Breast surgery

2021 ◽  
pp. 311-326

This chapter outlines the surgical and medical treatment of breast cancer in females and males, breast cancer screening, benign breast conditions, breast pain and gynaecomastia. It describes the assessment of a breast lump with triple assessment and also how to perform a punch biopsy.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miho Satoh ◽  
Naoko Sato

Abstract Background Early detection of breast cancer is effective for prolonging survival, but the participation rate in breast cancer screening among target Japanese women remains low. This study examined the relationships between tendencies in decision-making under uncertainty conditions, health behaviors, demographics, and breast cancer screening participation in Japanese women. Methods Data for women aged 40 years or older obtained in the 2017 Keio Household Panel Survey were analyzed. Participants answered questions about breast cancer screening attendance in the last year, risk aversion, time preference, health behaviors (e.g., smoking habit, alcohol consumption, and medical treatment received in the last year), and demographic variables. Responses were analyzed using chi-squared tests, t-tests, and logistic regression analysis. Variables were entered into the regression model if they were significantly associated with breast cancer screening participation in univariate analysis. Results A total of 2,729 of 2,945 households responded to the questionnaire. Data from 708 questionnaires were analyzed. Among the respondents, 28.8% had participated in breast cancer screening in the past year. Factors found to significantly contribute to breast cancer screening participation included higher risk aversity (odds ratio [OR], 2.34; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.03–5.32; p = 0.043), medical treatment received in the last year (OR, 1.56; 95%CI = 1.06–2.30; p = 0.026), higher self-rated health (OR, 1.47; 95% CI = 1.18–1.83; p = 0.001), living above the poverty line (OR, 2.31; 95% CI = 1.13–4.72; p = 0.022), and having children (OR, 1.57; 95% CI = 1.02–2.42; p = 0.042). Factors not significantly associated with screening participation were smoker (OR, 0.20; 95% CI = 0.10–0.42; p < 0.000), alcohol drinker (OR, 0.56; 95% CI = 0.37–0.86; p = 0.007), self-employed (OR, 0.22; 95% CI = 0.10–0.46; p < 0.000), and unemployed (OR, 0.48; 95% CI = 0.26–0.90; p = 0.022). No significant relationship was observed between time preference and screening participation. Conclusions The results indicate that women who recognize the actual risk of developing breast cancer or have high awareness of breast cancer prevention tend to participate in breast cancer screening. Barriers to screening participation are not working for an enterprise that encourages screening and low income.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lidia Blay ◽  
Anna Jansana ◽  
Javier Louro ◽  
Joana Ferrer ◽  
Marisa Baré ◽  
...  

Abstract BackgroundComplications and readmissions derived from surgical treatment of breast cancer have been scarcely evaluated. The studies that compare mastectomy with conservative, usually focus only in recurrence and/or mortality and sometimes the results are discordant in some aspects. The aim of this study was to analyze complications and readmissions, recurrence and mortality, according to the surgical treatment received in the mammary gland.Methods This multicenter study included 1086 women diagnosed with breast cancer from the CaMISS cohort study of women aged between 50 and 69 years participating in 4 breast cancer screening programs in Spain between 2000 and 2009 with a follow up until 2014. Multivariate models were used to estimate the adjusted odds ratio of breast surgery (mastectomy vs conservative treatment) for complications and readmissions and hazard ratios for recurrences and mortality.Results Primary breast surgical treatment consisted of conservative treatment in 821 women (80.1%) and mastectomy in 204 (19.9%). Mastectomy was associated with readmissions, recurrences and mortality but this association was not statistically significant on multivariate adjusted analysis (ORa=1.51 [95%CI 0.89-2.57], HRa=1.37 [95%CI 0.85-2.19] and HRa=1.52 [95%CI 0.95-2.43] respectively). In our sample, the variables with greatest impact on complications, recurrences and mortality were stages III and IV (ORa=4.4 [95%CI 1.22-16.16], HRa=7.96 [95%CI 3.32-19.06] and HRa=3.92 [95%CI 1.77-8.67]). Conclusion Complications, readmissions, recurrence and mortality were similar in both surgical techniques. These results support that surgical treatment for breast cancer can be adapted to professional and health system circumstances, and to the surgical needs and desires of each patient.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miho Satoh ◽  
Naoko Sato

Abstract Background: Early detection of breast cancer is effective for prolonging survival, but the participation rate in breast cancer screening among target Japanese women remains low. This study examined the relationships between tendencies in decision-making under uncertainty conditions, health behaviors, demographics, and breast cancer screening participation in Japanese women.Methods: Data for women aged 40 years or older obtained in the 2017 Keio Household Panel Survey were analyzed. Participants answered questions about breast cancer screening attendance in the last year, risk aversion, time preference, health behaviors (e.g., smoking habit, alcohol consumption, and medical treatment received in the last year), and demographic variables. Responses were analyzed using chi-squared tests, t-tests, and logistic regression analysis. Variables were entered into the regression model if they were significantly associated with breast cancer screening participation in univariate analysis.Results: A total of 2,729 of 2,945 households responded to the questionnaire. Data from 708 questionnaires were analyzed. Among the respondents, 28.8% had participated in breast cancer screening in the past year. Factors found to significantly contribute to breast cancer screening participation included higher risk aversity (odds ratio [OR], 2.34; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.03-5.32; p = 0.043), medical treatment received in the last year (OR, 1.56; 95%CI = 1.06-2.30; p = 0.026), higher self-rated health (OR, 1.47; 95% CI = 1.18-1.83; p = 0.001), living above the poverty line (OR, 2.31; 95% CI = 1.13-4.72; p = 0.022), and having children (OR, 1.57; 95% CI = 1.02-2.42; p = 0.042). Factors not significantly associated with screening participation were smoker (OR, 0.20; 95% CI = 0.10-0.42; p < 0.000), alcohol drinker (OR, 0.56; 95% CI = 0.37-0.86; p = 0.007), self-employed (OR, 0.22; 95% CI = 0.10-0.46; p < 0.000), and unemployed (OR, 0.48; 95% CI = 0.26-0.90; p = 0.022). No significant relationship was observed between time preference and screening participation.Conclusions: The results indicate that women who recognize the actual risk of developing breast cancer or have high awareness of breast cancer prevention tend to participate in breast cancer screening. Barriers to screening participation are not working for an enterprise that encourages screening and low income.


2019 ◽  
Vol 97 (2) ◽  
pp. 89-96
Author(s):  
Lidia Blay ◽  
Javier Louro ◽  
Teresa Barata ◽  
Marisa Baré ◽  
Joana Ferrer ◽  
...  

The Breast ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 148-153 ◽  
Author(s):  
I.O. Ellis ◽  
M.H. Galea ◽  
A. Locker ◽  
E.J. Roebuck ◽  
C.W. Elston ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 124 (5) ◽  
pp. 1375-1385 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesse C. Selber ◽  
Jonas A. Nelson ◽  
Adedayo O. Ashana ◽  
Meredith R. Bergey ◽  
Mirar N. Bristol ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document