existing systems and recommendations produced. Framework analysis informed by the heuristic of systemic risk factors will be the primary mode of analysis, with content analysis used for analysing incident reports.Ethics and disseminationThe study has received university ethical approval and Health Research Authority approval. Findings will be disseminated to commissioners, providers and regulators who will be able to use the codesigned service specification to improve integrated care.

scholarly journals A qualitative study of older people with minimal care needs experiences of their admission to a nursing home with Registered Nurse care

2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 94-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alice K. Stevens ◽  
Helen Raphael ◽  
Sue M. Green
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Grounded Theory ◽  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Older People ◽  
Registered Nurse ◽  
Care Home ◽  
Care Homes ◽  
Care Needs ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Health And Social Care

Purpose – Residential care for older people in the UK includes care homes with and without 24-hour Registered Nurse (RN) care. Reduced autonomy and personal wealth can result when people assessed as having minimal care needs, enter and reside in care homes with RN care. The purpose of this paper is to explore the experiences of older people with minimal care needs admission to care homes with RN care. Design/methodology/approach – A qualitative study using a grounded theory method was undertaken. In total, 12 care home with RN care residents assessed as not requiring nursing care were interviewed. Initial sampling was purposive and progressed to theoretical. Interviews were analysed using the grounded theory analysis method of constant comparison and theory development. Findings – Two main categories emerged: “choosing the path”, which concerned the decision to enter the home, and “settling in”, which related to adaptation to the environment. Findings suggested participants who perceived they had greater control over the decision-making process found it easier to settle in the care home. The two categories linked to form an emerging framework of “crossing the bridge” from independent living to care home resident. Research limitations/implications – The findings contribute to the understanding of factors influencing admission of older people with minimal care needs to care homes with RN care and highlight the importance of informed decision making. Practical implications – Health and social care professionals must give informed support and advice to older people seeking care options to ensure their needs are best met. Originality/value – This study enabled older people with minimal care needs admission to care homes with RN care to voice their experiences.

scholarly journals Understanding co-worker relationships for promoting quality in care homes: protocol for a scoping review.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirsty Jayne Haunch ◽  
Karen Spilsbury
Keyword(s):  
Scoping Review ◽  
Social Care ◽  
Care Home ◽  
Evidence Base ◽  
Care Homes ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Care Home Staff ◽  
Team Working ◽  
Effective Interventions ◽  
Health And Social Care

Background: The relationships care home staff have with their co-workers influence how they feel about their work and their job performance. In care homes collaborative co-worker relationships are consistently linked to positive outcomes and have been identified as a key feature of overcoming challenges posed by COVID-19. Research on co-worker relationships in care homes to date however, is largely descriptive and poses knowledge gaps relating to the process of how co-worker relationships occur, along with what influences them. This hinders the development of targeted, effective interventions. Co-worker relationships to promote quality in care homes therefore demands clarity of understanding. The aim of the scoping review is to understand what is known about co-worker relationships and its applicability to care homes. We will synthesise evidence about both co-worker relationships in broader health and social care settings, which will allow us to draw on theories and find interventions potentially useful for a care home context.Methods: A scoping review will be undertaken to understand co-worker relationships in health and social care settings and to determine the volume, scope and quality of research in this field. Our review methods will follow scoping review guidance We will then work with stakeholders to understand the relevance and applicability of the evidence base for people living and working in, or visiting, care homes and to establish a future research agenda.Conclusion: This review is important and timely. Findings will assist care home managers to consider how to promote and improve effective team working. It will also provide the foundations for informing future research aimed at improving co-worker relationships in care homes for the benefit of residents.

scholarly journals Testing for SARS-CoV-2 in care home staff and residents in English care homes: A service evaluation

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emma Smith ◽  
Clare F Aldus ◽  
Julii Brainard ◽  
Sharon Dunham ◽  
Paul R Hunter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Care Home ◽  
Service Evaluation ◽  
Care Homes ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Testing Strategy ◽  
Home Team ◽  
Care Home Staff ◽  
Health And Social Care ◽  
Strategy Design ◽  
Nose And Throat

