Fruitful collaborations with religious and spiritual communities to foster mental health in general society: An international perspective

Author(s):  
Wai Lun Alan Fung ◽  
Victor A. Shepherd ◽  
King Yee Agatha Chong ◽  
Sujatha D. Sharma ◽  
Avdesh Sharma

Collaborations between mental health professionals (including psychiatrists) and spiritual care professionals/members of faith communities have been recommended by the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) and several national psychiatric organizations – to help attain high quality and equitable mental health care. Nonetheless, some are concerned about potential harms of such collaborations. It is imperative that such collaborations be ethical and person-centred. The diverse range of individuals who might be regarded as members of spiritual/religious communities also leads to significant variations in how these collaborations may occur. While the American Psychiatric Association (APA) Mental Health and Faith Community Partnership has presented one such model of collaboration at the national level, this chapter endeavours to illustrate the diverse forms, levels, cultural and geographical contexts of how these collaborations may occur – through the perspectives of mental health and spiritual care professionals from Canada, Hong Kong and India. Implications from these examples are also explored.

2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 109-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimberley Wriedt ◽  
Daryl Oehm ◽  
Brendon Moss ◽  
Prem Chopra

Purpose – Women from culturally and linguistically diverse communities face barriers to accessing perinatal mental health care. Victorian Transcultural Mental Health (VTMH) is a state-wide service in Victoria, Australia, that supports specialist mental health service providers to improve cultural responsiveness. VTMH provided training for perinatal health professionals in cultural responsiveness. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach – A curriculum was specifically developed based on a literature review, consultation forum, and input from members of an industry-based reference group. An Evaluation Tool was designed to collect participants’ feedback regarding the perceived relevance of the training content and its impact on practice. Responses were analysed using quantitative techniques and thematic analysis. Findings – Nine face-to-face training sessions were provided, in metropolitan and rural regions. In all, 174 professionals of various backgrounds (including midwives, mental health professionals, and maternal child health nurses) attended. In all, 161 completed evaluations were received and responses indicated that the training was of high relevance to the target workforce, that the training would have implications for their practice, and support was given for further training to be delivered using online methods. Research limitations/implications – First, an assessment of the cultural competence of participants prior to enrolment in the course was not conducted, and no matched control group was available for comparison with the participants. Second, generalisability of these findings to other settings requires further investigation. Third, the sustainability of the project is an area for further study in the future. Fourth, other methods including direct interviews of focus groups with participants may have yielded more detailed qualitative feedback regarding the effectiveness of the programme. Practical implications – To facilitate the sustainability of the project, following the face-to-face training, an online training module and a resource portal were developed, offering links to relevant web sites and resources for health professionals working in this field. Originality/value – The training addressed a significant unmet need for cultural responsiveness training for a diverse range of practitioners in the field of perinatal mental health. Online training can be adapted from face-to-face training and it is anticipated that online training will facilitate the sustainability of this initiative.


2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bart Cusveller ◽  
Maarten van Garderen ◽  
Joan Roozemond-Kroon

Abstract Aim: To explore how mental health professionals address spiritual care for outpatients in weekly multidisciplinary care meetings (MDM), and to explore the barriers and facilitators in the ways health professionals address spiritual care in those meetings. Method: Two teams of mental health professionals providing care for psychiatric outpatients are included. Qualitative data were collected from audio recordings of multidisciplinary meetings and from focus-group interviews afterwards. Data were analysed using ‘open coding’. Results: Spiritual care was not frequently addressed mostly due to the requirements of the health insurance reimbursement system. Aspects of spirituality addressed in these meetings pertained mainly to meaningful daily activities. Addressing spiritual care was facilitated, on the other hand, by a holistic focus on health and recovery-oriented care. Conclusion: In ambulatory mental healthcare spirituality is sparsely addressed and, when addressed, few aspects of spirituality come into view. Facilitating healthcare professionals’ awareness of their clinical perspective is an essential step to improve spiritual care for psychiatric outpatients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document