scholarly journals Management of Soft-Tissue Wounds, Burns, and Hand Injuries in the Field Setting

1996 ◽  
Vol 161 (8) ◽  
pp. 469-471 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael S. Baker
Hand Clinics ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Goetz A Giessler ◽  
Detlev Erdmann ◽  
Guenter Germann

2004 ◽  
Vol 37 (02) ◽  
pp. 129-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jagannath B. Kamath ◽  
Chitta Ranjan Sahu ◽  
Thangam Verghese Joshua

ABSTRACTAbdominal and groin flaps are the main workhorse for soft tissue defects in hand injuries. A simple and easy method is being described for immobilising the upper limb following abdominal and groin flaps for soft tissue defects of the hand using commonly available clavicular braces. This is devoid of all the problems of immobilisation using the common methods such as adhesive plasters and pin fixators and has its own advantages.


1986 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-50
Author(s):  
INGER KJELDAL

Three cases of compound irreducible dorsal dislocation of the proximal interphalangeal joint of the finger are reported. The probable mechanism is discussed. The findings warrant the description “volar capsular boutonnière” as the condyles of the proximal phalanx buttonhole, through the volar structures. Open reduction combined with debridement, is the treatment for such compound irreducible dorsal dislocations. Dislocation of the proximal interphalangeal joints of the fingers are common and can usually be reduced by simple traction. Occasionally reduction by closed methods is unsuccessful because of interposition of volar or dorsal soft tissue structures (Lamb 1981). This study reports three cases of compound dorsal dislocation of the proximal interphalangeal joint with volar soft tissue interposition. Such lesions are sparsely mentioned in text books on fractures and hand injuries and hitherto only a few cases have been published (Lamb 1981, Bunnell 1956).


2010 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 121-124
Author(s):  
Shaheel Chummun ◽  
T. D. Winwood ◽  
R. L. C. Milligan ◽  
S. M. Wilson
Keyword(s):  

1993 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 122-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. J. SHEWRING ◽  
M. H. MATTHEWSON

Hand injuries are a common consequence of playing rugby. A prospective study of all rugby injuries referred to a hand clinic over the course of one season was carried out. 72 patients with such injuries were seen. There were 46 fractures and 26 soft tissue injuries. A substantial number were caused deliberately by opponents. One-third of the injuries were thought to be preventable.


QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Moustafa Ahmed AbdelAliem ◽  
Mina Agaiby Estawrow ◽  
Shaaban Mohamed Abd Almajeed ◽  
Abdelrahman Mohamed El-maraghy

Abstract Background Hand injuries contribute to financial losses in terms of treatment, time off work and loss of job. Hand injuries are rising and therefore increasing awareness and improving management of hand injuries are warranted in low resources settings. Objective A systematic review and meta-analysis of different modalities of management of early and late traumatic soft tissue defects of the hand. Data Sources Medline databases (PubMed, Medscape, ScienceDirect. EMF-Portal) and all materials available in the Internet till 2018. Data Extraction If the studies did not fulfill the inclusion criteria, they were excluded. Study quality assessment included whether ethical approval was gained, eligibility criteria specified, appropriate controls, and adequate information and defined assessment measures. Conclusion Soft tissue defects of the hand can be reconstructed effectively with multiple options that can restore function in addition to stable coverage. The use of grafts with several local and regional flaps have been identified including advancement flaps, rotation flaps in cases where local tissue is available and healthy. Which have the ability to match colour and texture of the recipient site, coverage of vital structures with minimal donor site morbidity. The preferred approach is the simplest method which can provide the most stable coverage. A careful selection of flap choice for coverage of a hand defects should take into account the anatomy and functional requirements of the defect site, the patient’s health condition and the surgeons experience to ensure good functional and aesthetic outcomes for the patients.


Author(s):  
Dominic Furniss ◽  
Anthony J. Heywood

♦ Limit initial soft tissue damage♦ Reconstruct key soft tissue elements♦ Functional rehabilitation.


2012 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 250-254 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shahram Nazerani ◽  
Mohammad Hosein Kalantar Motamedi ◽  
Mohammad Reza Keramati ◽  
Nikdokht Rashidian ◽  
Tara Nazerani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 36 (02) ◽  
pp. 104-109
Author(s):  
John M. Roberts ◽  
Logan W. Carr ◽  
Christopher T. Haley ◽  
Randy M. Hauck ◽  
Brett F. Michelotti

Background The use of the venous flap for simultaneous revascularization and coverage of soft tissue defects has been documented in the literature for over 30 years. First described in 1981, Nakayama et al demonstrated that a vein and overlying skin, or a venous flap, may be transposed from one area of the body to another with complete survival of the graft. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review of the literature to determine predictors of venous flap survival in traumatic hand injuries. Methods A literature search of PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library was performed with emphasis on venous flap use in traumatic hand injuries. MeSH terms included: vein graft, revascularization, venous flow through flap, arterialized venous flap, bypass, replantation, amputation, avulsion, trauma, injury, amputate, finger, hand, and thumb. Results Forty-three articles were collected that contained data on 626 free venous flaps. Most patients were males (73.9) and injured their right hand (52.3%). The forearm was the most commonly used venous flap donor site (83.6%), and most of the skin paddles were 10 to 25 cm2 (41.1%). Arterial inflow was used in 93.1% of the flaps. Most venous flaps (79.6%) healed without superficial tissue loss or necrosis. Ninety-two (14.7%) flaps had partial loss while 36 (5.8%) flaps did not survive. Conclusion The use of venous flaps for concomitant revascularization and soft tissue coverage of the hand permits good results with limited morbidity. The overall flap survival rate is nearly 95%. Younger patients whose flaps have arterial inflow and skin paddles of medium size (10–25 cm2) have the best chance for survival.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document