Background COVID-19 has especially affected care home residents. Aim To evaluate a nurse-led Enhanced Care Home Team (ECHT) enhanced SARS-CoV-2 testing strategy. Design and setting Service evaluation in care homes in Norfolk UK. Method Residents and staff received nose and throat swab tests (7 April to 29 June 2020). Resident test results were linked with symptoms on days 0-14 after test and mortality to 13 July 2020. Results Residents (n=518) in 44 homes and staff (n=340) in 10 care homes were tested. SARS-CoV-2 positivity was identified in 103 residents in 14 homes and 49 staff in seven homes. Of 103 SARS-CoV-2+ residents, just 38 had typical symptom(s) at time of test (new cough and/or fever). Amongst 54 residents who were completely asymptomatic when tested, 12 (22%) developed symptoms within 14 days. Compared to SARS-CoV-2 negative residents, SARS-CoV-2+ residents were more likely to exhibit typical symptoms (new cough (n=26, p=0.001); fever (n=24, p=<0.001)) or as generally-unwell (n=18, p=0.001). Of 38 resident deaths, 21 (55%) were initially attributed to SARS-CoV-2, all of whom tested SARS-CoV-2+. One death not initially attributed to SARS-CoV-2 also tested positive. Conclusion Testing identified asymptomatic and pre-symptomatic SARS-CoV-2+ residents and staff. Being generally-unwell was common amongst symptomatic residents and may indicate SARS-CoV-2 infection in older people in the absence of more typical symptoms. Where a resident appears generally unwell SARS-CoV-2-infection should be suspected. Protocols for testing involved integrated health and social care teams.

Enhanced healthcare in care homes for people with dementia: the Admiral nursing offer

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (7) ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Karen Harrison Dening ◽  
Zena Aldridge
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Residential Care ◽  
Social Care ◽  
Care Home ◽  
Dementia Care ◽  
Care Homes ◽  
Complex Needs ◽  
Care Home Staff ◽  
People With Dementia ◽  
Health And Social Care

Background The UK older population is higher than the global average. Over the next 20 years, England will see an increase in the number of older people who have higher levels of dependency, dementia and comorbidity, many of whom will require 24-hour residential care. It is estimated that 70% of residents in nursing and residential care homes either have dementia on admission or develop it while residing in the care home, many of who will have complex needs with high levels of multimorbidity. However, there is a lack of consistency in the provision of primary care and specialist services to this population and a known gap in knowledge and skills of dementia care in care home staff and primary care teams. Methods This article considers the current health policy drivers to enhance integrated health and social care provision to care homes and proposes a model of care that would support the aims of the NHS Long Term Plan for care to be delivered closer to home and improve out of hospital care which includes people who live in care homes by introducing Enhanced Health in Care Homes. It is crucial that such a model includes the correct skill mix to meet the needs of the care home population. Conclusions There are currently gaps in service provision to many care homes. Admiral nurse case managers and specialists in dementia care, are well placed to support the delivery of Enhanced Health in Care Homes and improve access to specialist support to care home residents, their families, care home staff and the wider health and social care system.

462 COUNSELLING IN CARE HOMES

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii1-ii4
Author(s):  
J Pybis ◽  
N Chigariro ◽  
J Bacon
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Service Delivery ◽  
Care Home ◽  
Poor Mental Health ◽  
Care Homes ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Home Setting ◽  
Care Home Staff ◽  
People With Dementia ◽  
Mental Health Foundation

Abstract Introduction Although many people live well within care homes, it is estimated that 60% of those living in residential care have poor mental health (Age Concern & Mental Health Foundation, 2006) and 40% suffer from depression (The Royal College of General Practitioners, 2014). Antidepressant prescribing has been reported to be nearly four times greater in care homes than for older people living in the community (Harris, Carey, Shah, Dewilde & Cook, 2012). However, antidepressants have been found to be ineffective for people with dementia (Dudas, Malouf, McCleery & Dening, 2018). With two-thirds of care home residents having some form of dementia, there is a need to find alternative interventions. Talking therapies, such as counselling, may be a useful alternative. Method Adopting a qualitative approach using semi-structured interviews and focus groups with counsellors (N = 12) who have experience of working in this context and with care home managers (N = 3) and care teams (N = 6), this study aimed to explore the feasibility of implementing counselling in a care home setting. We explored the views of care home staff towards counselling and identify barriers to service implementation, alongside the experience of counsellors who have delivered counselling in care homes to understand what service delivery models are currently adopted. Data were analysed thematically. Results Findings fell under the following key themes: The funding and referral process for counselling in a care home; skills and competences required; training needs; adaptations to practice; barriers to implementing counselling in a care home. Conclusions It is timely to consider the role of psychological therapy in supporting the mental health of care home residents. There is a need for further research to explore a service delivery model of counselling in care homes.

