Genital anomalies

Genital anomalies considers both congenital and acquired differences in genital anatomy in both men and women. Clinicians performing genital examinations will frequently encounter many of these in their practice, and within this chapter each anomaly is succinctly described and for many the appropriate management is subsequently outlined. In men, the following differences are included: epispadias, hypospadias, lymphocele, paraphimosis, Peyronie’s disease, priapism, phimosis, spermatoceles and epididymal cysts, urethral channels, and varicocele. In women: Bartholin gland pathology (cysts and abscesses), cervical polyps, Mullerian duct anomalies (vaginal agenesis, vaginal and uterine septae, unicornuate uterus and uterus didelphys), and urethral caruncles are outlined.

Author(s):  
Devyani Sawai ◽  
Susheel Kumar Sharma ◽  
Devashish Singh Sawai ◽  
Uttkarsha Sawai ◽  
Sangeeta Sharma ◽  
...  

The aim of this study is to report a rare case of pregnancy in uterus didelphys. Mullerian duct anomalies are congenital defects of the female genital system that arise from abnormal embryological development of the Mullerian ducts. A didelphys uterus, also known as double uterus is one of the least common amongst the various Mullerian duct anomalies. It results from complete failure of fusion of Mullerian ducts. There is presence of double uterine bodies with two separate cervices and often double or septate vagina. We report the case in our institute of a pregnancy in the left sided body of a didelphys uterus, delivered by caesarean section. Patients with uterus didelphys belong to high risk group and complications are increased in malformed uterus. Such cases need a meticulous prenatal care. It is a rare Mullerian anomaly and can present with varied obstetrical and gynaecological complications. Prompt and accurate diagnosis of uterine malformations and appropriate surgical intervention are essential to prevent complications.


2012 ◽  
Vol 19 (05) ◽  
pp. 723-729
Author(s):  
SARWAT ARA ◽  
TASNEEM ALI

Background: Müllerian duct anomalies (MDAs) occur with an incidence estimated to be 4.3%. A unicornuate uterus with orwithout a rudimentary horn; is a type of mullerian duct abnormality with a frequency of 0.4%. Rudimentary horn pregnancies are rare obstetriccomplication and may cause difficulty in diagnosis and subsequent management. Objective: To alert about Mullerian duct abnormalitiesespecially unicornuate uterus with or without rudimentary horn. Design: Case series. Setting: Study was conducted in the department ofGynecology and obstetrics unit1, Allied Hospital Faisalabad. Duration of study: Cases detected during September 2006-0ctober 2011.Subjects and methods: All admitted cases of MDA whether obstetric or gynecological were included. We calculated cases of unicornuateUterus with or without rudimentary horn, also included cases of rudimentary horn pregnancy with or without rupture. Results: There were120cases of MDA out of which 8 (6.6%) were of unicornuate uterus. Out of 8 unicornuate uteri, 7/8 (87.5%) were with rudimentary horn and1/8(12.5%) without rudimentary horn. Left rudimentary horn in 4/8 patient (50%), right in 3/8 (37.5%) without horn1/8 (12.5%).Out of 7 rudimentaryhorn 1/7 gynecologic and 6/7 were obstetric, 5/7 (71.42%) ruptured in second trimester, and1/7 (14.28%) term pregnancy. In 1/7 (14.28%) hornnot removed because tubal ligation was done. Unilateral renal agenesis was present in 3/8 patient (37.5 %). Ovaries were preserved in 3/7patients (66%). Conclusions: There must be high index of suspicion for Mullerian duct abnormalities especially rudimentary horn for achievinggood success in diagnosis and management.


2021 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naina Kumar ◽  
Ashu Yadav

Aims: Present study was conducted to know presentations and nature of Müllerian-duct anomalies in rural women. Background: Müllerian anomalies are congenital defects of female reproductive tract resulting from faulty development and fusion of Müllerian ducts. Objectives: To identify common Müllerian anomalies, their presentation, radiological appearances, complications, associated renal anomalies in rural women of Northern India. Methods: Present observational study was conducted on 181 female patients with suspected Müllerian anomalies presenting to the outpatient department of Obstetrics and Gynecology with various complaints. Data included age, religion, menarche, previous pregnancy if any, duration of infertility, presenting complaints, type of Müllerian anomaly, incidental or symptomatic, diagnostic method, associated anomalies. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS 22.0 version software. Results: Of 181 patients, 16.5% were adolescents, 83.5% adult women with an overall mean (SD) age of 25.02 (5.96) years. Of these, 170 had true Müllerian-duct anomalies and 11 had defects other than Müllerian anomalies, hence excluded. Total 158(92.9%) patients were symptomatic and 12(7.1%) asymptomatic at presentation. The majority (75.9%) were diagnosed incidentally during their visit to the department for various complaints of which infertility (32.4%) was most common. Septate uterus (29.4%) was most common anomaly diagnosed followed by Müllerian agenesis/hypoplasia (22.9%). Around 11.2% cases had associated renal and collecting system anomalies with unilateral renal agenesis (47.4%) being most common. Conclusion: Hence, Müllerian-duct anomalies have diverse presentations and most of them are diagnosed incidentally. Other: The exact prevalence of Müllerian-duct anomalies may be high, especially in rural India due to lack of knowledge and societal pressures.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document