Management of midface fractures: maxilla

2021 ◽  
pp. 817-820
Author(s):  
Jiten D. Parmar ◽  
Lachlan M. Carter
Keyword(s):  
Internal Fixation ◽  
High Energy ◽  
Fracture Pattern ◽  
Fracture Treatment ◽  
Le Fort ◽  
Facial Injuries ◽  
Midface Fractures ◽  
Le Fort Classification

Maxillary fractures can be classified according to fracture pattern as described by the Le Fort classification. These are usually high-energy injuries and there are often other facial injuries associated with these fractures that need to be identified and managed in addition to the treatment of the fracture itself. Fracture treatment is by reduction and stabilization, usually with internal fixation. Complications of the injury and treatment are discussed in this chapter

scholarly journals Perfil epidemiológico das fraturas radiais distais em hospital de referência em Ribeirão Preto, Brasil

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Felipe Azevedo Mendes de Oliveira ◽  
Thiago Agostini Pereira Albeny ◽  
Luis Guilherme Rosifini Alves Rezende ◽  
Filipe Jun Shimaoka ◽  
Amanda Favaro Cagnolati ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Distal Radius Fracture ◽  
Distal Radius ◽  
Case Series ◽  
High Energy ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Radius Fracture ◽  
Distal Radial Fracture ◽  
Fracture Treatment ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Distal Radial Fractures

Objetivo: Avaliar o perfil epidemiológico das fraturas do rádio distal em hospitais de referência em Ribeirão Preto(SP), Brasil. Não existem dados suficientes na literatura nacional que corroborem com o perfil epidemiológico das fraturas do rádio distal. Métodos: 245 pacientes apresentaram 254 fraturas do rádio distal, ocorridas entre 2014 a 2017 foram avaliadas retrospectivamente para obtenção do perfil epidemiológico. Os fatores analisados foram idade e sexo, mecanismo do trauma, sazonalidade, tipo de fratura baseada na Classificação AO, presença de exposição óssea, lesões associadas, tipo de tratamento realizado (conservador ou cirúrgico) e o tipo de implante utilizado nos tratamentos cirúrgicos. Resultados: 60,2% dos pacientes participantes eram do sexo masculino e 39,8% do sexo feminino, distribuídos de forma bimodal. A média de idade foi 45,4 anos. Fraturas expostas corresponderam a 92,1% das fraturas e 7,9% representaram as expostas. Pacientes politraumatizados representaram 62,6%. O tempo médio de internação foi 8,09 dias. Conclusão: Apesar do padrão de fraturas mostrar semelhanças com outros estudos, o padrão apresentado pode não traduzir, de forma homogênea, o padrão obtido em outras metrópoles e grandes centros.Descritores: Fraturas do Rádio; Traumatismos do Punho; Epidemiologia; Hospitais Especializados.ReferênciasBruce KK, Merenstein DJ, Narvaez MV, Neufeld SK, Paulus MJ, Tan TP et al. Lack of Agreement on Distal Radius Fracture Treatment. J Am Board Fam Med. 2016;29(2):218-25.MacIntyre NJ, Dewan N. Epidemiology of distal radius fractures and factors predicting risk and prognosis. J Hand Ther. 2016;29(2):136-45.Court-Brown CM, Caesar B. Epidemiology of adult fractures: A review. Injury. 2006;37(8):691-97.Nellans KW, Kowalski E, Chung KC. The epidemiology of distal radius fractures. Hand Clin. 2012;28(2):113-25. Flinkkilä T, Sirniö K, Hippi M, Hartonen S, Ruuhela R, Ohtonen P et al. Epidemiology and seasonal variation of distal radius fractures in Oulu, Finland. Osteoporos Int. 2011;22(8):2307-312.Lindau TR, Aspenberg P, Arner M, Redlundh-Johnell I, Hagberg L. Fractures of the distal forearm in young adults. An epidemiologic description of 341 patients. Acta Orthop Scand. 1999;70(2):124-28.Diamantopoulos AP, Rohde G, Johnsrud I, Skoie IM, Hochberg M, Haugeberg G. The epidemiology of low- and high-energy distal radius fracture in middle-aged and elderly men and women in Southern Norway. PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e43367.Wilcke MK, Hammarberg H, Adolphson PY. Epidemiology and changed surgical treatment methods for fractures of the distal radius: a registry analysis of 42,583 patients in Stockholm County, Sweden, 2004–2010. Acta Orthop. 2013;84(3):292-96.Sigurdardottir K, Halldorsson S, Robertsson J. Epidemiology and treatment of distal radius fractures in Reykjavik, Iceland, in 2004. Comparison with an Icelandic study from 1985. Acta Orthop. 2011;82(4):494-98.Solgaard S, Petersen VS. Epidemiology of distal radius fractures. Acta Orthop Scand. 1985;56(5):391-93.Brogren E, Petranek M, Atroshi I. Incidence and characteristics of distal radius fractures in a southern Swedish region. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2007;8:48. Tsai CH, Muo CH, Fong YC, et al. A population-based study on trend in incidence of distal radial fractures in adults in Taiwan in 2000-2007. Osteoporos Int. 2011;22(11):2809-815.Koo OT, Tan DM, Chong AK. Distal radius fractures: an epidemiological review. Orthop Surg. 2013;5(3):209-13. Dóczi J, Renner A. Epidemiology of distal radius fractures in Budapest. A retrospective study of 2,241 cases in 1989. Acta Orthop Scand. 1994;65(4):432-33.Chen NC, Jupiter JB. Management of distal radial fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(9):2051-62.Pagano M, Gauvreau K. Princípios de Bioestatística. 2. ed. São Paulo: Pioneira Thompson Learning; 2004.                                  Court-Brown CM. Epidemiologia das fraturas e luxações. In: Court-Brown CM et al. (ed.); Fraturas em adultos de Rockwood Green. 8. ed. Barueri, SP: Manole; 2016.Fanuele J, Koval KJ, Lurie J, Zhou W, Tosteson A, Ring D. Distal radial fracture treatment: what you get may depend on your age and address. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(6):1313-19.Jupiter JB, Marent-Huber M; LCP Study Group. Operative management of distal radial fractures with 2.4-millimeter locking plates: a multicenter prospective case series. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92(Suppl 1 Pt 1):96-106.