scholarly journals Using advance and emergency care plans during transfer decisions: A grounded theory interview study with care home staff

2021 ◽  
pp. 026921632110593
Author(s):  
Fawn Harrad-Hyde ◽  
Natalie Armstrong ◽  
Chris Williams
Keyword(s):  
Grounded Theory ◽  
Care Home ◽  
Care Homes ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Care Home Staff ◽  
Care Plans ◽  
Modifiable Factors ◽  
Advance Care ◽  
The Moment ◽  
Staff Experiences

Background: Advance care planning has been identified as one of few modifiable factors that could reduce hospital transfers from care homes. Several types of documents may be used by patients and clinicians to record these plans. However, little is known about how plans are perceived and used by care home staff at the time of deterioration. Aim: To describe care home staff experiences and perceptions of using written plans during in-the-moment decision-making about potential resident hospital transfers. Design: Qualitative semi-structured interviews analysed using the Straussian approach to grounded theory. Setting/participants: Thirty staff across six care homes (with and without nursing) in the East and West Midlands of England. Results: Staff preferred (in principle) to keep deteriorating residents in the care home but feared that doing so could lead to negative repercussions for them as individuals, especially when there was perceived discordance with family carers’ wishes. They felt that clinicians should be responsible for these plans but were happy to take a supporting role. At the time of deterioration, written plans legitimised the decision to care for the resident within the home; however, staff were wary of interpreting broad statements and wanted plans to be detailed, specific, unambiguous, technically ‘correct’, understood by families and regularly updated. Conclusions: Written plans provide reassurance for care home staff, reducing concerns about personal and professional risk. However, care home staff have limited discretion to interpret plans and transfers may occur if plans are not specific enough for care home staff to use confidently.

scholarly journals Process evaluation for the Care Homes Independent Pharmacist Prescriber Study (CHIPPS)

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda Birt ◽  
Lindsay Dalgarno ◽  
David J Wright ◽  
Mohammed Alharthi ◽  
Jackie Inch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Process Evaluation ◽  
Qualitative Data ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Care Home ◽  
Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Care Homes ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Medicines Management ◽  
Care Home Staff ◽  
Care Plans

Abstract Background Medicines management in care homes requires significant improvement. CHIPPS was a cluster randomised controlled trial to determine the effectiveness of integrating pharmacist independent prescribers into care homes to assume central responsibility for medicines management. This paper reports the parallel mixed-methods process evaluation. Method Intervention arm consisted of 25 triads: Care homes (staff and up to 24 residents), General Practitioner (GP) and Pharmacist Independent Prescriber (PIP). Data sources were pharmaceutical care plans (PCPs), pharmacist activity logs, online questionnaires and semi-structured interviews. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively. Qualitative data were analysed thematically. Results were mapped to the process evaluation objectives following the Medical Research Council framework. Results PCPs and activity logs were available from 22 PIPs. Questionnaires were returned by 16 PIPs, eight GPs, and two care home managers. Interviews were completed with 14 PIPs, eight GPs, nine care home managers, six care home staff, and one resident. All stakeholders reported some benefits from PIPs having responsibility for medicine management and identified no safety concerns. PIPs reported an increase in their knowledge and identified the value of having time to engage with care home staff and residents during reviews. The research paperwork was identified as least useful by many PIPs. PIPs conducted medication reviews on residents, recording 566 clinical interventions, many involving deprescribing; 93.8% of changes were sustained at 6 months. For 284 (50.2%) residents a medicine was stopped, and for a quarter of residents, changes involved a medicine linked to increased falls risk. Qualitative data indicated participants noted increased medication safety and improved resident quality of life. Contextual barriers to implementation were apparent in the few triads where PIP was not known previously to the GP and care home before the trial. In three triads, PIPs did not deliver the intervention. Conclusions The intervention was generally implemented as intended, and well-received by most stakeholders. Whilst there was widespread deprescribing, contextual factors effected opportunity for PIP engagement in care homes. Implementation was most effective when communication pathways between PIP and GP had been previously well-established. Trial registration The definitive RCT was registered with the ISRCTN registry (registration number ISRCTN 17847169).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document