Dynamic Social Judgment

Author(s):  
Jennifer S. Beer ◽  
Jamil P. Bhanji
Keyword(s):  
2010 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 76-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank Asbrock

The stereotype content model says that warmth and competence are fundamental dimensions of social judgment. This brief report analyzes the cultural stereotypes of relevant social groups in a German student sample (N = 82). In support of the model, stereotypes of 29 societal groups led to five stable clusters of differing warmth and competence evaluations. As expected, clusters cover all four possible combinations of warmth and competence. The study also reports unique findings for the German context, for example, similarities between the perceptions of Turks and other foreigners. Moreover, it points to different stereotypes of lesbians and gay men.


2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth R. Thompson ◽  
Valerie E. Jefferis ◽  
Tanya L. Chartrand
Keyword(s):  

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel Chasse ◽  
Fade Eadeh ◽  
Stephanie Peak ◽  
N. Pontus Leander

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Troy Campbell ◽  
Leaf van Boven ◽  
Ed O'Brien ◽  
Peter Ubel ◽  
Norbert Schwarz

2021 ◽  
pp. 003329412198899
Author(s):  
Peter J. Helm ◽  
Uri Lifshin ◽  
Jeff Greenberg ◽  
Tom Pyszczynski

We tested the hypothesis that if indefinite life extension (ILE) through medical technologies were to become a reality, then people may become harsher in their judgment of social transgressors. In support of this hypothesis, we found that higher positive attitudes towards ILE technologies related to harshness in judgment of social transgressions (Study 1), and that making ILE plausible (compared to not plausible) led participants to endorse harsher punishments for social transgressors (Studies 2–3). We replicated this effect and found that it is not amplified by subliminal death primes, although the primes also increased harshness (Study 3). These results may have implications to understanding how social judgment may be affected by the prospect of ILE.


Author(s):  
Asuka Kaneko ◽  
Yui Asaoka ◽  
Young-A Lee ◽  
Yukiori Goto

Abstract Background Decision-making and judgments in our social activities often erroneous and irrational, known as social biases. However, cognitive and affective processes that produce such biases remain largely unknown. In this study, we investigated associations between social schemas, such as social judgment and conformity, entailing social biases and psychological measurements relevant to cognitive and affective functions. Method Forty-two healthy adult subjects were recruited in this study. A psychological test and a questionnaire were administered to assess biased social judgements by superficial attributes and social conformity by adherence to social norms, respectively, along with additional questionnaires and psychological tests for cognitive and affective measurements, including negative affects, autistic traits, and Theory of Mind (ToM). Associations of social judgment and conformity with cognitive and affective functions were examined multiple regression analysis and structural equation modeling. Results Anxiety and the cognitive realm of ToM were mutually associated with both social judgments and conformity, although social judgements and conformity were still independent processes with each other. Social judgements were also associated with autistic traits and the affective realm of ToM, whereas social conformity was associated with negative affects other than anxiety and intuitive decision-making style. Conclusions These results suggest that ToM and negative affects may play important roles in social judgements and conformity, and social biases connoted in these social schemas.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document