scholarly journals Findings of Routine Diagnostic Ankle Arthroscopy for Management of AO 44-C Fibular Fractures

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 2473011417S0001
Author(s):  
Daniel Dean ◽  
Francis McGuigan ◽  
Nicholas Casscells
Keyword(s):  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Open Reduction ◽  
Case Series ◽  
High Energy ◽  
Ankle Arthroscopy ◽  
Ankle Fractures ◽  
Mechanism Of Injury ◽  
Loose Bodies ◽  
Therapeutic Benefits ◽  
Articular Damage

Category: Ankle, Arthroscopy, Trauma Introduction/Purpose: High fibula fractures, including Maisonneuve and Weber type C fractures are commonly associated with syndesmotic injuries resulting in subluxation and dislocation of the ankle. These injuries to the joint are rarely evaluated or addressed during operative fixation, which generally consists of open reduction internal fixation of the fibula with or without fixation of the syndesmosis. Chondral lesions and loose bodies in ankle fractures may predict a poor result and can be addressed using arthroscopy to avoid exacerbating articular damage. The purpose of this study is to identify the frequency and severity of articular pathology in Weber C and Maisonneuve fibula fractures. Methods: A single surgeon case series of operatively managed ankle fractures with arthroscopic assessment from 2011-2015 was retrospectively reviewed. Inclusion criteria were patients with AO 44-C ankle fractures who were aged >17 and underwent arthroscopic assessment of the ankle joint prior to open reduction and internal fixation. Patients were excluded from the series if they presented <2 weeks from the time of injury, had a pilon variant, or had incomplete medical records available. Demographic information on the patients including age, sex, and BMI were collected. Information on mechanism of injury was recorded. Operative reports were reviewed and the presence of chondral injury and loose bodies was recorded. Descriptive statistics were performed on the collected data. Results: 18 patients (12 male, 6 female) with a mean age of 38.3 years (range 17-61; SD 13.9) were included in the case series. The average BMI 29.6 (SD 6.92). Five of the included fractures were Maisonneuve fractures while the remaining 13 were Weber C ankle fractures. The mechanism of injury of the fracture was low energy in 12, high energy in 1, and unknown in 5. On arthroscopic examination, 12 (66.7%) of the fractures were associated with full thickness articular cartilage injury requiring formal chondroplasty, 16 (88.9%) were associated with a minimum of partial articular damage, and only 2 (11.1%) had no articular damage identified on arthroscopy. Additionally, 12 (66.7%) had loose bodies that were removed during ankle arthroscopy. Conclusion: This study adds to a growing collection of literature concerning chondral injuries during ankle fractures. The data from this study suggest that AO 44-C fibular fractures are associated with a high rate of intraarticular pathology that can be effectively identified and managed during arthroscopy. Prospective studies are required to determine if there are therapeutic benefits to routine ankle arthroscopy in AO 44-C ankle fractures.

Supracondylar fractures of the femur

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wingrove T. Jarvis ◽  
Ananda M. Nanu
Keyword(s):  
High Energy ◽  
Fracture Pattern ◽  
Low Energy ◽  
Supracondylar Fractures ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Fractures Of The Femur ◽  
Surgical Option

♦ Supracondylar fractures of the femur are seen in the young (high energy) and the old (low energy). Both groups have their own specific problems♦ The advantages and disadvantages of each surgical option must be considered in relation to the individual patient and their fracture pattern.

scholarly journals Le Fort III in Syndromic Craniosynostosis: Cost Comparison of Distraction Osteogenesis Versus Single-Stage Internal Fixation Techniques

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 125-129
Author(s):  
Adam J. Mosa ◽  
Elizabeth Zellner ◽  
Emily S. Ho ◽  
Mark D. Fisher ◽  
John H. Phillips ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Distraction Osteogenesis ◽  
Single Stage ◽  
Cost Data ◽  
Cost Comparison ◽  
Le Fort ◽  
Rigid Internal Fixation ◽  
Syndromic Craniosynostosis ◽  
Le Fort Iii

Purpose: In syndromic craniosynostosis, the Le Fort III osteotomy is used to correct dental/skeletal imbalance, improve exorbitism, and increase the airway. The purpose of this study is to perform a cost comparison between the standard technique of single-stage rigid internal fixation and distraction osteogenesis (DO) in the Le Fort III osteotomy in this patient population. Method: Hospital cost accounting databases were queried for patients undergoing single-stage advancement (SS) or DO from 2007 to 2016. Nominal cost data were adjusted using the Bank of Canada Consumer Price Index. Reported costs represented the full length of stay for all utilization per patient. Demographic information and cost data for single-stage osteotomy and DO were compared. Results: Total costs for single-stage (n = 8) were higher than distraction (n = 6; mean $CAD57 825 vs $38 268, P < .05). Intensive care unit (ICU) costs for single-stage were significantly higher than distraction (mean, $17 746 vs $5585, P < .005). Distraction cases had higher operating room (OR) costs than single stage, but the difference was not significant (mean, $12 540 vs $9696). Length of stay was significantly longer for SS patients (mean, 11 days vs 7 days, P < .05). Conclusions: This single-institution retrospective cost analysis indicates standard SS rigid internal fixation Le Fort III is more costly than DO. Despite higher OR costs, prolonged ICU and hospital stay was the primary reason behind this difference. This information may be of benefit when advocating for new technology perceived as high cost.

Predictors of Time to Union After Operative Fixation of Closed Ankle Fractures

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 308-314 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew P. Matson ◽  
Kamran S. Hamid ◽  
Samuel B. Adams
Keyword(s):  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Open Reduction ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
High Energy ◽  
Delayed Union ◽  
Ankle Fractures ◽  
Patient Counseling ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Energy Mechanism

Background. Ankle fractures are common and represent a significant burden to society. We aim to report the rate of union as determined by clinical and radiographic data, and to identify factors that predict time to union. Methods. A cohort of 112 consecutive patients with isolated, closed, operative malleolar ankle fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation was retrospectively reviewed for time to clinical union. Clinical union was defined based on radiographic and clinical parameters, and delayed union was defined by time to union >12 weeks. Injury characteristics, patient factors and treatment variables were recorded, and statistical techniques employed included the Chi-square test, the Student’s T-test, and multivariate linear regression modeling. Results. Forty-two (37.5%) of patients who achieved union did so in less than 12 weeks, and 69 (61.6%) of these patients demonstrated delayed union at a mean of 16.7 weeks (range, 12.1-26.7 weeks), and the remaining patient required revision surgery. Factors associated with higher rates of delayed union or increased time to union included tobacco use, bimalleolar fixation, and high energy mechanism (all p<0.05). In regression analysis, statistically significant negative predictors of time to union were BMI, dislocation of the tibiotalar joint, external fixation for initial stabilization and delay of definitive management (all p<0.05). Conclusion. Patient characteristics, injury factors and treatment variables are predictive of time to union following open reduction and internal fixation of closed ankle fractures. These findings should assist with patient counseling, and help guide the provider when considering adjunctive therapies that promote bone healing. Levels of Evidence: Prognostic, Level IV: Case series

A Rare Case of Reverse Oblique Ulnar Head and Neck Fracture

Hand Surgery ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 20 (03) ◽  
pp. 477-478 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li June Tay ◽  
Howard Cottam ◽  
Jonathan Compson
Keyword(s):  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Rare Case ◽  
Fracture Pattern ◽  
Ulnar Head ◽  
Neck Fracture

Isolated distal ulnar head and neck fractures are rare. Undisplaced fractures are normally treated non-operatively. We report a case of a reverse oblique ulnar head and neck fracture, which despite the initial undisplaced configuration, was unstable and displaced over the subsequent weeks. We believe that, though this particular fracture pattern could have been treated in a cast, it requires careful follow up, especially early on, or to undergo early internal fixation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document